Sewlek's Beta Test Mod

15455575960131

Comments

  • MendaspMendasp I touch maps in inappropriate places Valencia, Spain Join Date: 2002-07-05 Member: 884Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor, Constellation, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Gold, NS2 Map Tester, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow, Retired Community Developer
    Godar BT server now updated too.
  • ScatterScatter Join Date: 2012-09-02 Member: 157341Members, Squad Five Blue
    Just been thinking about cysts and infestation lately. Is the cyst still the best way of spreading this or are there potentially other methods that could save us fps?
  • TweadleTweadle Join Date: 2005-02-03 Member: 39686Members, NS2 Map Tester
    With performance as big a sticking point as it is, I would love to see us ruthlessly cut dubious mechanics like cysts. People don't play the game for cysts alone but they do leave the game for performance.
  • current1ycurrent1y Join Date: 2003-12-08 Member: 24150Members, NS2 Playtester, NS2 Map Tester, Reinforced - Shadow, Subnautica Playtester
    edited May 2013
    Are cysts an issue any more? I thought i remember them fixing that? I do agree with what you are saying though. I got a feeling people would stick around more if they were getting higher fps. Personally speaking I played around 300 hrs at sub 30 fps and it got tiring to the point I would have quit playing if couldn't have afforded to buy a new pc.

  • IronHorseIronHorse Developer, QA Manager, Technical Support & contributor Join Date: 2010-05-08 Member: 71669Members, Super Administrators, Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Developer, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Subnautica Playtester, Subnautica PT Lead, Pistachionauts
    edited May 2013
    I'd actually be curious to see screen shot comparisons of any processor that's over 3.5 ghz (because let's be honest here, the remaining fans and comp players have mostly OC for this game already - this also rules out the insufficient core 2 Duos mostly) lose more than 10 fps* with cysts in the room compared to not.

    I have a four year old i7 920 and i can't see more than a ~3 fps difference in a giant room like cargo.
    Now rich infestation on the other hand is different, but
    A) comp players and therefore those that typically post in here don't use it
    B) cysts are the ones that keep getting brought up and getting the bad rep
    C) removing cysts as just suggested this page would still leave said rich infestation in use

    *My line of thinking is : there is way bigger culprits out there for fps loss that add up to much more than 10 fps at the end of rounds.. So why would you target such a small contributor if performance was truly the focus of your argument for removal?

    Disclaimer : honestly not trying to inflame anyone, just genuinely curious if cysts really are that much of a fps loss for some of you..
    And so you know that i am not lying about my results, here's the screenshots with fps in the top left:
    http://i.imgur.com/wZb2v1J.jpg
    http://i.imgur.com/grhydTn.jpg
    http://i.imgur.com/YWsE85B.jpg
  • ritualsacrificeritualsacrifice Join Date: 2012-11-14 Member: 171148Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    current1y wrote: »
    Are cysts an issue any more? I thought i remember them fixing that? I do agree with what you are saying though. I got a feeling people would stick around more if they were getting higher fps. Personally speaking I played around 300 hrs at sub 30 fps and it got tiring to the point I would have quit playing if couldn't have afforded to buy a new pc.

    They improved them, but I don't think they "fixed" them. I don't think they CAN fix them, tbh.
  • kespeckespec Join Date: 2012-11-18 Member: 172279Members
    biomass thing is good please add it to the game
  • TweadleTweadle Join Date: 2005-02-03 Member: 39686Members, NS2 Map Tester
    It might not be the cysts in a room per se, but rather the ever-increasing logic demands it places on rounds as more networks exist? I'm not technical enough to know for sure and I can't be arsed to test it but my anecdotal experience from xDragon's NS2c mod was that the removal of grid/infestation really improved the performance on my PC - that was a while ago however.

    Without getting into the debate here, I would advocate the removal of those features irrespective of their affect on performance so you're absolutely right in identifying the not-so-hidden case I'm making. I just think that even +3-5fps (and I suspect it's probably more on long rounds) makes a difference at this stage!
  • CyberKunCyberKun Join Date: 2013-02-02 Member: 182733Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    edited May 2013
    Sewlek, as an idea to test.

