Can I run it?

CreaturemagicCreaturemagic Join Date: 2012-02-03 Member: 143481Members
So, been wanting the game for awhile and I just got some new parts for my PC. So now I think I can play it. However there have been some very discouraging posts concerning performance.
So could a PC with this run it?
AMD Quad Core 3.6Ghz CPU
NVIDIA 550ti 1GB
4GB Ram

Thanks for the help!

Comments

  • {GGs} Chicken{GGs} Chicken Join Date: 2011-11-22 Member: 134663Members, NS2 Map Tester
    Can you run it? Sure. Terribly? Yeah.
  • NordicNordic Long term camping in Kodiak Join Date: 2012-05-13 Member: 151995Members, NS2 Playtester, NS2 Map Tester, Reinforced - Supporter, Reinforced - Silver, Reinforced - Shadow
    The limitation is your cpu. Your practically need 4.5ghz to get always good fps.
  • CobraCommanderCobraCommander Join Date: 2012-07-30 Member: 154472Members
    Your CPU is slightly better than mine, so you'll run it terribly as they said. Just keep looking through servers until you find a decent one. I kept going to different ones until I got to one that plays with little lag. Terrible setting though. I'm having more fun now :) I love Aliens more in NS2 than in NS1 :)
  • CreaturemagicCreaturemagic Join Date: 2012-02-03 Member: 143481Members
    Okay, thanks for the replies, you say terribly? Does that apply if I'm running on lowest settings and lowest Resolution (Something like 800x600)?
  • CobraCommanderCobraCommander Join Date: 2012-07-30 Member: 154472Members
    Running the game on the lowest settings and lowest resolution will give the game a terrible look, not enough to make it unplayable, it still looks decent, it's not like in NS2HD is what I'm saying, but it should be enough to make the game playable. Come back here and let us know how it's going if you get the game ;)
  • CreaturemagicCreaturemagic Join Date: 2012-02-03 Member: 143481Members
    Seems like I'll purchase it :) Second question though! How big is the download? I have 500gb of net, I just like knowing how long it will take (which depends on size)
  • Raza.Raza. Join Date: 2004-01-24 Member: 25663Members, Constellation
    <!--quoteo(post=1955853:date=Aug 2 2012, 11:00 AM:name=CobraCommander)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (CobraCommander @ Aug 2 2012, 11:00 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1955853"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Running the game on the lowest settings and lowest resolution will give the game a terrible look, not enough to make it unplayable, it still looks decent, it's not like in NS2HD is what I'm saying, but it should be enough to make the game playable.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    That is actually not the case. My hardware is very similar and lowering the resolution has practically no effect on performance. Not even when going as low as 640x480. The only thing that matters is the CPU clock speed.
  • GORGEousGORGEous Join Date: 2012-02-19 Member: 146762Members, NS2 Map Tester
    <!--quoteo(post=1955856:date=Aug 2 2012, 05:15 AM:name=Creaturemagic)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Creaturemagic @ Aug 2 2012, 05:15 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1955856"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Seems like I'll purchase it :) Second question though! How big is the download? I have 500gb of net, I just like knowing how long it will take (which depends on size)<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    My local diskusage is 4.8 gigs according to steam.

    As for performance, make sure you find as low ping servers as you can. If you're an NA player then play on the good servers:
    all in
    steel confessors
    the 156 servers
    the transcend servers (t^)
    420 servers
    Anything that lists "NS2Servers.com" or "Inversion" in the title (these include almost all the servers I listed above)
    Lerk More (if it's still up)

    If you're a euro then you'll have to try out some servers to find some that are good. I know HBZ and Old Ass Gamers play decently, but I'm NA so I don't know much more than that.

    It's very important to play on a very good servers. Higher ping seems to kill your FPS. Lower performing servers seem to kill your FPS. Lagging servers completely kill gameplay and cause a lot of rubberbanding. If you play on bad servers then you'll have terrible play with any computer.

