Vote for Time's Top 100 Most Influential Persons, now!
DrSuredeath
Join Date: 2002-11-11 Member: 8217Members
Ready. Set! Go!
Well, looking at the current ranking, it's hardly listed by the influence.
More like who got the most fanboys on the Interweb.
<img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tounge.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p" border="0" alt="tounge.gif" />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/time100walkup/article/0,28804,1611030_1612457,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/tim...1612457,00.html</a>
Well, looking at the current ranking, it's hardly listed by the influence.
More like who got the most fanboys on the Interweb.
<img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tounge.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p" border="0" alt="tounge.gif" />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/time100walkup/article/0,28804,1611030_1612457,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/tim...1612457,00.html</a>
Comments
as you say it's just a vote contest.
Colbert FTW anyway.
Rowling has, if nothing else, encouraged a very large part of an entire generation to take up reading again, which is arguably more significant for the future of humankind than a lot of the nonsense that gets touted around as 'influential' ( cf: bono ).
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
More like influenced a whole new generation to read Harry Potter. Then watch the movies and buy the LEGO sets and play the video games.