7200 Rpm Vs 5400 Rpm
<div class="IPBDescription">Hard drives...</div> Okay, so here's my situation, I'm getting only like 6400 3dmarks on 3dmark2k3 on my computer which I just built recently after saving up for awhile. Which should be getting around 7000+. Here's my layout
Pentium 2.4c @3.4 ghz
p4c800 motherboard
Asus radeon 9800 pro (with flashed XT bios, asus uses the same chips and everything for pro and xt, so you can just flash it)
512 mb pc3200
A pretty ancient 40 gb 5400 rpm western digital HD
Now before you ask, im using the latest drivers for everything, already reformatted, already flashed it (my vga card) down to 9800pro to see if that changes anything, it didn't (except my score dropped considerably). Other system with the same or slower setup are getting upwards of the 7000 point benchmark, and the only real bottleneck I could think of was my old HD. So what I'm asking is, before I pull out the money to go buy a new one instead of getting a new cooler for my Video card, would the diffrence between a newer 7200 rpm HD and my one now really be that big? Could it possibly be my problem?
Pentium 2.4c @3.4 ghz
p4c800 motherboard
Asus radeon 9800 pro (with flashed XT bios, asus uses the same chips and everything for pro and xt, so you can just flash it)
512 mb pc3200
A pretty ancient 40 gb 5400 rpm western digital HD
Now before you ask, im using the latest drivers for everything, already reformatted, already flashed it (my vga card) down to 9800pro to see if that changes anything, it didn't (except my score dropped considerably). Other system with the same or slower setup are getting upwards of the 7000 point benchmark, and the only real bottleneck I could think of was my old HD. So what I'm asking is, before I pull out the money to go buy a new one instead of getting a new cooler for my Video card, would the diffrence between a newer 7200 rpm HD and my one now really be that big? Could it possibly be my problem?
Comments
and watch pagefile usage during the 3dmark test. the only reason a slow hdd would slow down tht benchmark is if the computer has to use the pagefile, try disabling it entirely for one run, then try a huge value for the size of the pagefile.
then, go buy a raptor.
But you will definately notice an overall performance improvement when going from 5400 to 7200. And I'm not talking just games, I'm talking everything. Windows will load faster, so will all your applications. Hell you don't even need a benchmark for it, you'll notice it right away.
Would our cooling fans that are on the processor and in the case be that different?
In summary, it could be a ton of things. Don't worry about it though unless yours is screwing up. :P
WUB!
Hell the highest ATA drive ive seen is 7200, the highest scsi ive seen is 10k and that was pretty pricey.
Love to know where you get one of these 15k RPM ones lol
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Ok.. I know this is a bit off topic but you guys are the computer gurus when it comes to smaller things working. Why is his running at 100 degrees and mine is running around 80 to 85 at idle and 90 when under a full load... I have a pentium 4 3.2ghz... :-)
Would our cooling fans that are on the processor and in the case be that different?<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
His processer is only a 2.4ghz P4 overclocked to 3.4ghz the downside is the massive heat problems you get, to deal with such an huge jump he most likely has a nice cooling system, water, vapour or liquid nitrogen lol <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
On a small note people also say overclocking doesnt hurt the CPU if you have proper heat management, yet you still reduce the working life of your processor. Plus if you get it wrong and ya CPU goes thier is a good chance you are gonna fry the MB along with it.
A 15k scuzzy isn't as fast as an ATA 7200, trust me
pshhh. Eardrums aren't worth my time anyways.
Thanks Doom and Jasp.
Cost wise, a good solution can be two medium size drives in a RAID, which win2k and winXP support without any extra software or hardware (and if you're using windows at all, there's no excuse to use 98 or ME). Even two 5400RPMs turn out pretty fast that way. Just make sure they're the same size. That will be much much cheaper than comparible size with 10k RPM. You need hardware support to have the OS installed on a RAID drive, but if you have a recent mobo it should have it built in. So, if you've got many gigs of games and apps sitting around, this would be a great way to speed them up.
Or, you could get a dinky 10kRPM drive and stick your swap file and OSes on it, and your system will still run a lot faster. Great way to spend $40 or so.