Post your Engine Test FPS
Onionknight
Join Date: 2010-03-28 Member: 71103Members
Join Date: 2010-03-28 Member: 71103Members
<div class="IPBDescription">Lets just see how everyone is coping with the test</div>Computer specs:
* AMD Athlon II X4 620 OC @ ~3.2 Ghz
* MSI 790X-G45 ATX AM3 DDR3 CROSSFIRE
* Patriot Sector 5 Viper II 4GB DDR3 -1333
* 500 GB Seagate 7200 rpm SATA2 HD
* Antec Earthwatts 650W
* XFX Radeon HD 5770 1 GB DDR5
_______________________________________________
<u>Running at 1280 x 1024 on Windows 7 64 bit</u>
On High Settings:
40-73 fps
Absolutely horrible settings:
63-90 fps
________________________________________________
Lol I can't imagine how crazy the fps would be during actual gameplay. If I may say this game looks a lot more demanding than what the requirements posted @_@. Looking at the requirements stated:
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->1.2 GHz Processor, 256MB RAM, a DirectX 9 level graphics card, Windows Vista/2000/XP, mouse, keyboard and an internet connection.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It should probably be around -> 2.8 GHz Processor, 1 GB RAM, and ______ or better video card.
* AMD Athlon II X4 620 OC @ ~3.2 Ghz
* MSI 790X-G45 ATX AM3 DDR3 CROSSFIRE
* Patriot Sector 5 Viper II 4GB DDR3 -1333
* 500 GB Seagate 7200 rpm SATA2 HD
* Antec Earthwatts 650W
* XFX Radeon HD 5770 1 GB DDR5
_______________________________________________
<u>Running at 1280 x 1024 on Windows 7 64 bit</u>
On High Settings:
40-73 fps
Absolutely horrible settings:
63-90 fps
________________________________________________
Lol I can't imagine how crazy the fps would be during actual gameplay. If I may say this game looks a lot more demanding than what the requirements posted @_@. Looking at the requirements stated:
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->1.2 GHz Processor, 256MB RAM, a DirectX 9 level graphics card, Windows Vista/2000/XP, mouse, keyboard and an internet connection.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It should probably be around -> 2.8 GHz Processor, 1 GB RAM, and ______ or better video card.
Comments
i can run bc2 on max with 40fps consistant on my hd5770 (great card btw), ns2 should have better frames. the engine is nice but not quite optimized yet.
There are probably a lot of driver/vendor-specific inconsistencies happening right now. I'm sure they'll be resolved in time; that's really the point of the engine test.
All that said, the human eye doesn't notice much of an improvement past 60 FPS. After 120 it's literally physically impossible to detect a difference. If you're getting ~60, the game plays fine. Any choppiness you notice past that point is just hypochondria.
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->CASE<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: COOLER MASTER Centurion 590 RC-590-KKN1-GP Black
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->OPTICAL<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: LITE-ON Black CD/DVD Burner
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->MEMORY<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 6GB (3 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->CPU<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: Intel Core i7-930 Bloomfield 2.8GHz
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->PSU<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: CORSAIR CMPSU-650TX 650W ATX12V / EPS12V
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->GPU<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: XFX HD-587X-ZNFC Radeon HD 5870 1GB 256-bit DDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->HDD<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: Western Digital Caviar Blue WD5000AAKS 500GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5"
<!--coloro:orange--><span style="color:orange"><!--/coloro-->HS/F<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->: COOLER MASTER Hyper 212 Plus
On average I would say it was around 65-85, however in some areas where the view included more detailed/larger rooms in the maps, it would drop to as low as the 40s.
Running it at full detail @ 2048x1152, Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate.
I have to agree with the general sentiment here. This is PRE-alpha. Optimizations probably aren't really even in the works at this point and so it's probably safe to assume far greater performance across the board in the retail version.
amd4000+, 7800gtx, 3gbram, 1920x1200 - struggles even on lowest settings (would say 5-10fps).
core2duo something, 8600gt, 4gbram 1680x1050 -struggles on high settings (about 10-20fps)
Didn't expect either of these to handle to very well anyway. Planning on upgrading regardless of how many FPS I got because I want to play on maxed out settings when the final version is released.
