<!--quoteo(post=1949859:date=Jul 8 2012, 11:09 AM:name=AuroN2)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AuroN2 @ Jul 8 2012, 11:09 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1949859"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Sorry but.. what? How the hell is 35 expensive? Thats cheap as chips, even if you dont work!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> An often made statement, and partially true I guess (though I won't be too quick to dismiss poverty). Another way you could look at this, is that those 35$ could've gone to another (more deserving) developer. Not saying this is the case with NS2, but there exists a finite amount of money in people's pockets (unless you live in the US where it is only limited to how fast it can be printed by the Fed), and money spent on a game that doesn't deserve it, is money lost to another game(-developer) that did.
(unless you live in the US where it is only limited to how fast it can be printed by the Fed) ..
Hahah you'r totaly right!! And make me smile, US economy is dead only survive by what they call quantitaty easing meaning "planche a billet" :D FED is the doctor who maintain in life the us economy by printing more thant 100m dollard everydays, toilet paper .....
Whereas in threads about the actual game (topics that should be serviced on a beta forum), threads get closed when people disagree with the party line.
Because discussing the actual problems of this game is tantamount to talking to a wall, the moderators realise this and try and save us the trouble. Be thankful.
<!--quoteo(post=1949893:date=Jul 8 2012, 11:01 AM:name=player)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (player @ Jul 8 2012, 11:01 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1949893"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Because discussing the actual problems of this game is tantamount to talking to a wall, the moderators realise this and try and save us the trouble. Be thankful.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ah, good point. I think the game should be $32 for the following well-researched reasons:
Comments
An often made statement, and partially true I guess (though I won't be too quick to dismiss poverty). Another way you could look at this, is that those 35$ could've gone to another (more deserving) developer. Not saying this is the case with NS2, but there exists a finite amount of money in people's pockets (unless you live in the US where it is only limited to how fast it can be printed by the Fed), and money spent on a game that doesn't deserve it, is money lost to another game(-developer) that did.
Hahah you'r totaly right!! And make me smile, US economy is dead only survive by what they call quantitaty easing meaning "planche a billet" :D FED is the doctor who maintain in life the us economy by printing more thant 100m dollard everydays, toilet paper .....
We have people saying things like this:
<!--quoteo(post=1949882:date=Jul 8 2012, 10:04 AM:name=assbda)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (assbda @ Jul 8 2012, 10:04 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1949882"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->get a ###### job<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Whereas in threads about the actual game (topics that should be serviced on a beta forum), threads get closed when people disagree with the party line.
Seems silly!
Ah, good point.
I think the game should be $32 for the following well-researched reasons: