Client Side Scripting

Superfly

<!--quoteo(post=1709856:date=Jun 3 2009, 10:19 AM:name=noncomposmentis)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noncomposmentis @ Jun 3 2009, 10:19 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1709856"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->While I'd like to see an interesting debate on this subject, this thread went from zero to "Full of NS Baggage" in 2 posts. Seriously, guys, clanners v pubbers still? The NS forums was infested with the strange division between the two, some "Lord of the Flies"-like idea that there are only two dichotomous ways of playing the game.

It would be <b>way</b> more useful if everyone would cease using NS as a frame of reference, and instead focus on more modern games with client-side modding. I mean, bunnyhopping was a bug from a 15 year old engine (which, yes, was very fun to exploit). It's kind of hard to imagine physics exploits in modern games, isn't it?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->


Speaking of modern games with client-side modding.. I will sell you my Left4Dead dual pistol script real cheap...

solcott

<!--quoteo(post=1709536:date=Jun 2 2009, 10:27 AM:name=Thansal)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thansal @ Jun 2 2009, 10:27 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1709536"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->...
Games should reward you for actual valuable skills! Like being able to balance your checkbook, or bake a cake, or accurately file your tax returns!
...<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh please, a reward for baking a cake? Everybody knows that as long as you do your cooking by the book, it's a piece of cake to bake a pretty cake!
<img src="http://content.ytmnd.com/content/0/4/e/04e2b1347858564536431e8dd428d305.gif" border="0" class="linked-image" />


ONTOPIC: I agree with the whole "no gameplay elements" thing in script. I would have problems that are for movement/attacking/anything in NS1 that needed the wait command/etc., but stuff like chat binds like "I have X ammo left in X weapon", or "I currently have X health and I am at X location" are fine with me :-)

CHAMois

_special owned qtiyd

Thansal

<!--quoteo(post=1709889:date=Jun 3 2009, 12:20 PM:name=solcott)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (solcott @ Jun 3 2009, 12:20 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1709889"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->ONTOPIC: I agree with the whole "no gameplay elements" thing in script. I would have problems that are for movement/attacking/anything in NS1 that needed the wait command/etc., but stuff like chat binds like "I have X ammo left in X weapon", or "I currently have X health and I am at X location" are fine with me :-)<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Those need to be banned.

Horribly

In fact, any one that tries to use them needs to have horrible things happen to them.

locallyunscene

I'm thinking not having scripting as a form of damage control. As in the above example, it's the difference between one or two players being able to cause it, and it breaking the game(if it becomes mainstream).