    Also, obviously, experiment with graphics settings. I don't see any real gain in FPS by lowering resolution or lowering general detail from high -> medium. The main FPS gain I get is by turning off all of the glowy ######. Turn off bloom, AA, atmospheric lights, shadows, shadow fading, anisotropic filtering. I have an i72600k OC'd to 4.5 and a geforce 570. I usually sit at 50-80 fps lately with some maps and late game going down to 30-50 fps.
  • cake.cake. Join Date: 2012-01-12 Member: 140165Members
    You'll run it just fine. NS2 is a great game that is very enjoyable even at low performance.
  • botchiballbotchiball Join Date: 2003-04-24 Member: 15810Members, Constellation
    <!--quoteo(post=1955831:date=Aug 2 2012, 04:11 AM:name=james888)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (james888 @ Aug 2 2012, 04:11 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1955831"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->The limitation is your cpu. Your practically need 4.5ghz to get always good fps.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I've got an Intel i7 cpu 950 @ 3.07 ghz, and I can run the game just fine at max settings.
  • _Necro__Necro_ Join Date: 2011-02-15 Member: 81895Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    <!--quoteo(post=1955875:date=Aug 2 2012, 01:05 PM:name=GORGEous)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GORGEous @ Aug 2 2012, 01:05 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1955875"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->My local diskusage is 4.8 gigs according to steam.

    As for performance, make sure you find as low ping servers as you can. If you're an NA player then play on the good servers:
    all in
    steel confessors
    the 156 servers
    the transcend servers (t^)
    420 servers
    Anything that lists "NS2Servers.com" or "Inversion" in the title (these include almost all the servers I listed above)
    Lerk More (if it's still up)

    If you're a euro then you'll have to try out some servers to find some that are good. I know HBZ and Old Ass Gamers play decently, but I'm NA so I don't know much more than that.

    It's very important to play on a very good servers. Higher ping seems to kill your FPS. Lower performing servers seem to kill your FPS. Lagging servers completely kill gameplay and cause a lot of rubberbanding. If you play on bad servers then you'll have terrible play with any computer.

    Also, obviously, experiment with graphics settings. I don't see any real gain in FPS by lowering resolution or lowering general detail from high -> medium. The main FPS gain I get is by turning off all of the glowy ######. Turn off bloom, AA, atmospheric lights, shadows, shadow fading, anisotropic filtering. I have an i72600k OC'd to 4.5 and a geforce 570. I usually sit at 50-80 fps lately with some maps and late game going down to 30-50 fps.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Very good post. In addition to the last point: When you try to find the right settings for your pc, your can use the console and "r_stats" to show fps and other useful info.
    When trying to find a good server you can use "net_stats" this will show you the server tick rate (=game calculation cycles per second). The tick rate will go down in the end game (with many buildings) on every server right now. You will feel this like lag, but it is not your machines fault. Good servers should hold 30 ticks most of the game.

    To the graphic settings. I have an old GForce 8800GTS (but an i5 with 2.7Ghz) I can play with 1280x720 Medium detail and everything besides bloom off with round about 40 fps.
  • GyverGyver Join Date: 2011-06-19 Member: 105379Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1955856:date=Aug 2 2012, 11:15 AM:name=Creaturemagic)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Creaturemagic @ Aug 2 2012, 11:15 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1955856"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Seems like I'll purchase it :)<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    You are not easily frightened off, it seems. ^^
  • SopsSops Join Date: 2003-07-03 Member: 17894Members, Constellation
    I have a AMD Quad Core @ 3.5Ghz and NS2 is perfectly playable.
  • deathmongerdeathmonger Join Date: 2012-07-06 Member: 153953Members
    What's the definition of playable? I get pissy if I see less than 60 FPS. If I at any point see 40 FPS or less I deem the game unplayable. Posting framerates with your setup would be more helpful than just stating "yea it's perfectly fine" if you ask me.
  • NakorNakor Join Date: 2011-11-02 Member: 130734Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1956080:date=Aug 2 2012, 03:38 PM:name=deathmonger87)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (deathmonger87 @ Aug 2 2012, 03:38 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1956080"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->What's the definition of playable? I get pissy if I see less than 60 FPS. If I at any point see 40 FPS or less I deem the game unplayable. Posting framerates with your setup would be more helpful than just stating "yea it's perfectly fine" if you ask me.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Well, i hope you have a some money to spare if you want that kind of FPS.

    I have a i2500k OC at 4.7 GHz(Cooling unit is a corsair h100)
    8 gigs at 1600 mhz speed 9-9-9-24( they should be at 2000mhz)
    580 gtx 1.5 gig
    SSD 128 gig.
    Board is a p8z68-V pro

    I'm playing at 1920x1200 with bloom/atmospherique off( cause they are ugly)and i do sometime go under 50 fps but rarely.

