Computer Hardware Update

Ashaman_JoeAshaman_Joe Join Date: 2003-11-11 Member: 22559Members, Constellation
<div class="IPBDescription">Tis the season to get free stuff!</div> This Christmas I plan on having my computer get a hardware overhaul. Unfourtunately, I don't know more beyond bigger numbers=better performance, I am kinda lost on what to get. I have now:

RADEON 9000 64 MB with driver version 6.14.10.6396
AMD Athlon XP 2500+
512 DDR RAM

And have a choice of what to upgrade. I can either get a RADEON 9800 256 MB or an AMD Athlon 64 3200. If I dont do that, I could upgrade both of them and get a RADEON 9600 256 and a AND Athlon 3000. I might be able to add in more RAM to either of them, either 256 DDR or another 512 DDR.

Can anyone help me?

Comments

  • SandrockSandrock Join Date: 2002-12-16 Member: 10905Members, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow
    Personally, I'd go with the video upgrade. The 2500+ is a really good chip and if you get a good motherboard, it can overclock past a 3200+ easily. If you do get the 64bit chip, remember you'll also need a new motherboard.
  • MulletMullet Join Date: 2003-04-28 Member: 15910Members, Constellation
    Get the ati radeon 9800 XT 256mb <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo--> You get a free copy of hl2 if you get it.
  • MajinMajin Join Date: 2003-05-29 Member: 16829Members, Constellation
    Always go for the Processor over the Vid card.
    Only a Nub caek would choose better Video performance over all around better performance.

    But than again you already have an OK Processor, so take the Vid card.
  • Ashaman_JoeAshaman_Joe Join Date: 2003-11-11 Member: 22559Members, Constellation
    We have votes for better Vid Card. Any thoughts on getting slightly better in both over upgrading just one?
  • TenSixTenSix Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7932Members
    Make sure your motherboard can handle the Athalon. Mine can't take anything more then what it has now <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo-->

    I would get both the 9600 and Athalon 3000, its a good combo. Although I would get the Athalon 64 then save up and get one of those spiffy Radeon XT around April next year. Why? Look at it like this:

    -Radeon XT is $400 now.
    -Price drops happens every few months
    -HL2 release date is going to be around April by all indications
    -By April you might be able to get a Radeon XT for $300 plus the HL2 rebate which is essentially saving you $50. So depending on how you look at it, if you wait to upgrade your GFX card you will not only be saving ~$100 but an additional $50 from the HL2 rebate and will be able to run HL2 just fine.
  • SillyGooseSillyGoose Join Date: 2003-03-16 Member: 14572Members, Constellation
    Ram and the radeon. 2500+ is fine, Im running a 1800+ and its great.
  • PseudoKnightPseudoKnight Join Date: 2002-06-18 Member: 791Members
    9800

    Like others said, you have a good processor. Moving to a 3000 wouldn't improve performance much. Getting a Athlon 64 would probably require a new mobo, which is a hassle. Plus, your video card needs upgrading. If you play graphic intensive games at all, the 9800 is the way to go here.
  • Nil_IQNil_IQ Join Date: 2003-04-15 Member: 15520Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--SillyGoose+Nov 27 2003, 04:28 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (SillyGoose @ Nov 27 2003, 04:28 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Ram and the radeon. 2500+ is fine, Im running a 1800+ and its great. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    How much ram do you have exactly? Same processor as me.

    I would go for the processor. Your graphics card can be held back by your processor, but your processor won't be held back by your graphics card (except actually STOPPING you playing some games, but it's a 9000 so I wouldn't worry about that). As far as my limited grasp of a computer's internal workings goes...
  • Ashaman_JoeAshaman_Joe Join Date: 2003-11-11 Member: 22559Members, Constellation
    If I went on to the ATI website, I could look up the difference between PRO/XT/Blah, but their answer wont be that objective. Can you tell me the difference between them?

