<!--quoteo(post=1609137:date=Feb 24 2007, 10:30 PM:name=emperor_awesome)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperor_awesome @ Feb 24 2007, 10:30 PM) [snapback]1609137[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> Dear god don't use download accelerator anyway. Just save yourself the heartache and get broadband. <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, I have broadband, and so does my buddy. Hes noticed a good increase in his download speed, so I'm downloading it as well. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tounge.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p" border="0" alt="tounge.gif" />
<!--quoteo(post=1609250:date=Feb 25 2007, 07:23 PM:name=Sonic)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sonic @ Feb 25 2007, 07:23 PM) [snapback]1609250[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> Or you could just use..y'know. Flashget + the FF plugin for it. <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Flashget is the plugin, Flashgot is the program. I use Flashget and Free Download Manager, both work fine >.>
<!--quoteo(post=1609256:date=Feb 26 2007, 02:47 AM:name=Rover)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rover @ Feb 26 2007, 02:47 AM) [snapback]1609256[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> Flashget is the plugin, Flashgot is the program. I use Flashget and Free Download Manager, both work fine >.> <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo(post=1609630:date=Feb 27 2007, 12:41 PM:name=Mouse)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mouse @ Feb 27 2007, 12:41 PM) [snapback]1609630[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> I love that the deciding factor was a typo. <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Would you invite an applicant, who describes himself as "extremly" good at spelling? <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink-fix.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink-fix.gif" />
<!--quoteo(post=1609633:date=Feb 27 2007, 01:01 PM:name=emperor_awesome)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperor_awesome @ Feb 27 2007, 01:01 PM) [snapback]1609633[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> Only if <i>she</i> was extremly good looking as well <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> fixed
<!--quoteo(post=1609637:date=Feb 27 2007, 01:20 PM:name=emperor_awesome)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperor_awesome @ Feb 27 2007, 01:20 PM) [snapback]1609637[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> Hey buddy I don't swing that way <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> we didnt want to know this :<
ShockehIf a packet drops on the web and nobody's near to see it...Join Date: 2002-11-19Member: 9336NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators, Constellation
I'd like to know <b>how</b> exactly, it allows my xDSL to increase in speed. Do they deploy pixies to the Telco RAS, carrying my packets with love & care to & from the Internet?
Or perhaps it's just one big pile of steaming code.
If a server only allows, say, 100kbps, and you use 10 connections, but your bandwidth limit is, say 512kbps, you'll still get 450 in stead of 100 or so. It just asks for several connections for one file basically.
<!--quoteo(post=1609631:date=Feb 27 2007, 06:45 AM:name=Faskalia)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Faskalia @ Feb 27 2007, 06:45 AM) [snapback]1609631[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> Would you invite an applicant, who describes himself as "extremly" good at spelling? <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink-fix.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink-fix.gif" /> <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, I wouldn't settle for less than extremly better.
<!--quoteo(post=1609691:date=Feb 27 2007, 06:36 PM:name=ZupiCo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ZupiCo @ Feb 27 2007, 06:36 PM) [snapback]1609691[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> No, I wouldn't settle for less than extremly better. <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> So "extremly" best would be acceptable?
Zig...I am Captain Planet!Join Date: 2002-10-23Member: 1576Members
<!--quoteo(post=1609695:date=Feb 27 2007, 09:56 AM:name=Faskalia)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Faskalia @ Feb 27 2007, 09:56 AM) [snapback]1609695[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> So "extremly" best would be acceptable? <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> In before doubleplus good
<!--quoteo(post=1609706:date=Feb 27 2007, 10:35 AM:name=Zig)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Zig @ Feb 27 2007, 10:35 AM) [snapback]1609706[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> In before doubleplus good <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Doubleplus good and "extremly best" are two entirely different concepts. Doubleplus good is gramatically fine in Newspeak, whereas extremly best is just as broken as "extremly better" or anything else like that. Doubleplus good would be analogous to "very good" or even "very very good" but just because both it and the broken phrase mean approximately the same thing doesn't mean they're comparable any more than any normal English expression about goodness or greatness would be with "extremly good."
<!--quoteo(post=1609689:date=Feb 27 2007, 09:34 AM:name=Rover)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Rover @ Feb 27 2007, 09:34 AM) [snapback]1609689[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> If a server only allows, say, 100kbps, and you use 10 connections, but your bandwidth limit is, say 512kbps, you'll still get 450 in stead of 100 or so. It just asks for several connections for one file basically. <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, so download accelerators basically just steal bandwidth from the site.