    Make Biomass give 8% of base HP per amount instead of the 2% or the like. Two full biomass hives would give as much HP as Carapace and Biomass currently gives. Remove Carapace and replace it with Reactive Armor. Any time you would take lethal damage or over 250 damage in .2 seconds, you gain 15/30/45% damage reduction instead for like .2 seconds. Would counter Shotguns/Railguns/Grenaderlaunchers and would be an interesting test.

    It would be a way to remove Carapace and make it not the most important upgrade in the game.
  • bizbiz Join Date: 2012-11-05 Member: 167386Members
    IronHorse wrote: »
    I'd actually be curious to see screen shot comparisons of any processor that's over 3.5 ghz (because let's be honest here, the remaining fans and comp players have mostly OC for this game already - this also rules out the insufficient core 2 Duos mostly) lose more than 10 fps* with cysts in the room compared to not.

    you are delusional if you think most NS2 players overclock
  • CrushaKCrushaK Join Date: 2012-11-05 Member: 167195Members, NS2 Playtester
    edited May 2013
    At one point I devs said that the code is not really event based because that would open completely different cans of worms than it would help performance. I have no clue to which extent this is true and I did at no point peek at the code to see how it actually works internally.

    But based on that statement above, I really wonder if something is going on like
    class Drifter

    // executed once every frame
    function tick()
    {
    ....ForEach curEntity in allEntities
    ....{
    ........if (curEntity.isA(AlienStructure))
    ........{
    ............if (vSizeSq(curEntity.location - self.location) < drifterGrowRadius)
    ................growStructure(curEntitiy);
    ............elseif (vSizeSq(curEntity.location - self.location) < maxAutoGrowCheckRadiusSquared)
    ................moveTo(curEntity.location);

    ............break;
    ........}
    ....}
    }

    or instead still a somewhat event-based approach
    class KhammanderInterface

    function droppedStructure()
    {
    ....[...]

    ....ForEach curEntity in allEntities
    ....{
    ........if (curEntity.isA(Drifter)
    ............Drifter(curEntity).checkDrifterGrow();
    ....}
    }



    class Drifter

    // called once on all Drifters only whenver a structure is dropped by the khammander or the Drifter changed it's location
    function checkDrifterGrow()
    {
    ....ForEach curEntity in allEntities
    ....{
    ........if (curEntity.isA(AlienStructure))
    ........{
    ............if (vSizeSq(curEntity.location - self.location) < drifterGrowRadius)
    ................growStructure(curEntitiy);
    ............elseif (vSizeSq(curEntity.location - self.location) < maxAutoGrowCheckRadiusSquared)
    ................moveTo(curEntity.location);

    ............break;
    ........}
    ....}
    }


    The first example would perform distance checks on every tick and try to find close stuff. This works fine for things like Crags that are supposed to interact with a lot of dynamic things. Armories might do the same, though native collision hash checks could work as well to notify about close entities instead of checking on their own.

    But the second approach seems so much better for performance since it only executes code and checks for stuff after something changed in the gameplay that would make it necessary to do so.
    You could extend this kind of approach to other things as well: instead of checking every tick whether or not a cyst is still connected to it's parent (and checking recursively whether or not that parent still has a connection as well) you would only check the entire cyst network whenever a new cyst or hive is planted or whenever a cyst or hive gets destroyed.
    Or for power nodes: instead of letting every structure check on every tick whether or not it's in a location with power, have the power tell the structures in the associated room about the changed state. (If it's not already done that way)


    Again, I have no clue about the implementation details in Spark and these assumptions are only based on something I recall a dev saying in the past.
  • CrushaKCrushaK Join Date: 2012-11-05 Member: 167195Members, NS2 Playtester
    Btw, I didn't see anyone talk about the latest changes:

    You seem to gain 0.1 Biomass levels per alien structure that you build, in addition to the usual upgrades at the Hive for 25 and 40 res. I am not 100% sure though if this "fake" Biomass is usable for upgrades or only as HP extension, though. I think it's the latter.

