Ev0luti0n

hellokittyhellokitty riotkitty Join Date: 2003-04-09 Member: 15348Members
being that there is proof humans have undergone millions of years of evolution to get to the shape and form we have today...

what do you guess human's next evolutionary step will be?

i believe humans will lose their hair...we don't need it. i think we once did for insulation, but over time humans developed more efficient ways of keeping themselves warm.
we should lose our wisdom teeth and our appendix too because they're useless.
maybe our brains will be more bigger and our skull shape will look more narrow on the bottom and have a bigger crainial cavity.

ew...we'll really look like aliens. i'm guessing this'll happen millions of years from now when we're long gone and somewhat forgotten.

Comments

  • BurrBurr Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9358Members
    I asked this earlier (last week), and my answer was...
    <img src='http://www.natural-selection.org/images/post-1-54486-pudgy_8x6.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image'>

    Anyway, more emphasis on the mind, less on the body. We might even turn into beigins of pure thought.
  • littlewildlittlewild Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9467Members
    Sorry, but the proof being...?

    Yet to see anything concrete from the fossil record, besides completely developed specimens.
  • hellokittyhellokitty riotkitty Join Date: 2003-04-09 Member: 15348Members
    whoops sorry, i didn't know this thread has already been posted.

    i'd love to be a gorge! heh, we'd be like cows, except we'd be able to build stuff.
  • hellokittyhellokitty riotkitty Join Date: 2003-04-09 Member: 15348Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--littlewild+Apr 21 2003, 12:35 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (littlewild @ Apr 21 2003, 12:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Sorry, but the proof being...?

    Yet to see anything concrete from the fossil record, besides completely developed specimens. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    then those upright primate fossils are just extinct mammals?
  • BurrBurr Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9358Members
    must be, not to mention the one chromosome that we differ from the apes....
  • hellokittyhellokitty riotkitty Join Date: 2003-04-09 Member: 15348Members
    one chromosome makes us that much different from quite a few apes...but doesn't that mean we're closely related and that our ancestors were indeed hunting and gathering apes?
  • BurrBurr Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9358Members
    edited April 2003
    it means, that apes and humans had a common ancestor, but somewhere along the lines split along different paths of evolution, so in fact we didnt evolve from apes, just from a common ancestor.

    *sarcasm* Yeah, also all those cave paintings and prehistoric dwellings, they don't exsist, and dinosaurs are figmaents of our imagination too.

    *this reminds me, I have an anthropology midterm tommorow, on this subject!!*
  • Siberian_DingoSiberian_Dingo Join Date: 2003-01-15 Member: 12326Members
    evolution dos enot nessasarly mean that a person will grow a third arm or some thing. according to natural selection, the people who make the most babies, will pass there traits to the next generation.
  • James_H4xwellJames_H4xwell Join Date: 2002-12-25 Member: 11518Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Burr+Apr 21 2003, 12:39 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Burr @ Apr 21 2003, 12:39 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> must be, not to mention the one chromosome that we differ from the apes.... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I learned that from watching cowboy bebop hehehe. I seriously think we wont evolve at all. Theres simply no need too, everything will just stay the same.
  • BurrBurr Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9358Members
    yep, about 90-95% related on the genetic level to chimpanzees.
  • BurrBurr Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9358Members
    edited April 2003
    bah, double postage
  • p4Samwisep4Samwise Join Date: 2002-12-15 Member: 10831Members
    The way evolution is currently going, we'll get <b>dumber</b>, not smarter. For modern humans in fully developed countries, natural selection favors those who aren't smart enough to figure out how to use birth control effectively.

    There are exceptions, of course (my boss is a very bright self-made millionaire with about a gajillion kids), but on the whole, there simply isn't any reproductive advantage to being smarter, other than perhaps a slight survival edge (eg not driving drunk or sticking forks into electrical outlets).

    As an aside: theory on why we have hair on our heads is not to keep us cool, but to deflect the sun's rays and prevent sunstroke.
  • AllUrHiveRblong2usAllUrHiveRblong2us By Your Powers Combined... Join Date: 2002-12-20 Member: 11244Members
    The way things are going I'd say that NATURAL evolution would probably be leaning towards the rather destructive end, eventually filling our gene pool with so many defects that eventually no one will be left without some sort of genetic deseaze (spalling bad). Of course, technology will eventually progress to the point where these can be cured, and eventually I believe we will be the driving force of our own evolution, until the sun explodes.
  • SirusSirus Join Date: 2002-11-13 Member: 8466Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    Eh.

