<!--QuoteBegin-Spacer+Jul 15 2005, 07:43 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Spacer @ Jul 15 2005, 07:43 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> It could well be the US Military. They seem to have a thing for friendly fire ;D;D;D. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> No, you see then the guy would have to be a group of British soldiers, and the gun would have to be an A-10 Tankbuster.
Oh and the pilot would have to be an american using an anti-tank gun to shoot people (whether friend or foe).
<!--QuoteBegin-Spacer+Jul 15 2005, 07:43 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Spacer @ Jul 15 2005, 07:43 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> It could well be the US Military. They seem to have a thing for friendly fire ;D;D;D. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Well, it's understandable, seeing as everybody else has a history of NO fire.
Comments
No, you see then the guy would have to be a group of British soldiers, and the gun would have to be an A-10 Tankbuster.
Oh and the pilot would have to be an american using an anti-tank gun to shoot people (whether friend or foe).
Well, it's understandable, seeing as everybody else has a history of NO fire.