Starcraft2 delayed
locallyunscene
Feeder of Trolls Join Date: 2002-12-25 Member: 11528Members, Constellation
<div class="IPBDescription">is NS2 next?</div>Please don't take this the wrong way. It's almost the beginning of "Fall 09" and we haven't seen an alpha yet. I'm not complaining; I want the game done right and if that takes a delay that's fine by me. I think that if you're going to make an announcement, now's your best opportunity. I just don't want to hear about a delay midway through October or November. I'd much rather hear it sooner rather than later and I think most of the community would agree.
Maybe I'm completely wrong and you have reasonable confidence of hitting your release window. It's just a concern I thought I'd voice.
Maybe I'm completely wrong and you have reasonable confidence of hitting your release window. It's just a concern I thought I'd voice.
Comments
I think NS2 will be coming this year, maybe even late fall. It really all depends on how much resources they have available to them.
Ofcourse, they haven't shown much. Maybe they've done more than we think
<!--quoteo(post=1721888:date=Aug 10 2009, 04:27 PM:name=Sirot)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sirot @ Aug 10 2009, 04:27 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1721888"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Why is Starcraft 2 mentioned at all? To be more accurate, half of the entire 2009 holiday releases have been pushed in 2010. Mostly because Modern Warfare 2 is going to sell like gang busters.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You watch "Invisible Walls" too?
Alpha for Summer 09 is looking more and more unlikely, but I do hope they prove me wrong :)
People keep saying the same things "we could give them a bit more time", " there funds is being increased"; in reality both statements are utter garbage.
It's not up to the public or a buyer to allow UWE time to develop their game. You're buying a product, if it gets delayed or released at a time unsuitable to you then tough. That's called being a consumer.
The funds pot essentially is not being increased. It would be extremely risky to be running on empty then living off sold product fee's in order to keep afloat. The implications of doing such and then failing are so much more massive that you would rather fail in the first instance.