    I swiched over to STEAM recently, which dropped me from 72 FPS w/custom models to 60 without. May just be a Steam thing, but I'm afraid to add custom models now. I fear for my computer when HL2 comes out...
  • Marik_SteeleMarik_Steele To rule in hell... Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9466Members
    Actually, you <i>can</i> get an objective comparison from ATI, just in terms of technical specifications instead of framerate.
    From <a href='http://apps.ati.com/ATIcompare/' target='_blank'>ATI's comparison tool</a>, comparing the three 128MB models of 9600, the differences are:

    CLOCK SPEED:
    9600: 325e/400m
    9600 pro: 400e/600m
    9600 XT: 500e/600m

    PIXEL FILLRATE:
    9600: 1.3 Gpixels/sec
    9600 pro: 1.6 Gpixels/sec
    9600 XT: 2Gpixels/sec

    GEOMETRY RATE:
    9600: 162.5 Mtriangles/sec
    9600 pro: 200 Mtriangles/sec
    9600 XT: 250 Mtriangles/sec

    all other given stats are equal between the three models.
  • Ashaman_JoeAshaman_Joe Join Date: 2003-11-11 Member: 22559Members, Constellation
    Gah... didn't see that before. Shoot me now. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • TalesinTalesin Our own little well of hate Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7710NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators
    I would heavily suggest the R9800 Pro. Your CPU is quite beefy enough to handle most games out there, but that R9000 is *really* going to be limiting the amount of pretty that gets to your monitor, given that it's a DX8 part. Meaning no pixel shader 2.0 effects, or any of the other beautiful stuff from the R9500+ line.

    And given that I just boosted up to an Ath64 3200+ myself, I'd warn against it for anyone considering making the jump... it's very overpriced for the power it provides, due to the fact that there are NO 64-bit OSen that are really easily available to take advantage of the added architecture. Well... Linux, but very few people are comfy with CLI.

    Though I've seen an Ath64 3200+ with a R9800 XT... PAINFULLY fast.



    Again, go for the video card. Your CPU is sufficient for the time being.
  • Ashaman_JoeAshaman_Joe Join Date: 2003-11-11 Member: 22559Members, Constellation
    So it seems I'll go with the RADEON 9800 XT, possibly with more RAM, unless anyone dissuades me. You still have until sometime near Christmas!

    BTW, how does the Radeon compare with Nvidia?

    TenSix: I can't wait unless I put it off till June. Christmas= influx of money in form of gifts. June= my birthday, and influx of money if form of gifts. I have to upgrade now, or hold my peace for 6 more months (which wont be fun).
  • Marik_SteeleMarik_Steele To rule in hell... Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9466Members
    Nobody in his or her right mind would choose an NVidia card over an ATI card of comparable price and performance. At least not if they intended on playing Half-Life 2, Deus Ex 2, Thief 3, Doom 3, or any other game that will, as Nemesis Zero puts it, "eat fillrates for breakfast." NVidia's current lineup of cards is competitive with ATI with software that uses DirectX 8.1, but move up to DirectX 9 and everyone from John Carmack to Gabe Newell will agree that NVidia simply wasn't building their cards with DX9 in mind the way ATI <i>had</i> to to get themselves competitive again.
  • DarkDudeDarkDude Join Date: 2003-08-06 Member: 19088Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--TenSix+Nov 27 2003, 04:19 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (TenSix @ Nov 27 2003, 04:19 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Make sure your motherboard can handle the Athalon. Mine can't take anything more then what it has now <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo-->

    <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Is there any way to figure out if your mobo can handle a video card without buying the card?

    I'm thinking about upgrading but I'm running off of a pretty old P3 600MHz system so I'm not sure what it can handle. I'm upgrading to an AMD Athalon 2600 Pro if I can. Anyone know how to figure out what motherboard you have? And yes, I am a nub with computers so I don't want to have to tear the damn thing apart. Thanks for any help.
  • DarkDudeDarkDude Join Date: 2003-08-06 Member: 19088Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Ashaman Joe+Nov 27 2003, 09:52 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Ashaman Joe @ Nov 27 2003, 09:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> BTW, how does the Radeon compare with Nvidia?

