Richard Stallman
locallyunscene
Feeder of Trolls Join Date: 2002-12-25 Member: 11528Members, Constellation
in Off-Topic
<div class="IPBDescription">you have 2 hours to post questions</div>So I'm going to see a talk by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman" target="_blank">Richard Stallman</a> today. I can't think of anything intelligent or worthwhile to ask him so I figured I'd see if anyone had any burning questions. I don't know if there's going to be a Q&A session, but it's supposed to be a small crowd to I'm guessing there will be.
Comments
I'd've asked if his beard really did grant him extra-ordinary Unix powers.
--Scythe--
He touched on this briefly, the talk was at a law school so it was actually more about copyright than free software. The way I see it is it actually works much better, just the business models are different. I'm going to assume you actually know what free(as in speech) software is and just provide some examples.
Awesome Free Software Programmer writes a great application and distributes the source code with it. Everyone starts using and it becomes a defacto standard and demand for people who know how to use/modify the application is high. Now Some Organization comes along and says "This software is great, but we also want it to do X". Awesome Free Software Programmer says "I wrote this software, and I can make it to X in 1/10th the time of anyone else."
The other more direct way would be the web service business model which is all ready a proven concept.
Awesome Free Software Programmer writes a great application and distributes the source code with it. Everyone starts using and it becomes a defacto standard and demand for people who know how to use/modify the application is high. Now Some Organization comes along and says "This software is great, but we also want it to do X". Awesome Free Software Programmer says "I wrote this software, and I can make it to X in 1/10th the time of anyone else."
The other more direct way would be the web service business model which is all ready a proven concept.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But the web service business model assumes that a majority of our services won't be done via the web or programs for quite a while- and as we're beginning to see, we may not be very far from having the only a few businesses not be entirely web-based. When Mint.com can do your taxes, why have a preparer? When the world has e-paper on nearly every device, why get paper? Or CDs/DVDs/Blu-Rays? Hell, the entire field of accounting could cease to exist. Economists suddenly are made useless by their own algorithms. Medicine even would become nothing more than a home test and showing up to get it fixed. Truly only the tangible products matter at that point- and that's where I see this breaking down. And the thing is, it seems closer and closer every time you look.
I wouldn't be too concerned about this particular one. In our lifetimes, maybe. But not anytime soon.
<a href="http://www.gametrailers.com/player/47079.html" target="_blank">OnLive</a> is exciting.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw&feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw...feature=related</a>
<a href="http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/gdc-why-onlive-cant-possibly-work-article" target="_blank">i r crshn ur dreemz</a>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw&feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sJUDx7iEJw...feature=related</a><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
So idealistic, pedantic, impenetrable, and uncongenial to the common user? Fair enough. Doesn't make him wrong though.