Why these forums may be a hotbed of criminal activity...
Is the use of Linux probable cause? <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/boston-college-prompt-commands-are-suspicious" target="_blank">Apparently so</a>. This type of thing seems to be happening a lot recently, and together with Richard Stallman's comment on the supranational legislation to allow search and seizure of your laptop, copy/move/delete files on it all without a warrant, is it reasonable to say this may be part of a larger movement away from personal freedom on your computer and on the internet?
Am I overreacting or should we, whose expertise may be used as evidence against us, be concerned?
Am I overreacting or should we, whose expertise may be used as evidence against us, be concerned?
Comments
Oh how nice, it's censored!
I like that they took his Ubuntu CD. "We got his hacker tools, sir"
WHO'S LAUGHING NOW?!
<!--quoteo(post=1705018:date=Apr 16 2009, 03:04 AM:name=Zaggy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Zaggy @ Apr 16 2009, 03:04 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1705018"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->What is this freedom you speak of?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That would be privacy rights, property rights, and of course, habeus computicus.
As a victim of ignorant law enforcement in regards to technology and psychology, I'm not surprised. The only shocking thing about this to me is that this happened in Massachusetts and not Alabama or Alaska or something.
Yea, cops took my gaming desktop, my laptop (incidentally running Linux), my Palm, and my DS... (I did however get the DS back.)
This further removes any faith I had in law enforcement in the US.
/me goes off to h4x pokemons with tcpdump.
:edit:
Oh, and habeas corpus is dead.
*Warning, looking at the TSA will automatically add you to the do not fly list*
Nope, but I can sympathize with him.
The concern isn't that he committed libel (crime) by sending out email to a list of people that outed the informant by linking him to a ###### personal ad that he probably created (fraud). The problem is that he a suspect in several other crimes including a stolen laptop as detailed in the motion to quash:
<a href="http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/inresearchBC/CalixteMemSupport.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/inresear...eMemSupport.pdf</a> [eff.org]
While there is probably quite a bit for the defense to attack in how this warrant was obtained, my biggest concern is how it was handled. I suspect the following description is more common than we would like to know:
"... seized, among other things, Mr. Calixte's cell phone, his iPod, computers, disks, and "postit" note on which Calixte was in the process of taking notes about the officers' actions during the search. Christopher left a Property Receipt with Mr. Calixte listing items seized during the search. (Kessel Decl. Ex. C.) The seized post-it note does not appear on that receipt."
That's the type of bullying that makes me sick.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Also the full warrant if you haven't all ready(I know it's in the article):
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->SCPRedMage
The story the EFF is putting forward is actually incomplete and VERY misleading. The guy is being accused of a LOT of things; changing students grades, "jail breaking cell phones" (since when is THAT a crime?), massive copyright infringement, and harassment, to which the e-mail in question is related.
Considering all of THAT, data storage devices are practically MANDATORY for the warrant. And considering that iPods can, and frequently ARE, used as USB hard drives, they're fair game.
Also, we ARE talking about an iPod Touch, as mentioned in the second link in the /. story.
Link to the full warrant affidavit: <a href="http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/inresearchBC/EXHIBIT-A.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/inresearchBC/EXHIBIT-A.pdf</a> [eff.org]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The news report only covered what they wanted to and with a sensationalist spin.
he very possibly is guilty of some bad things.
The cops were still stupid in handling stuff.
he very possibly is guilty of some bad things.
The cops were still stupid in handling stuff. "
This really should have been common sense from the beginning however.