    <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    ATI(Radeon)>Nvidia(GeForce) hands down.
  • Marik_SteeleMarik_Steele To rule in hell... Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9466Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--DarkDude+Nov 27 2003, 10:04 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (DarkDude @ Nov 27 2003, 10:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--TenSix+Nov 27 2003, 04:19 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (TenSix @ Nov 27 2003, 04:19 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Make sure your motherboard can handle the Athalon. Mine can't take anything more then what it has now <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo-->

    <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Is there any way to figure out if your mobo can handle a video card without buying the card?

    I'm thinking about upgrading but I'm running off of a pretty old P3 600MHz system so I'm not sure what it can handle. I'm upgrading to an AMD Athalon 2600 Pro if I can. Anyone know how to figure out what motherboard you have? And yes, I am a nub with computers so I don't want to have to tear the damn thing apart. Thanks for any help. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Easiest way to find out what your motherboard supports is to check the manual or manufacturer's website for specifications. If you bought it from a company such as Dell, IBM, Sony, Toshiba, Compaq, Emachines, etc. instead of building it yourself, you'll have to navigate that company's website and find your model of computer. You'll also have to pray that they aren't the sort of money-hungry company that intentionally uses hardware that's tough to upgrade, forcing you to buy specific hardware (or even a whole new system) from them.
  • TenSixTenSix Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7932Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--DarkDude+Nov 27 2003, 10:04 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (DarkDude @ Nov 27 2003, 10:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--TenSix+Nov 27 2003, 04:19 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (TenSix @ Nov 27 2003, 04:19 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Make sure your motherboard can handle the Athalon. Mine can't take anything more then what it has now <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo-->

    <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Is there any way to figure out if your mobo can handle a video card without buying the card?

    I'm thinking about upgrading but I'm running off of a pretty old P3 600MHz system so I'm not sure what it can handle. I'm upgrading to an AMD Athalon 2600 Pro if I can. Anyone know how to figure out what motherboard you have? And yes, I am a nub with computers so I don't want to have to tear the damn thing apart. Thanks for any help. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Your likely going to need a whole new motherboard. I have a Athalon XP 1800+ and a MSI VIA Ultra2 motherboard, which isnt very old. And according to MSI's specs I can't run anything more then the 1800+ I have right now. If your computer is OEM (Compaq, Dell, Hewlett Packard) you can pretty much be assured the motherboard won't work with any other proccessors. Either due to the motherboard itself, or other OEM parts. OEMs don't like giving their customers the ability to make a $400 upgrade when they could instead be forced to purchase a new $1000 computer from them.

    You might be able to upgrade of course, usually the Motherboard info is printed right on the board itself. Your not going to get the same speed though due to older/OEM parts.

    Not to mention many older motherboards can't handle DDR RAM, which is required by basically every processor now.

    If your on a system older then 3 or 4 years, you would be better off just buying a whole new system minus whatever parts you could possibly salvage from your old system. Its not as expensive as it sounds. You can usually use some stuff from your old computer and save a good $100-$900:

    -Hard drive, I have an old 8GB drive from a 4 year old computer that I use as a backup and virtual swap. Works fine.
    -CD Drive, usually not top of the line fast, but sufficient for CD to CD copies.
    -Monitor, this will usually save you tons. Sure you won't be getting a shiny new 21' Sony, but Im still using the monitor from my second computer with no problems at all. Plus its a good $200-$900 saved.
    -Mouse & Keyboard, not the most expensive equipment, but alot of builders try to hit you up on everything. Add a 50% markup to a $20 mouse and $20 keyboard and you can see how this can save you a bit.