As for the lol system requirements posted by UWE - devs always post these ridiculously low settings as "requirements" - meaning whatever is required to install the game and load a map :P If you actually want to PLAY the game best to look at "recommended" specs.
i5 520M
1gb 5730m
4gb DDR3 RAM
Windows 7 64 bit
Running on full detail at 1366 x 768 average FPS was ~40-50, with the lowest drop I saw to 25.
Good stuff UWE!
* Intel i7 920 4.2Ghz
* Asus P6X58D Premium
* Corsair dominator DDR3 6Ghz - 2000
* 320 GB WD Velociraptor x2 Raid 0
* OCZ 700w PSU
* ATi Sapphire 5870 HD 900/1300
_____________________________________________
<u>Running at 1920 x 1080 on Windows 7 Ultimate 64Bit</u>
Only tried on high settings
86-120 FPS
Very stable game and this is the alpha go on guys show EA how its done rub it in there faces muhahaha
(Oh by the way if you minimize and try and go back in it just sits on a black screen but you can shoot ^^)
p.s Dam looking at my fps compared to others it seems to adore my pc *hugs pc case* Good girl
Motherboard: Asus P5K Pro
Memory: 2x2GB A-Data DDR2
GFX Card: 8800GTS 512MB
OS: W7 Ultimate x32 stripped of processes useless to gaming
Drivers: Forceware 196.21
Resolution: 800x600
High settings:
60-80fps with occasional drops to 50
Medium settings:
60-90fps with occasional drops to 55
50 FPS for most areas, some will give 40, on very rare occasion 30, regardless of settings.
If there's lots of optimisation work still ahead - which, if I remember the design document, there should be next to none at this point - or if there's just some bugs, it could be no biggie. Otherwise I am disappoint.
5850
4gig ram
30-70fps on 1680x1050 windowed mode high detail.
We all have 40/50~ fps with a classic config, with some fps drops sometimes. There's no way the game will be this way fps wise the day it goes out.
4GB RAM
512Mb 9800GT
25-60.
HD 4890 1gb
774 quad 2.33
3.25 DDR2
7200rpm HD
40-45 FPS @ 2048 x 1152 on high settings
My system is unoptimized right now but I guess the resolution kills me mostly.
2 Gigs of RAM
PNY nVidia Gefore 9800 GT 1 GB (XLR8 Special Edition)
Running Windows Vista Home Premium (SP1)
1024 x 768 (This is the resolution I play all my games at.)
High Detail I average 40 fps. I have seen no lower than 20 fps and sometimes I get as high as 70 fps but this is very rare.
Cheers,
Cody
ATI Radeon HD 4770 (512 MB)
2 gb ram
1440*900
xp
~15 fps
4gb RAM
Geforce 9800 GT
800x600 HIGH
----------
Most of the time it's between 48-71, but does drop from time to time to 31fps~
1240x768 HIGH
-----------
Pretty much the same, between 45 and 71, even in the same areas where the FPS drops only goes to about 30fps.
9600 GT 512MB
2x 2GB DDR2-1066
1920x1200 (all settings high): 30-45FPS
* AMD Athlon II X4 620 OC @ ~3.2 Ghz
* MSI 790X-G45 ATX AM3 DDR3 CROSSFIRE
* Patriot Sector 5 Viper II 4GB DDR3 -1333
* 500 GB Seagate 7200 rpm SATA2 HD
* Antec Earthwatts 650W
* XFX Radeon HD 5770 1 GB DDR5
_______________________________________________
<u>Running at 1280 x 1024 on Windows 7 64 bit</u>
On High Settings:
40-73 fps
Absolutely horrible settings:
63-90 fps
________________________________________________
Lol I can't imagine how crazy the fps would be during actual gameplay. If I may say this game looks a lot more demanding than what the requirements posted @_@. Looking at the requirements stated:
It should probably be around -> 2.8 GHz Processor, 1 GB RAM, and ______ or better video card.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
man noone still has 256 ram and 1gz processor, everyones got a duo/quad core running at at least 2gz, if they dont, they dnt deserve to play the game imo, i got a quad core Q9300 @ 2.5gz and 4gb ram, 2x 8800gtx, runs fine :D
Intel Core i5-520M 2.4GHz
4GB DDR3 SDRAM 1066Mhz
nVidia GeForce GT 330M GPU
1280x720
Medium
~30 - 45 fps
Dropping to 24 fps briefly at some points
CPU: E8400 3ghz
RAM: 4gb DDR2
Video: 8800GT
Runs 30-60 FPS at high settings. The number is good but there's a lot of stuttering and roughness that isn't reflected in it, especially online(which I realize isn't part of the test).
