Overclocking Cpu's?

Daza4Daza4 Kerc Kasha Join Date: 2003-04-06 Member: 15233Members
<div class="IPBDescription">How to and what is needed?</div> Ok i want to pull a bit more preformance out of my rig by clocking my new cpu. It's a AMD Athlon 2400, Right now it's running at 2 ghtz, im trying to get it to be atleast 2.5? Is this possible and how do i do it? Cooling isn't a problem because i have 2 very good fans. My mobo is a Shuttle, Agp 4x 512 mb sd ram.

Comments

  • XiileXiile Join Date: 2003-02-22 Member: 13818Members
    Overclocking is done via the BIOS, how to get there depends on what kind of mobo you have.

    And a 500mhz overclock is quite extreme btw...
  • Daza4Daza4 Kerc Kasha Join Date: 2003-04-06 Member: 15233Members
    what would you recomend? I tried to over clock in bios but the function wasn't their. Do i need to flash my bios or something?
  • MulletMullet Join Date: 2003-04-28 Member: 15910Members, Constellation
    I overclocked this 800mhz amd athlon to 1.2ghz <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • uranium_235uranium_235 Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9478Banned
    edited December 2003
    If you're down to asking on forums about overclocking, you shouldn't be doing it. Also, an AMD 2400 is plenty, and it certainly doesn't need it. Furthermore, the AMD 2400 doesn't naturally run at even close to 2GHz so it sounds like it's already running at peak capacity. Finally, you'll need a lot more then just 2 lousy fans if you plan on overclocking it even MORE. Mine's not even overclocked and with 7 fans total, I still have a hard time keeping it running with any stability. (Though my GFx card I could boil water on doesn't help)

    I learned how to overclock on my own. I tried using some internet site and it was pretty much worthless because of the hugely varied number of mobos and processors out there.

    So because I like giving toddlers guns, and I need a cheap laugh, I'll tell you how <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo-->

    First of all, check if your mobo has breakers on it. If it doesn't have any (Them banks of tiny switches), then you'll need to do it over your BIOS. Which is a lot easier. If it DOES have breakers, find the one with a corresponding table of multiplier settings (x25, x26, etc) and slowly change it higher, and check the running speed each time you boot. Let it cook after changing more then 2 multiplier levels.

    If it's through your BIOS, it's a lot easier. My BIOS is so magical and happy, it was MADE for overclocking and has corresponding estimates of temperature gain and how many MHz you'll get out of the new setting. Simply adjust the number that says 'CPU multiplier'. You can also increase the voltage for a performance increase, but it's quite easy to blow all the crap to hell playing with THAT. You can overclock your GFx card, your RAM (Which you won't need to unless it's dying), hard drive, etc.
  • Daza4Daza4 Kerc Kasha Join Date: 2003-04-06 Member: 15233Members
    Whoa your fans must suck or something because my 2 fans keep the cpu very cool. But ive decicded not to overclock it because of it getting to hot and burning the chip.
  • uranium_235uranium_235 Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9478Banned
    edited December 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--Daza400+Dec 13 2003, 10:35 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Daza400 @ Dec 13 2003, 10:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Whoa your fans must suck or something because my 2 fans keep the cpu very cool. But ive decicded not to overclock it because of it getting to hot and burning the chip. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    They're 7000 RPM fans, and my computer sounds like a jet, trust me they do not suck <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo--> I took one out and the entire thing didn't work right until I put it back in. (Course, my processor is more powerful then yours is).


    BTW: It takes a lot to burn or crack the chip. People that show 'OMG OVERCLOCKING MAADNESSS' and a shattered AMD chip are either retards, rich people having a laugh, or retarded rich people, because if you're running it hot enough to burn the core... you're a retard.
  • TenSixTenSix Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7932Members
    Theres really no reason to overclock since the benefits are minimal compared to the long term damage you can cause to your CPU from running above spec. Even with the best fans your not going to be able to overclock a significant ammount, unless your using water cooling or some other extravagant method of cooling its not going to do much. Any method you use to seriously overclock while not frying the CPU is going to a) be expensive or b) so cold it will create condensation inside your case. Micro water droplets + electricity = dead system.