    Also, T Res cost for alien eggs has been increased:
    Gorge - 10 res
    Lerk - 40 res
    Fade - 70 res
    Onos - 100 res

    This surely combats powerful early lifeform strategies. I didn't pay any attention to whether or not the Biomass requirement for Fade and Onos eggs was changed accordingly, but I assume that was the goal of this change in the end. Still, that is quite a steep investment for pretty fragile lifeforms. May I assume that T Res drops from the marine commander are also increased in price, so we don't get the inflation of 30 T Res Exos?
  • IronHorseIronHorse Developer, QA Manager, Technical Support & contributor Join Date: 2010-05-08 Member: 71669Members, Super Administrators, Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Developer, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Subnautica Playtester, Subnautica PT Lead, Pistachionauts
    biz wrote: »
    you are delusional if you think most NS2 players overclock
    You quoted me verbatim.. but if u actually read that quote, i did not say that. ;)
  • CyberKunCyberKun Join Date: 2013-02-02 Member: 182733Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    Was it removed? I don't see it in the changelogs and those changes are kind of insane, in the bad way.

    If Marines get Exos on 30 res and Aliens get nothing comparable till 70 res, I am so endlessly confused.
  • ZekZek Join Date: 2002-11-10 Member: 7962Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow
    CrushaK wrote: »
    Btw, I didn't see anyone talk about the latest changes:

    You seem to gain 0.1 Biomass levels per alien structure that you build, in addition to the usual upgrades at the Hive for 25 and 40 res. I am not 100% sure though if this "fake" Biomass is usable for upgrades or only as HP extension, though. I think it's the latter.

    Also, T Res cost for alien eggs has been increased:
    Gorge - 10 res
    Lerk - 40 res
    Fade - 70 res
    Onos - 100 res

    This surely combats powerful early lifeform strategies. I didn't pay any attention to whether or not the Biomass requirement for Fade and Onos eggs was changed accordingly, but I assume that was the goal of this change in the end. Still, that is quite a steep investment for pretty fragile lifeforms. May I assume that T Res drops from the marine commander are also increased in price, so we don't get the inflation of 30 T Res Exos?

    Having multiple ways to accumulate biomass is adding too much complexity. The system was already borderline too hard to understand. If anything I would rather that building things was the only way to accumulate biomass.
  • JektJekt Join Date: 2012-02-05 Member: 143714Members, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow
    edited May 2013
    Was there a build with no alien-alien collision? I think I remember it, it was fantastic. Can we have that back?

    edit: Seems to only be the case for the onos?
  • JektJekt Join Date: 2012-02-05 Member: 143714Members, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow
    If the only active BT US server wasn't 24 slot, that would be great.
  • elodeaelodea Editlodea Join Date: 2009-06-20 Member: 67877Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    yea jekt, i think onos collision with skulks and stuff was disabled. But skulk etc. collision with onos was not disabled.
  • xen32xen32 Join Date: 2012-10-18 Member: 162676Members, Reinforced - Supporter
    Shade traits are a very good improvement for vanilla, that's for sure.
  • Marshall_DrumminMarshall_Drummin Join Date: 2012-12-04 Member: 174115Members
    Some things about where the BT mod is right now.

    Marine bullets being bigger.
    -it rewards random hits at long range, because of the loose spread on the rifle
    -instead tighten the rifle spread, and reward true aim

    Fade new movement.
    -heavily reduced stamina
    -slower mid/late game
    -less spectator friendly because of restricted movement
    *I don't think there is anything wrong with vanilla fade movement.

    Skulk new movement.
    -more like pre b240
    -seems good, needs more playtesting, vs accuracy/bigger bullets

    Haven't tried lerk, but I don't think anything is wrong with vanilla lerk, other than the amount of blinding tracers coming at you.
  • halfofaheavenhalfofaheaven Join Date: 2012-11-09 Member: 168660Members, Reinforced - Supporter, Reinforced - Gold
    Just played for a bit again and I completely changed my mind about the movement.

    Fade and Lerk movement is amazing right now and should stay exactly as it is. It's highly responsive and has tons of options. Now while the pseudo bhop thing is very enjoyable for the Fade, Skulk movement is still a little dodgy. The tolerance of how quickly you lose your speed when bumping into things or touching walls (unless it's head-on) needs to be way higher, as there's no way to quickly gain momentum again, at least not until Leap is up.

    As for pretty much all other changes, I say bring 'em on.
  • GadxGadx Join Date: 2003-03-22 Member: 14788Members, Constellation, NS2 Map Tester, Reinforced - Shadow
    Rts hp in general are far too low. You can never respond quickly enough to an attack unless you are in the immediate area.