    You will save alot more money if you buy a bare bones computer with nothing but the essentials, and then buy the rest of the parts yourself either on sale or from Pricewatch.
  • DarkDudeDarkDude Join Date: 2003-08-06 Member: 19088Members
    edited November 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--Marik_Steele+Nov 27 2003, 10:14 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Marik_Steele @ Nov 27 2003, 10:14 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Easiest way to find out what your motherboard supports is to check the manual or manufacturer's website for specifications.  If you bought it from a company such as Dell, IBM, Sony, Toshiba, Compaq, Emachines, etc. instead of building it yourself, you'll have to navigate that company's website and find your model of computer.  You'll also have to pray that they aren't the sort of money-hungry company that intentionally uses hardware that's tough to upgrade, forcing you to buy specific hardware (or even a whole new system) from them. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Ok, thanks, I'll check it out. It is from Dell and, believe it or not, my parents bought it for me so it's got some pretty old tech in a not so old system. Hopefully it'll be able to upgrade without much trouble, hopefully. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo-->

    *Edit* Well, damn, looks like I'm going to need a new system. Since it's from Dell, and after looking at the mobo specs I don't think the upgrades I want are going to work. I guess I can live with this old piece of junk for a little longer, at least until HL2 comes out. Thanks guys.
  • Ashaman_JoeAshaman_Joe Join Date: 2003-11-11 Member: 22559Members, Constellation
    Roger, Nvidia is bad for new games. Got it. When I get home, I'll check how much more RAM my computer can take.

    (Note: this may take 3/4 days, as I am on vacation.)
  • TeoHTeoH Join Date: 2002-12-30 Member: 11640Members
    Echo'ing the rest of the thread, i would go with the video card in your situation. The 9000 you're currently running is an outdated part that will not cut it for any recent game, replacing it with a 9600 or 9800 class card is going to be necessary if you want decent performance in new releases. I would advise against your combined processor + video card upgrade idea, since the jump from an XP2500 to an XP3000 is just not large enough to warrant the cost of replacing the processor. An XP2500 is respectable for the moment, i would leave off upgrading it untill you can make a large enough jump to justify the replacement. I would also advise against buying a 9800 XT for the moment - while they are the fastest cards on the market, this means they also carry a significant price markup, and the relatively minor performance difference between a 9800 pro and a 9800 XT does not justify the extra cash.

    The new videocard may not give you a huge performance boost in NS - but more demanding recent games, and certainly HL2 will love you for it. The videocard upgrade will give you a more dramatic improvement in recent games than your other upgrade options.

    And just to water down some of the hatin on Dell, nobody anywhere makes a motherboard that can support both a P3-600 and an Athlon XP, sorry :)

    To whoever is making that jump, you'll also want new RAM to go with your new motherboard and processor. You may also need a new videocard+soundcard, as it's quite possible your current system uses onboard sound+video. In otherwords, yes your best bet is to just buy a new system, minus the monitor and anything else you can salvage.

    Nvidia's DX9 performance may not be as apocolyptically bad as it's being made out to be (New drivers apparently give a 50-100% performance jump in the DX9 apps the previous drivers were dying in), but i would still go with the ATi cards for the time being, to be on the safe side.
  • TalesinTalesin Our own little well of hate Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7710NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators
    Actually, those performance boosts are due to 'optimizations' of the type nVidia was nailed to the wall for in 3DMark. Namely, cutting color precision on the backend severely... from the 24 bit spec down to 16 or even 12 bits. And while SOME people insist that there's no visible difference, it's painfully obvious when I look between a Radeon and an FX.

    In short, for the moment, ATi are the top performer. nVidia rested on their laurels, not expecting any real competition. ATi busted *ss and came out with a card that spanked them soundly for two entire release revisions. And ATi already had their next component coming out and *on the shelves* before nVidia's 'triumph' card was even shipping tech demo samples.

    Personally I'd still go with the XT if you're already laying out cash... the HL2 voucher cuts fifty bucks off the price (assuming, of course, that you're going to buy HL2 anyway), and you get to laugh at all the slower machines limping along, while you blast your way through the newest games at buttery-smooth framerates.
  • Ashaman_JoeAshaman_Joe Join Date: 2003-11-11 Member: 22559Members, Constellation
    Yes, I am shelling out cash. Partly my parents cash because of Christmas, and partly my own so they shell out their part. And yes, HL2 will be mine. [Evil Laughter]

    50 bucks off the price? Does that imply it will cost MORE than 50 bucks?
Sign In or Register to comment.