Doubleplus good and "extremly best" are two entirely different concepts. Doubleplus good is gramatically fine in Newspeak, whereas extremly best is just as broken as "extremly better" or anything else like that. Doubleplus good would be analogous to "very good" or even "very very good" but just because both it and the broken phrase mean approximately the same thing doesn't mean they're comparable any more than any normal English expression about goodness or greatness would be with "extremly good." <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> In before doubleplus best
Also, this thread has broken the sacred laws of the land, for it is not yet <a href="http://img442.imageshack.us/my.php?image=caturcensortx0.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/8185/caturcensortx0.th.jpg" border="0" alt="IPB Image" /></a>
Zig...I am Captain Planet!Join Date: 2002-10-23Member: 1576Members
<!--quoteo(post=1610076:date=Feb 28 2007, 02:06 PM:name=Bloo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Bloo @ Feb 28 2007, 02:06 PM) [snapback]1610076[/snapback]</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--> Someone should make a funny picture tread... <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Well if it's anything like this thread, we already had a 4chan thread a while back.
Comments
Dear god don't use download accelerator anyway. Just save yourself the heartache and get broadband.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, I have broadband, and so does my buddy. Hes noticed a good increase in his download speed, so I'm downloading it as well. <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tounge.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p" border="0" alt="tounge.gif" />
It's not even "extremely faster." It's extremly faster.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Wow, I didn't even notice that.
I'm uninstalling this right now.
Or you could just use..y'know. Flashget + the FF plugin for it.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Flashget is the plugin, Flashgot is the program. I use Flashget and Free Download Manager, both work fine >.>
Flashget is the plugin, Flashgot is the program. I use Flashget and Free Download Manager, both work fine >.>
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You got that the wrong way around, my boy.
<a href="http://www.flashget.com/en/download.htm" target="_blank">http://www.flashget.com/en/download.htm</a>
Wow, I didn't even notice that.
I'm uninstalling this right now.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I love that the deciding factor was a typo.
I love that the deciding factor was a typo.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Would you invite an applicant, who describes himself as "extremly" good at spelling?
<img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink-fix.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink-fix.gif" />
Only if <i>she</i> was extremly good looking as well
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
fixed
Hey buddy I don't swing that way
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
we didnt want to know this :<
Or perhaps it's just one big pile of steaming code.
Would you invite an applicant, who describes himself as "extremly" good at spelling?
<img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink-fix.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink-fix.gif" />
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, I wouldn't settle for less than extremly better.
No, I wouldn't settle for less than extremly better.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So "extremly" best would be acceptable?
So "extremly" best would be acceptable? <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
In before doubleplus good
In before doubleplus good
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Doubleplus good and "extremly best" are two entirely different concepts. Doubleplus good is gramatically fine in Newspeak, whereas extremly best is just as broken as "extremly better" or anything else like that. Doubleplus good would be analogous to "very good" or even "very very good" but just because both it and the broken phrase mean approximately the same thing doesn't mean they're comparable any more than any normal English expression about goodness or greatness would be with "extremly good."
If a server only allows, say, 100kbps, and you use 10 connections, but your bandwidth limit is, say 512kbps, you'll still get 450 in stead of 100 or so. It just asks for several connections for one file basically.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah, so download accelerators basically just steal bandwidth from the site.
Yeah, so download accelerators basically just steal bandwidth from the site.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I delcare this thread requiring more KITTENS.
<img src="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/8558/11644716445465ao1.jpg" border="0" alt="IPB Image" />
<img src="http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/738/2006112516024yw8.jpg" border="0" alt="IPB Image" />
Also... In response to emperor awesomes post...
<img src="http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/6494/2006112515041ww8.jpg" border="0" alt="IPB Image" />
Yeah, so download accelerators basically just steal bandwidth from the site.
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeap.
Doubleplus good and "extremly best" are two entirely different concepts. Doubleplus good is gramatically fine in Newspeak, whereas extremly best is just as broken as "extremly better" or anything else like that. Doubleplus good would be analogous to "very good" or even "very very good" but just because both it and the broken phrase mean approximately the same thing doesn't mean they're comparable any more than any normal English expression about goodness or greatness would be with "extremly good." <!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
In before doubleplus best
Also, this thread has broken the sacred laws of the land, for it is not yet
<a href="http://img442.imageshack.us/my.php?image=caturcensortx0.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/8185/caturcensortx0.th.jpg" border="0" alt="IPB Image" /></a>
Well if it's anything like this thread, we already had a 4chan thread a while back.