Can We Have A Place To Discuss Ns:source?

Tasty

<div class="IPBDescription">becuse it keeps coming up,</div> I know that the team has said that they will make the decision whether or not to do it when they are ready.

But can we have a thread, maybe in the Ideas and suggestions forum just to discuss, speculate and come up with ideas for NS:Source?

DragonMech

Check the stickies - there is one there already.

(Go go Zunni's psychic powers!)

BobTheJanitor

For the amazingly lazy or inept: <a href='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83486' target='_blank'>Here</a> is a link. (Don't feel bad, I myself am also inept and lazy.)

Mad_ivans

I would not even say it, for people have it edged towards their sanity too many times that is safe and calm

Drummer

i dont think theres anything we can do to prevent the inevitable. n00bs will always come to this forum and ask "the question which no one shall speak". cause they wont read the webbed, and they wont use the search button.

taboofires

Really now, the engine has little to do with how fun a game is. I'd much rather the devs spend their time making NS awesome then learning a new engine and redoing all their hard work.

Sky

Well.....I would say that. No game will ever be LESS fun on a better engine, so upgrading the engine can only boost the game as a whole; furthermore, a better engine allows the dev team to include more of the kinds of far-out suggestions that are obviously unrealistic for NS right now, but would still be really fun to play with.....

crisano

<!--QuoteBegin-5kyh16h91+Oct 22 2004, 04:27 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (5kyh16h91 @ Oct 22 2004, 04:27 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Well.....I would say that. No game will ever be LESS fun on a better engine, so upgrading the engine can only boost the game as a whole; furthermore, a better engine allows the dev team to include more of the kinds of far-out suggestions that are obviously unrealistic for NS right now, but would still be really fun to play with..... <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Doom 3 was a big disappointment for me compared to the previous Dooms. The new engine was kickass, I definately won't disagree with that. But I found that Doom 2 was a lot more exciting, nailbiting, and a helluva lot longer than Doom3, which equals to a lot more fun and entertaining for me.

EDIT: Of course this is all in my opinion, I'm sure others would disagree. But games in general, in my view, I see that gameplay has been drastically receding because most games seem to be focused on how hardcore and awesome they can make their graphics.

Drummer

<!--QuoteBegin-5kyh16h91+Oct 22 2004, 04:27 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (5kyh16h91 @ Oct 22 2004, 04:27 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Well.....I would say that. No game will ever be LESS fun on a better engine, so upgrading the engine can only boost the game as a whole; furthermore, a better engine allows the dev team to include more of the kinds of far-out suggestions that are obviously unrealistic for NS right now, but would still be really fun to play with..... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
like flamethrowers, which we know flayra wants <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->

SaltzBad

<!--QuoteBegin-BobTheJanitor+Oct 22 2004, 10:27 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (BobTheJanitor @ Oct 22 2004, 10:27 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> For the amazingly lazy or inept: <a href='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83486' target='_blank'>Here</a> is a link. (Don't feel bad, I myself am also inept and lazy.) <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
I wouldn't say you're lazy.

BobTheJanitor

<!--QuoteBegin-SaltzBad+Oct 22 2004, 03:52 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (SaltzBad @ Oct 22 2004, 03:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-BobTheJanitor+Oct 22 2004, 10:27 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (BobTheJanitor @ Oct 22 2004, 10:27 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> For the amazingly lazy or inept: <a href='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83486' target='_blank'>Here</a> is a link. (Don't feel bad, I myself am also inept and lazy.) <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I wouldn't say you're lazy. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Master of the backhanded compliment. <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->