SewlekThe programmer previously known as SchimmelJoin Date: 2003-05-13Member: 16247Members, NS2 Developer, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Gold, Subnautica Developer
<!--quoteo(post=1856985:date=Jun 28 2011, 04:23 PM:name=DJPenguin)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (DJPenguin @ Jun 28 2011, 04:23 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1856985"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->good lord. the interviewer had the enthusiasm of someone in a state of comatosis .<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo(post=1856991:date=Jun 28 2011, 10:20 PM:name=Silverwing)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Silverwing @ Jun 28 2011, 10:20 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1856991"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Charlie was alert and enthusiastic as ever. I swear, the company does not run on money, it runs on enthusiasm!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> YUP!!!! WE'RE AN ENTHUSIASTIC BUNCH HERE!!!!!!!!!!!
I love you guys, Seriously, I know you don't run on enthusiasm and sunshine (although you seem to have lots of both!), which is why I donated to Constellation and preordered.
You make mistakes, you make decisions I don't agree with but ultimately, I didn't "invest" in MY company. I "invested" in YOURS, because I believe you will make a great product, wether I agree with the details or not. And I do, so far =)
Relentless! Hehehe, I prefer Red Bull myself! Good word though. ;)
Good interview, bad editing.
<b>To design3</b> Please do a standing interview next time, or at least have both interviewer and interviewee lean forwards in their chairs. Both of them seem so nervous body language-wise. Or, just keep it focused on headshots (these worked well in this video, better if you crop the headshots closer) with some liberal editing to catch the least awkward-looking wide shots. And edit out the bits where the interviewee asks to be reminded of the question if there are long pauses. And don't do dissolves from the same scene to the same scene if you don't want to convey a passage of time (you don't: we don't need or want to know that the interview had re-takes and bits cut out that we may feel we're missing out on). Also never, NEVER keep the shots of the interviewer or interviewee shuffling about and looking down, those are supposed to stay off camera. /headasplode
<!--quoteo(post=1857191:date=Jun 29 2011, 05:38 PM:name=Crispy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Crispy @ Jun 29 2011, 05:38 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1857191"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->And don't do dissolves from the same scene to the same scene if you don't want to convey a passage of time (you don't: we don't need or want to know that the interview had re-takes and bits cut out that we may feel we're missing out on).<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Just fyi, from the video's description box:
"(Note: This is a shortened version of the interview. The complete interview will be added soon to design3's upcoming "Career Corner". Check back for the link to be added here)"
<!--quoteo(post=1857202:date=Jun 29 2011, 10:20 PM:name=Corporal_Fortier)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Corporal_Fortier @ Jun 29 2011, 10:20 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1857202"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Just fyi, from the video's description box:
"(Note: This is a shortened version of the interview. The complete interview will be added soon to design3's upcoming "Career Corner". Check back for the link to be added here)"
That might be why some parts arue cut.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->My point is that the editing and framing is terrible and the dissolve in particular w as completely misused.
Comments
Also NES ruled!
at least he was awake? :D
YUP!!!! WE'RE AN ENTHUSIASTIC BUNCH HERE!!!!!!!!!!!
WOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
I love you guys, Seriously, I know you don't run on enthusiasm and sunshine (although you seem to have lots of both!), which is why I donated to Constellation and preordered.
You make mistakes, you make decisions I don't agree with but ultimately, I didn't "invest" in MY company. I "invested" in YOURS, because I believe you will make a great product, wether I agree with the details or not. And I do, so far =)
oh man, I always wanted to do that.
Good interview, bad editing.
<b>To design3</b>
Please do a standing interview next time, or at least have both interviewer and interviewee lean forwards in their chairs. Both of them seem so nervous body language-wise. Or, just keep it focused on headshots (these worked well in this video, better if you crop the headshots closer) with some liberal editing to catch the least awkward-looking wide shots. And edit out the bits where the interviewee asks to be reminded of the question if there are long pauses. And don't do dissolves from the same scene to the same scene if you don't want to convey a passage of time (you don't: we don't need or want to know that the interview had re-takes and bits cut out that we may feel we're missing out on). Also never, NEVER keep the shots of the interviewer or interviewee shuffling about and looking down, those are supposed to stay off camera. /headasplode
Just fyi, from the video's description box:
"(Note: This is a shortened version of the interview. The complete interview will be added soon to design3's upcoming "Career Corner". Check back for the link to be added here)"
That might be why some parts are cut.
"(Note: This is a shortened version of the interview. The complete interview will be added soon to design3's upcoming "Career Corner". Check back for the link to be added here)"
That might be why some parts arue cut.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->My point is that the editing and framing is terrible and the dissolve in particular w
as completely misused.