Amx Vs Adminmod

devicenulldevicenull Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15967Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
in General Server Discussion
<div class="IPBDescription">Differences?</div> I know they are different, but what about CPU/memory usage?
I keep hearing that AMX uses more can someone (who has tried both <b>recently</b>) Either verify this, or tell me its wrong?

I hear about people running both, and that would cause high CPU usage

This "high CPU usage" seems to be the reason people are sitcking with adminmod, when amx is far better for ns (in terms of plugins)
Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome

Comments

  • BryBry Join Date: 2003-01-23 Member: 12609Members
    err lets see.

    base amx is lower cpu usage i have found.
    However, becasue amx has like 1000 times mroe plugins which people run it can end up using mroe cpu as a lot of people tend to run a lot of stupid plugins.

    For ns, the abse install of amx is very good with a few plugins <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • styleestylee Join Date: 2003-03-23 Member: 14802Members
    AMX would probably be the way to go just because of all the plugins being written for it (with ns2amx)....I honestly see very few differences between amx and adminmod, and using adminmod has just become a habit for me, but AMX would work out just as well (if not better, depending if you want some of the AMX plugins at modns.org).
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • devicenulldevicenull Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15967Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    AMX works fine, I just wanted to make sure that it doesn't use any more cpu usage then adminmod.. If anyone is running AMX with NS, can you verify this for me?
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
Sign In or Register to comment.