Windows Vista B1 Previews

2»

Comments

  • PithlitPithlit Join Date: 2003-05-07 Member: 16120Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    Well, i don´t think that vista is the best choice for a name.
    Lets have a look what urbandictionary says to this:
    <a href='http://vista.urbanup.com/673284' target='_blank'>Urban dic.</a>

    <!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->A state of being **** up passed "Mega Baked". So baked that you are near retarded!<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
  • cshank4cshank4 Join Date: 2003-02-11 Member: 13425Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-OttoDestruct+Jul 30 2005, 07:43 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (OttoDestruct @ Jul 30 2005, 07:43 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Keep in mind theyre asking a minimum 512 mb ram, recommended 1gb. I might try OSX instead once its out for x86.... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Not gonna happen.
  • OttoDestructOttoDestruct Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7790Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-cshank4+Jul 30 2005, 07:52 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (cshank4 @ Jul 30 2005, 07:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-OttoDestruct+Jul 30 2005, 07:43 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (OttoDestruct @ Jul 30 2005, 07:43 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Keep in mind theyre asking a minimum 512 mb ram, recommended 1gb. I might try OSX instead once its out for x86.... <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Not gonna happen. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    What? OSX? Er... it already exists ? Theyve said it's existed since OSX existed, they've just been waiting to make the switch.
  • CForresterCForrester P0rk(h0p Join Date: 2002-10-05 Member: 1439Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin-Cyndane+Jul 30 2005, 07:44 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Cyndane @ Jul 30 2005, 07:44 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Hehe... I'm hoping they include MS antispyware with this Vista as that would make it that much hotter. :-) <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    It's gonna be in a bundle with a virus scanner and a better firewall than the built-in one, called OneCare.

    <!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->The transparency in the titlebars and toolbars is distracting. I hope that will have an "off" toggle.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    It definitely will.

    <!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Keep in mind theyre asking a minimum 512 mb ram, recommended 1gb. I might try OSX instead once its out for x86....<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    There's really no excuse for not having 1 GB of RAM, if you're a hardcore gamer... And the 512 MB minimum looks like it's only if you want the special effects on. I'm sure that you could get by with 256 MB if you go for the Windows Classic look and turn off Aero/Aero Glass.
  • Lt_PatchLt_Patch Join Date: 2005-02-07 Member: 40286Members
    edited July 2005
    Rant incoming...

    For all the bitching that the penguin-lovers have been putting up, time for a realists POV...

    Personally, I can't wait for "Longhorn", or "Vista" to go gold, and ship to the world. Anything that Microsoft has produced since Windows 95 has had a rough time, but has ultimately proven to be a success. Not because the software is flawed in any way, no, but because of the END USERS. They are the real ****ups in the world, not the software, or the people who probe the holes in the operating system, but the people who actually use the PC. When the fanboys realise that it's not actually Microsoft's fault that their software is hit by just over 110000 viruses at the current time. Only about 10000 of them at the most are viruses that cannot be stopped by user intervention. The remianing hundred thousand or so are counting on the one weak link in the system.

    The Almighty ****up.

    The End User...

    It's these ruthless bastards that come along, and download their crap from the internet, from Peer to Peer networks, and actually open every single flipping attachment, without any regard for any potential damage.

    Then it's up to us guys, the heroes. Those of us in Tech Support, who have to mop up the filthy flipping remains of these PCs, and what little is salvageable of their data, AND the flipping random porn that caused the flipping problem in the first flipping place.

    Even after we clear up the mess, and get it back up and running, IT'S STILL OUR flipping FAULT FOR NOT TELLING YOU TO NOT OPEN AN ATTACHMENT THAT READS "I AM A VIRUS.EXE". Jesus-flipping-Christ, you bunch of twats. You never taught how to flipping read?!

    Argh, i'm ranting, people have warned me not to rant...

    Anyhoo, just from the screeny that Caboose has provided us, if they ramp the security up in the new Windows release, then it should be a good thing, as it'll make the end users even more aware of the damage they're going to do to their PC...

    Before all you penguin-lovers jump on me, it's not just Windows users who get viruses, I have to disinfect plenty of Linux boxes too. You lot are just as flipping thick as the Windows End Users...

    *edit replace flipping with the f-bomb, and you get what kind of mood evangelical Linux-fanbois put me in*
  • iFireiFire Join Date: 2002-07-31 Member: 1038Members
    Windows Vista isn't worth the money to buy. It seems like it has no "exceptional" features so far. And with the on coming of Apple, why spend the effort.
  • ThaldarinThaldarin Alonzi&#33; Join Date: 2003-07-15 Member: 18173Members, Constellation
    Er... because you can't play all the games you want as well with Apple as you can windows?
  • iFireiFire Join Date: 2002-07-31 Member: 1038Members
    Why switch from Windows Xp then?
  • CabooseCaboose title = name(self, handle) Join Date: 2003-02-15 Member: 13597Members, Constellation
    That gives me an idea. Since Apple is going x86, and OSX is a *nix based OS, it should theoretically be able to play Windows games with the aid of wine/cedega. This was impossible before because of the differances in PPC and x86 arcitecture, but now, it should be possible.
  • ThaldarinThaldarin Alonzi&#33; Join Date: 2003-07-15 Member: 18173Members, Constellation
    We will still see a performance drop which will still make Windows the better OS for gaming unless programmers code against Windows which I can not see happening.
  • PulsePulse To create, to create and escape. Join Date: 2002-08-29 Member: 1248Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin-Caboose+Aug 1 2005, 04:14 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Caboose @ Aug 1 2005, 04:14 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> That gives me an idea. Since Apple is going x86, and OSX is a *nix based OS, it should theoretically be able to play Windows games with the aid of wine/cedega. This was impossible before because of the differances in PPC and x86 arcitecture, but now, it should be possible. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Too bad wine/cedega isn't even close to being a substitute for Windows.
Sign In or Register to comment.