Quantum Leap

MonsieurEvilMonsieurEvil Join Date: 2002-01-22 Member: 4Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Contributor
<div class="IPBDescription">Not the lame-o TV program, nub</div> (from The Register: <a href='http://www.theregister.com/content/55/31077.html' target='_blank'>http://www.theregister.com/content/55/31077.html</a> )

Yet again the british invent something cool. Any bets on them squandering it and ultimately being beaten soundly by the rest of the world in actually using it? Like TV, Radio, Computers, etc...

<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->UK boffins have demonstrated unbreakable quantum cryptography over fibre links longer than 100km for the first time.

Researchers at Cambridge-based Toshiba Research Europe say their work paves the way for commercial quantum cryptography systems within three years.

Future development will now be partially funded by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). The focus of the DTI initiative, which also includes the University of Cambridge and Imperial College, London, is to build a quantum cryptography system which is secure from every type of hacking.

Potential users of quantum cryptography include any organisation using IT and communications technology to send, receive and store sensitive information - from banks and retailers to central and local Government organisations.

Dr Andrew Shields, who leads the Toshiba group developing the system, said: "As far as we are aware, this is the first demonstration of quantum cryptography over fibres longer than 100km. These developments show that the technique could be deployed in a wide range of commercial situations within a timeframe of less than three years."

Much of the interest in quantum cryptography stems from the fact that it is fundamentally secure. This contrasts with today's code-based systems which rely on the assumed difficulty of certain mathematical operations. Ultimately, quantum cryptography seeks to deliver a method of communication whose secrecy does not depend upon any assumptions.

Quantum cryptography allows two users on an optical fibre network to form a shared key, the secrecy of which can be guaranteed. This takes advantage of the particle-like nature of light. In quantum cryptography, each transmitted bit is encoded upon a single light particle (or 'photon'). The impossibility of faithfully copying this stream of encoded photons ensures that a hacker can never determine the key without leaving detectable traces of their intervention.

Until now, the major constraint on the appliance of quantum cryptography is that these light particles could be scattered out of the fibre.

In theory, this is not critical as only the tiny fraction of photons that reach the other end are used to form the key. In practice, however, the rate of photons surviving long fibres can be so low that they are masked by the noise in the photon detector.

By developing an ultra-low noise detector, the Toshiba team has been able to demonstrate a system working over much longer fibres than achieved previously.

Professor Michael Pepper, joint MD of Toshiba Research Europe, said: "The advance of semiconductor technology allows us to implement quantum effects which were previously thought to be only theory. One can foresee that this is the beginning of a process which will lead to a revolution in Information processing and transmission."

Toshiba announced it breakthrough at thee global Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) in Baltimore, USA this week. ®
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Comments

  • littlewildlittlewild Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9467Members
    They also mentioned something in NewScientist.com about needing 3 years before it can be mass produced and commercialized.
  • Dr_ShaggyDr_Shaggy Join Date: 2002-09-26 Member: 1340Members, Constellation
    No way did you call the TV show lame
  • DOOManiacDOOManiac Worst. Critic. Ever. Join Date: 2002-04-17 Member: 462Members, NS1 Playtester
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Not the lame-o TV program, nub<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    No way, that show pwnt!

    Ziggy!
  • MonsieurEvilMonsieurEvil Join Date: 2002-01-22 Member: 4Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Contributor
    edited June 2003
    Yes, I am calling that show lame. Because it was really, really lame. There were so many fundamental holes in the science that I would actually have a pain in my stomach when I watched small sections of the show. I'd have to go lie down with a damp towel on my forehead.

    Can we talk about Quantum Cryptography now? It's t3h w1n.
  • SaltySalty Join Date: 2002-11-05 Member: 6970Members
    I didn't know there was a big problem of people taping into goverment phone lines and stuff?

    Oh and that show did suck my sister made me watch it all the time along with both those star trek things the only cool time about that show was when he had to be some old black woman.
  • DY357LXDY357LX Playing since day 1. Still can&#39;t Comm. England Join Date: 2002-10-27 Member: 1651Members, Constellation
    edited June 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--DOOManiac+Jun 9 2003, 12:33 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (DOOManiac @ Jun 9 2003, 12:33 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Not the lame-o TV program, nub<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    No way, that show pwnt!

    Ziggy! <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    As much as I loved that show.... the very last episode was absolute crap!
    I watched it whenever I saw it mentioned in the T.V Guide. Often staying awake til
    2/3am to stick the Sci-Fi channel on in a last ditch effort to see the final
    episode and see what happens to Sam Beckett. And then one day it came,
    after several hundred (seriously) repeats, I was treat...er.. subjected to
    the worst effort episode EVER!
    i won't go into what happened, simply because some people have seen it and don't want
    to know. But I will say this..... I felt like kicking the T.V in and then burning its remains.
  • LikuLiku I, am the Somberlain. Join Date: 2003-01-10 Member: 12128Members
    It seems as though MonsE's been posting articles and quoting them.
  • DOOManiacDOOManiac Worst. Critic. Ever. Join Date: 2002-04-17 Member: 462Members, NS1 Playtester
    You know I never saw the final episode, though I heard it had to do w/ god leaping him around or something.

    Anyone care to spill the beans?
  • Brave_UlyssesBrave_Ulysses Join Date: 2003-04-28 Member: 15922Members
    I saw it - excellent stuff, like the whole series. I forget its title, but I think it had "Mirror" in it. Sam leaps back to the exact day his mum gave birth to him. Al spends ages looking for him as they go up to his first birthday anniversary but not his actual birth day. Sam ends up in a bar where he can see HIMSELF in the mirror. And the chap who played the Airforce head honcho in the first episode appears here as a bartender called Al. He tells Sam everything - that Sam himself has leapt Sam around intime and that he can stop anytime he wants to.

    People come into the bar and Sam has seen them all before - people he has helped throughout the show, but they all have different names. And then he helps someone save some trapped miners. That guy then disappears in a flash of blue light just like Sam always would. And Sam realises that other Quatum Leapers do exist.

    Try and see it if you can find it - a very poignant end to a great series. And...spoiler...

















    ...He never does make it home.
  • eedioteediot Join Date: 2003-02-24 Member: 13903Members
    i fail to see the significance of this 'quantam leap'...?

    maybe i didnt read hard enough... i am quite busy =/
Sign In or Register to comment.