    New biomass system frees up too much tres for alien the tech trees. Fairly easy to put crags/shifts/shades all over without giving up tech.
  • ezekelezekel Join Date: 2012-11-29 Member: 173589Members, NS2 Map Tester
    Jekt wrote: »
    If the only active BT US server wasn't 24 slot, that would be great.

    This, I'd really love for it to be 18 slots or less, I prefer 16 slots
    elodea wrote: »
    yea jekt, i think onos collision with skulks and stuff was disabled. But skulk etc. collision with onos was not disabled.

    Sounds awesome, I always had a skulk hit me and stop me in my tracks >_>

  • BigRustyRedBigRustyRed Join Date: 2012-11-30 Member: 173786Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    I haven't really been following the discussion here so I´m sorry if this has been talked about.

    We played a match yesterday with the new RT HP / build time changes, I have mixed feelings about this but wanted to post some input.

    The game felt very good to play, it was a lot more fast paced than the current vanilla games we are used to, but perhaps a bit too much so, as marines we didn't really care that we lost a lot of RT's while pushing since a single recapper could recap half of the map in such a short time, also we felt the aliens were at quite a disadvantage since it was hard to setup effective ambushes due to the short building time.

    I think the change is very interesting, the game went from a "slow" tactical positioning feel to a much more action feel, RT's felt less important so the focus was a lot more on attacking specific areas of the map and holding map control then chasing after recappers and defending RTs.

    I think it needs a bit of tweaking, perhaps a 50% drop is too much, but some drop is good, maybe fiddle around with different numbers to see how they feel, longer building times but less HP etc...

    All in all I think the change is good, but if left as it is now it changes the gameplay too much towards just being "another action shooter" rather then a highly tactical positioning game, although its hard to judge from only one game, tactics come with time and trial so it might create a interesting new meta game where RT's play a lesser "attack / defend" role
  • JektJekt Join Date: 2012-02-05 Member: 143714Members, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow
    People should start streaming any organised games on the BT mod and posting them imo. I'm very interested seeing how certain controversial changes play out. How the cheap and low hp extractors work, tres egg drops, 1 cc jetpacks, drifter building, cheap gorges etc. etc.
  • CrazyEddieCrazyEddie Join Date: 2013-01-08 Member: 178196Members
    edited May 2013
    RT's felt less important so the focus was a lot more on attacking specific areas of the map and holding map control then chasing after recappers and defending RTs.

    I haven't played the BT mod yet, but what you've described sounds like a good change to me.

    I get tired of constantly hearing "Skylights!" and "Ventilation!" and "Observation!" and having people running off to go rescue or rebuild them. I try to tell my teammates that the way to save Skylights is to take and hold Overlook. If the current BT makes running after RTs less valuable and encourages tactical play to secure territory, then I'm all for it.
  • AgielAgiel Join Date: 2006-11-14 Member: 58605Members, Constellation, NS2 Playtester, Subnautica Playtester
    edited May 2013
    The problem I have with the lower RT health is that it almost guarantees that the RT will go down before someone can reach it. This by extension means there will be less (meaningful) engagements as people run around each other in circles taking out RTs. Sure, biting or building an RT on your own takes a long time in vanilla and some may call it boring. For me those are some of the most intense moments in the game.
  • ZekZek Join Date: 2002-11-10 Member: 7962Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow
    Well presumably higher mobility means faster response times. Skulks obviously go real fast - marines have permasprint now, not sure how much that helps.
  • AsranielAsraniel Join Date: 2002-06-03 Member: 724Members, Playtest Lead, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow, Subnautica Playtester, Retired Community Developer
    I just played and i really liked it. except for the lower res tower health. it was very frustrating to defend them. But i love running around as skulks, its so much fun to try to improve your movement :) good work
  • xen32xen32 Join Date: 2012-10-18 Member: 162676Members, Reinforced - Supporter
    Yea, I must say, I've been a skulk at (empty) terminal, two marines came by and I did something I couldn't since 240 due to decreased speed - running up the wall, leaping long distance to bite a marine, leaping on the wall, dodging fire for some time to regain health and then repeating it until both marines are dead. It's the speed that allows to do those things quickly, disorient enemies and make me feel ultra-awesome. This feeling is now gone in vanilla, you will probably die as soon as you start climbing a wall.

    Also, I have a complaint. Sewlek's aim is too good, it pushes balance towards marine side.
Sign In or Register to comment.