<!--QuoteBegin-Dr_Shaggy+Mar 2 2004, 05:08 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Dr_Shaggy @ Mar 2 2004, 05:08 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-[lljk+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> ([lljk)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Whimsy,Mar 2 2004, 04:16 AM] <!--QuoteBegin-Dr_Shaggy+Mar 1 2004, 10:49 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Dr_Shaggy @ Mar 1 2004, 10:49 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-SkulkBait+Mar 2 2004, 02:34 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (SkulkBait @ Mar 2 2004, 02:34 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-Black Mage+Mar 1 2004, 02:49 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Black Mage @ Mar 1 2004, 02:49 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <b>linuxmonkey?</b> FAT32, it's compatible <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Theres no reason you can't use NTFS here either. Just so long as you don't intend to write to it from linux (technically, you can write to it, but only in so far as modifying a file and not increasing its size). <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> That shouldn't be a problem much longer after a certain release of some source code from somewhere, I'm sure someone is looking at how that works. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Anyone with any intelligence in the Linux community knows better than to touch that source code. Reverse engineering is legal and ethical. Stealing ideas from source code is not. If Linux code were infected with MS Code, then we would have another ****storm not unlike SCO. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Of course they shouldn't copy the code, that'd be pretty dumb. But looking at how its done and coding your own solution would be pretty safe. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Not necessarily. Especially when they make protocols proprietary.
Linux was already making use of the NTFS protocol before the leak, just not that well when writing to the disk. I was just thinking that someone might be able to fix the last couple bugs in it lately. I'm sure it'll be a coincidence.
Comments
FAT32, it's compatible <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Theres no reason you can't use NTFS here either. Just so long as you don't intend to write to it from linux (technically, you can write to it, but only in so far as modifying a file and not increasing its size). <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That shouldn't be a problem much longer after a certain release of some source code from somewhere, I'm sure someone is looking at how that works. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Anyone with any intelligence in the Linux community knows better than to touch that source code. Reverse engineering is legal and ethical. Stealing ideas from source code is not. If Linux code were infected with MS Code, then we would have another ****storm not unlike SCO. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Of course they shouldn't copy the code, that'd be pretty dumb. But looking at how its done and coding your own solution would be pretty safe. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not necessarily. Especially when they make protocols proprietary.