    On a side note. I OCed my CPU just recently. I was running stuck clockspeed last time i played. I did saw a huge boost in perf while playing NS 2. If i'm not work i want from 3700 to 4700 in turbo mode. That 1 GHz increase made it for me fps wise. I still ahve to deal with server issue like everybody.
  • WheeeeWheeee Join Date: 2003-02-18 Member: 13713Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    you should be able to play it at 30-50 fps. you need a really good comp (i5/i7 @4.5+) to get 60+ fps in this game, at this time.
  • CobraCommanderCobraCommander Join Date: 2012-07-30 Member: 154472Members
    His PC is slightly better than mine and I can play it at 100% with no lag in ns_summit, but the other maps give me minor unwanted lag.
  • blujayblujay Join Date: 2012-07-21 Member: 154277Members
    edited August 2012
    <!--quoteo(post=1955851:date=Aug 2 2012, 12:57 AM:name=Creaturemagic)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Creaturemagic @ Aug 2 2012, 12:57 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1955851"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Okay, thanks for the replies, you say terribly? Does that apply if I'm running on lowest settings and lowest Resolution (Something like 800x600)?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    They're misleading you. Expect occasional poor performance, but with that setup it'll be beyond comfortably playable. Those posters (must) have software issues with their computers.

    ~30-60 fps most of the time, 3.0 C2D / 460 1Gb model / 4Gb 800Mhz

    There was a marked improvement between build 214-15. Noticeable without measurement.

    <!--quoteo(post=1956080:date=Aug 2 2012, 11:38 AM:name=deathmonger87)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (deathmonger87 @ Aug 2 2012, 11:38 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1956080"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->What's the definition of playable? I get pissy if I see less than 60 FPS. If I at any point see 40 FPS or less I deem the game unplayable. Posting framerates with your setup would be more helpful than just stating "yea it's perfectly fine" if you ask me.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Using the search function would turn up results, rather than whining and floundering pointlessly. There isn't some wondrous Herald O' The Board just sitting around in every obscure internet forum waiting to serve you.
  • 1dominator11dominator1 Join Date: 2010-11-19 Member: 75011Members
    edited August 2012
    <!--quoteo(post=1955876:date=Aug 2 2012, 07:06 AM:name=cake.)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cake. @ Aug 2 2012, 07:06 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1955876"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->You'll run it just fine. NS2 is a great game that is very enjoyable even at low performance.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    If you like death (your death).

    <!--quoteo(post=1956175:date=Aug 2 2012, 07:13 PM:name=blujay)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (blujay @ Aug 2 2012, 07:13 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1956175"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Using the search function would turn up results, rather than whining and floundering pointlessly. There isn't some wondrous Herald O' The Board just sitting around in every obscure internet forum waiting to serve you.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    This forums default search is a sin against all search functions and the adv search is harder to find than a shade in central drilling.
  • ScardyBobScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow
    What people consider playable performance can vary drastically. Some will call anything under 60 fps terrible, while others are happy with an fps >10. There can also be issues other than fps that some people think are acceptable/unacceptable such as hitching/freezing, rubberbanding, or other lag-related problems.

    Personally, I think you will be fine with that setup, especially if you disable much of the graphical options (texture to low, turn off atmospherics/bloom/shadows/etc). Though, you can check out (and even post) your performance in the <a href="http://www.unknownworlds.com/ns2/forums/index.php?showtopic=119506" target="_blank">benchmark thread</a>.
  • SecuritySecurity Join Date: 2005-01-07 Member: 33133Members, Constellation, Squad Five Blue
    edited August 2012
    I'd recommend the OP to read the benchmark thread: <a href="http://www.unknownworlds.com/ns2/forums/index.php?showtopic=119506&st=0" target="_blank">http://www.unknownworlds.com/ns2/forums/in...119506&st=0</a>

    Have a look at the average FPS that people get with different system builds (pay attention to the CPU clock rates) and imagine what performance you might get, with a 3.6 GHZ AMD Quadcore.

    It should also be noted that Intel CPUs perform a lot better than AMD ones, at the same or even lower clock speeds.

    Unless you are very insensitive to lag and low fps, you might be disappointed.

    Just saying, to provide an opinion a little more questioning than "IT WILL RUN JUST FINE!!!11".
  • AtoneAtone Join Date: 2009-09-21 Member: 68839Members
    I have a very similar set up to OP, with a slightly worse CPU. The game has been playable for me for a while now. I sit at about 30 FPS. Could be better, but it's certainly not a slideshow.
Sign In or Register to comment.