    These evolution posts always turn out oddly.

    First, Evolution is a THEORY, not a fact. Contrary to what you're told. So, those who believe that it is contradictory to some religions and therefore believe they are false, then you need to realize that evolution is basically a religion in itself.

    For as many scientist that will say its true, you'll have just as many say it's not.

    Just to clarify. : )

    Carry on.
  • BurrBurr Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9358Members
    yeah, it is officially called "The theory of evolution", theory being that it does not have enough evidence to be proven. But do you eve hear about "the theory of God"?
  • SirusSirus Join Date: 2002-11-13 Member: 8466Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    Sure, ask any die hard evolutionist, and they will call religion a giant theory. Or giant lie/hoax.
  • tbZBeAsttbZBeAst Join Date: 2003-01-26 Member: 12755Members
    The one that makes me laugh is humas always turn into these glittering intellectual beings of pure energy.

    Personally I believe that as lifestyle support gets bigger (cars, public transport, calculators, internet ordering) the average human will turn into a corpulent lazy slob incabable of all but the most basic functions, doomed to extinction as the support network fails and no-one can be bothered to fix it.
  • p4Samwisep4Samwise Join Date: 2002-12-15 Member: 10831Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Sirus+Apr 21 2003, 08:42 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Sirus @ Apr 21 2003, 08:42 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> For as many scientist that will say its true, you'll have just as many say it's not.
    <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Bet you a hundred bucks those figures ain't right. <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo-->

    To those who doubt the feasibility of evolution, I say to thee... BEHOLD MY SCREENSAVER!

    <a href='http://www.leadtogold.com/software/genesaver/index.html' target='_blank'>clicky</a>

    But yes, evolution is just a theory (though as theories go, it's about as close to being proven as it can get and still remain a "theory"), yada yada. I think we're meant to conduct discussion in this thread under the prior assumption that evolution does in fact happen, and that it's most likely still happening to us.
  • Chips1Chips1 Join Date: 2003-01-12 Member: 12197Members
    edited April 2003
    And remember that, scientifically, creationism/intelligent design (same thing) is a hypothesis:

    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->hy·poth·e·sis    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (h-pth-ss)
    n. pl. hy·poth·e·ses (-sz)
    A tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation.
    Something taken to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation; an assumption.
    The antecedent of a conditional statement. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Although one might say that creationism can't be tested by further scientific investigation as it is an act of faith (as are some of the very basic levels of science)

    Whereas evolution is a theory (as stated by the above post)
  • hellokittyhellokitty riotkitty Join Date: 2003-04-09 Member: 15348Members
    so even as advanced technology is now, we still don't know how life began on earth? i could've sworn i watched a bunch of science programs showing how life started out...

    oh hell what do i know, i appologize for making it sound like evolution is in fact true. i do believe in darwinism because it's true, every creature wants to survive. that is clearly evident in nature.
  • p4Samwisep4Samwise Join Date: 2002-12-15 Member: 10831Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--hellokitty+Apr 22 2003, 07:47 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (hellokitty @ Apr 22 2003, 07:47 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> so even as advanced technology is now, we still don't know how life began on earth? i could've sworn i watched a bunch of science programs showing how life started out... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Evolution is still a "theory" because it's not directly observable or reproducible in a laboratory, at least on a large scale. However, there's certainly a large enough body of supporting evidence (observation of evolution on smaller scales, fossil records, logical reasoning following from knowledge of genetics) that most scientists subscribe to the theory of evolution as the most likely explanation for how complex life arose on Earth.

    As far as I know, creationism is more of a "postulate" - it has to be accepted on faith, rather than supported or proven by external evidence.

    Note that the theory of evolution does not presuppose that God does not exist, or that God had no hand in creating life on Earth. It simply states that living things change over time to adapt to their environment, and that all living things that we see today are the product of many years of gradual refinement. (Creationism, AFAIK, states that all living things exist exactly as they were originally created by God, and that they don't ever change. I think it also states that the earth is something like 15 thousand years old, and that the fossil record is actually a product of "hydrodynamic sorting" at the time of the great flood.)
Sign In or Register to comment.