    With 2 fans you might be able to manage +300Mhz or so. Maybe more, maybe less. You could always buy another fan, but then you have a leafblower, and a dust magnet. And dust build up can be just as bad as condensation.
  • NecroticNecrotic Big Girl&#39;s Blouse Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 53Members, NS1 Playtester
    Most motherboards these days come ready for you to o/c your CPU, and I boosted my 2500+ Barton core to a 2800 (1.8gig to 2gig) just because I could and wanted to feel the power of 2gigabytes (not much differant from 1.8 which is why I clocked it back down) and that was with a pretty basic copper core CPU sink and fan and a single case fan.
  • ZelZel Join Date: 2003-01-27 Member: 12861Members
    its a long read, but theres a crapload of information to know, the first thing is that it is possible to break all yer stuff by overclocking, jsut as it is possible to break a mouse if you use it wrong, so read up, a lot.

    overclocking is the process of making your chip run faster than intended, and like an athlete he gets darn hot and could get a heatstroke if not properly cooled.

    youve got temperature, frontsidebus, multiplier and voltage.

    if temps get too much the chip dies. thats why we talk about dozens of fans, good thermal paste and great heatsinks (75$ USD = great heatsinks)

    the mhz is the fsb times the multiplier, and if the mhz gets too much for the chip it wont work, but that isnt irreversible damage, you can jsut turn it back down again. the fsb is how fast the board runs, so your memory has to be stable at that speed and your other components ahve to be acclimated to speed changes as well. the multiplier only effects the chip, sometimes you can crank it up a few knotches and gain speed without affecting the board, or you can turn it down if you want the board to go faster and the chip to stay the same speed.

    if the fsb gets too high then other parts of the motherboard get hot too, hence northbridge coolers and mofset sinks.

    and lastly voltage, if the mhz goes up, temps goes up and stability goes down, and as voltage rises temperature rises twofold and stability rise as well.

    for instance
    chip stock speed 99% reliability 50C, increased voltage by 0.1v, then stability will be 99.8% and temp will be around 60C.

    ---
    personally i use a liquid cooling system so temperature is not an issue, ive got my voltage maxed so that my chip can sustain high speeds while stable and cool, however, the chip is still limited by the motherboards capacity and its own core design, the memory inside my chip (l1 and l2 cache) was designed to run at 12 multiplier and 100 fsb, and it refuses to run at more than 8.5 multiplier and 166 fsb. no matter my temperature and the voltage is maxed in the bios it wont go faster.

    now persumably i could get it to go faster with more voltage, because my cooling system can handle the load without heating up the chip. but my motherboard only supports a small range of voltage choices without crazy modifications like soldering, so here i am stuck. ive put a LOT of research and work into getting my 1.2ghz to go 1.416ghz, and i could probably get a 2.5ghz to go 3.0ghz, once i can afford one.
  • uranium_235uranium_235 Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9478Banned
    edited December 2003
    I probably would have a liquid system because my box sounds like a Boeing taking off, but buying a liquid cooling system is like shopping for vital car parts online. You might find something close to what you're looking for but chances are it won't fit right, it won't work right, and you just wasted all your money.

    Example, thermaltake had a great sale on a water cooling set a month ago (Is it 'thermal-take' or 'thermal-taa-kee'?). I would've bought it but the system is designed to only fit in one type of case: Theirs.

