<!--quoteo(post=1894391:date=Jan 14 2012, 12:37 PM:name=derWalter)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (derWalter @ Jan 14 2012, 12:37 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1894391"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->small side-question: why bzip2>7zip, etc.?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> I initially went for bzip2 because that's what Source uses for map-compression (an unconscious desire for compliancy I guess). As for how it stacks up against 7zip, that seems to be a bit of a hit-and-miss, some sources indicate it is faster in compressing, slower in decompression with a slightly worse ratio, or faster in compression, a lot slower in decompression with a slightly better ratio. All in all I'm quite happy with the results I'm getting, if it's warranted I can always switch to another algorithm at any point.
<!--quoteo(post=0:date=:name=rammaj)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rammaj)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Allso wanted to ask weather we will eventully ( future improved versions ) be able to rewind fast forward and such, like how it is in SC2?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Sure, but not initially, I want to get a stable version with the bare essentials out first.
Comments
I initially went for bzip2 because that's what Source uses for map-compression (an unconscious desire for compliancy I guess). As for how it stacks up against 7zip, that seems to be a bit of a hit-and-miss, some sources indicate it is faster in compressing, slower in decompression with a slightly worse ratio, or faster in compression, a lot slower in decompression with a slightly better ratio. All in all I'm quite happy with the results I'm getting, if it's warranted I can always switch to another algorithm at any point.
<!--quoteo(post=0:date=:name=rammaj)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rammaj)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Allso wanted to ask weather we will eventully ( future improved versions ) be able to rewind fast forward and such, like how it is in SC2?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Sure, but not initially, I want to get a stable version with the bare essentials out first.
...