Memory: 4GB RAM
Video Card: 8800GTS 320mb 320bit
OS: Windows XP SP3
Resolution @ 1280x720 window on Medium fps 30-55, drops sometimes to 24+-
Here's mine:
Amd Athlon64 X2 4200+
2 Gb DDR2 Dual Channel
Radeon 4670 512 Mb
Win 7 x64
1680x1050 High quality settings
<img src="http://i43.tinypic.com/2ustyes.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" />
31,7 fps at Range1 spawn
Lowest Settings
Fps 5
13 if looking right into a wall, if im lucky
Sad thing is CoD4 = 40-60+fps in highest setting
My 6 year old cpu...
xp sp3
PenD 2.80 GHz
3gb ddr2
GeForce 6800 256mb
As of right now I get lots of errors, out of video memory, lock ups, crashes, textures not showing, can't see text ingame list goes on and on. COD4 has 10x better graphics if I can get over 60fps on there on highest setting i'm really hoping to get that on this game. As of right now engine test is unplayable.
<b>RAM</b> 6GB DDR3
<b>Video</b> ASUS Readon HD 4870 1GB
Windows 7 64bit
I run it on 1680x1050 on Max settings
and i get like lowest 40 - 70
Average is 60<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Lowest Settings
Fps 5
13 if looking right into a wall, if im lucky
Sad thing is CoD4 = 40-60+fps in highest setting
My 6 year old cpu...
xp sp3
PenD 2.80 GHz
3gb ddr2
GeForce 6800 256mb
As of right now I get lots of errors, out of video memory, lock ups, crashes, textures not showing, can't see text ingame list goes on and on. COD4 has 10x better graphics if I can get over 60fps on there on highest setting i'm really hoping to get that on this game. As of right now engine test is unplayable.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's not that demanding, sounds like there's some sort of incompatibility bug going on.
nVidia GTX 260
2gb Ram
XP, sp 2
Playing on high settings, 1680x1050
35 lowest, average 45, max approx 70-75
Anybody that played the Beta for battlefield bad company may remember how crap the FPS were for the beta, I averaged about 20-25fps on the public released beta (more advanced production than NS currently is) and as soon as they released the optimization patch, I was getting 70+ average.
Bearing in mind NS is nowhere near as hardware intensive as other modern games - the FPS will keep climbing with upcoming releases!
I would prob expect the final FPS to be something inbetween Half-Life 2 and left 4 dead as a direct comparison.
ATI HD4870
4GB Ram
Settings High @ 1680x1050
Using Fraps on Windows 7 x64
<b>Map 1:</b>
Frames: 3281
Time: 60 seconds
Min : 28 fps
Max: 76 fps
Avg: 54.683
<b>Map 2:</b>
Frames: 3119
Time: 60 seconds
Min : 26 fps
Max: 69 fps
Avg: 51.983
It sure needs some tweaking, but it's pretty :) but I need anti-aliasing :P
Single Core CPU
AMD Anthlon 64 Proccessor
Nvidia Geforce 7600 GT
Integrated RAMDAC
Windows home ed. build 2600
So, any ideas?
UPDATE: I now will recieve the following message when I try running Range #2.
<insert texture name here> failed to create - Out of video memory.
My card has 256 MB of space. Any ideas?