Could Combat Maps Have More

Maveric

<div class="IPBDescription">run-time entities then NS maps?</div> A simple question:
Could Combat maps hold more run-time entities (and thus detail) then NS maps, because there are so few buildings in Combat?

I've always assumed that the run-time entity limit was for reducing lag when the commander and alien gorges build their buildings and fortresses... but since there is only one hive, one/two armories, and a command chair and no building abilities on either side, that assumption is struck dead... thus leading to the above question.

So...


Could combat maps have more run-time entities (func_walls -- leading to more detail) then NS maps currently allow due to the lack of structures?

Lt_Gravity

I WONT try it... besides that a decent maps doesnt need thousands of func_whatever´s.

Ron2K

Maveric, the simple answer is NO. Read <a href='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=59708&st=11' target='_blank'>this XP-Cagey post</a> to find out why.

Kester

in short no, but because u make a combat map vastly smaller than a regular ns u can put more detail into anyhoo.

As in ns_ u have ur ents all over the map space, in co_ they are confined therefore allowing more detail into one area