Reduce Rifle Rate of Fire

Yak9UTYak9UT Join Date: 2010-06-18 Member: 72086Members
in Ideas and Suggestions
I've being getting very frustrated with the Marines Rifle rate of fire.

Its simply too fast that players uses up all thier ammo in a few secounds and have to reload alot in the heat of battle.

I propose the rifles rate of fire being reduced and maybe a increase of in damage to compensate.

Please leave a response on whether or not its a good idea.

-Yak9UT
Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome

Comments

  • AlignAlign Remain Calm Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 5216Forum Moderators, Constellation
    ...Don't hold down the mouse button so much? Learning when to fire and when not to is all part of getting better at video games.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • botchiballbotchiball Join Date: 2003-04-24 Member: 15810Members, Constellation
    <!--quoteo(post=1937264:date=May 19 2012, 07:48 AM:name=Align)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Align @ May 19 2012, 07:48 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1937264"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->...Don't hold down the mouse button so much? Learning when to fire and when not to is all part of getting better at video games.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    +1 - but don't take it the wrong way, its something I struggle with too. But then, I prefer the gnashy teeth.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Champlo0Champlo0 Join Date: 2012-04-17 Member: 150617Members
    I just prefer shotguns. No having to retardedly track skulks, just one flickshot. That being said maybe you could put a burst mode onto it or something and switch flashlight to an individual thing. Still is your own fault for holding the button down, though.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • internetexplorerinternetexplorer Join Date: 2011-10-13 Member: 127255Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1937261:date=May 19 2012, 07:24 AM:name=Yak9UT)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Yak9UT @ May 19 2012, 07:24 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1937261"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Please leave a response on whether or not its a good idea.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    it's a bad idea because players get more for less - they have to hit less shots to do the same damage, so the people who can perform well enough to actually aim (which eventually will be everyone) are better than they used to be, and you just threw in a new level of imbalance to sort out

    now come at me and say I'm trolling. let's get this to 5 pages!
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • RanemanRaneman Join Date: 2010-01-07 Member: 69962Members
    edited May 2012
    EDIT: Sorry, read it wrong.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
Sign In or Register to comment.