    Finally they're expensive as hell for what amounts to nothing more then an extravagent aquarium pump. Man it costs so much money to manufacture a plastic tank and tubing...
  • ZelZel Join Date: 2003-01-27 Member: 12861Members
    those kits youre looking at are similar to buying a computer from HP, youre getting what the company wants you to get.

    real men do it themselves! silent aquarium pump of decent power 35$, a heatercore of appropriate dimensions, 25$, tubing that you know will fit perfectly cuz you were able to play with it at the hardware store personally? 35 cents/foot. mid-level waterblock 40$.

    all of your assumptions about liquid cooling are wrong uranium, these things just take an amazing amount of research and quite a bit of effort, but its not difficult or too expensive. when youre done youve got cooling surface area the size of five zalman flowers in that new heatercore. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->

    sure its possible to mess stuff up, but where in life doesnt that hold true!
  • DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Join Date: 2003-08-05 Member: 18951Members
    wow zel, if it's that easy to liquid cool cases, you should go into business =P

    surprising no company has solution that economical yet. if it's really the wave of the future, why aren't fans being phased out yet?
  • DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Join Date: 2003-08-05 Member: 18951Members
    edited December 2003
    I'm also an overclocking nub... if your CPU's speed is FSB times multiplier, why can you separately set your processor's speed? in my BIOS I have the option to set FSB and also to set speed, between 800 mhz and 2k ghz... speaking of which, why doesn't it let me set processor speed higher than 2k ghz? isn't that rather slow? it's the base speed of my athlon 64...

    what would you change first if you had an athlon 64, asus k8v mobo, fsb 200 and multiplier 10? Uranium suggested upping the multiplier, and I haven't looked at that option yet, but bumping it up 1 to 11, and going from 2000 mhz straight to 2200, would seem risky...

    my BIOS has a nice old-fashioned 'turbo' feature which ups my mhz from 2000 to 2063, which is decent I suppose... I did a benchmark before and after and there was actually an apparent DECREASE in performance though... no stability problems yet, and temp stays under 50 C...

    perhaps I should do as some suggest and just leave it alone. makes me jealous to run 3DMark03 and compare my results online and see people with the same hardware getting like a 20% better score...
  • ShockehShockeh If a packet drops on the web and nobody&#39;s near to see it... Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9336NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators, Constellation
    edited December 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->BTW: It takes a lot to burn or crack the chip. People that show 'OMG OVERCLOCKING MAADNESSS' and a shattered AMD chip are either retards, rich people having a laugh, or retarded rich people, because if you're running it hot enough to burn the core... you're a retard. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    <hangover>U-235's ongoing ability to not only flame but make lovely generalised statements continues to amaze me.

    It is <b>not</b> hard to trash your CPU, because all you need to do to do so is push your luck. Most CPU's do have a safe overhead of how far they can be overclocked, and you can still go a little further than that, it's like crush depth for submarines. But you've got absolutely NIL comeback if you end up with a molten puddle of silicon glue stuck to your mobo, wrecking both in the process.

    Just trying to give you fair warning before you go there.

    Oh....

    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->surprising no company has solution that economical yet. if it's really the wave of the future, why aren't fans being phased out yet?
    <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Legal implications. You get one faulty unit, you've forking out in compensation for new PC & 'loss of vital data' as the courts say.

    - Shockwave </hangover>
  • uranium_235uranium_235 Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9478Banned
    edited December 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--Shockwave+Dec 14 2003, 03:36 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Shockwave @ Dec 14 2003, 03:36 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->BTW: It takes a lot to burn or crack the chip. People that show 'OMG OVERCLOCKING MAADNESSS' and a shattered AMD chip are either retards, rich people having a laugh, or retarded rich people, because if you're running it hot enough to burn the core... you're a retard. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    <hangover>U-235's ongoing ability to not only flame but make lovely generalised statements continues to amaze me.

    It is <b>not</b> hard to trash your CPU, because all you need to do to do so is push your luck. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    And just like any OTHER form of gambling, you learn to quit while you're ahead, instead of being spending all your cash thinking you'll keep winning, so my point still stands. If you have brains it's hard to melt your chip. If you don't, it's easy. From your reply, I assume you're one who managed to do it.
  • ShockehShockeh If a packet drops on the web and nobody&#39;s near to see it... Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9336NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->U-235's ongoing ability to not only flame but make lovely generalised statements continues to amaze me.
    <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    I stand proved correct.

    Incidentally, no, I didn't.
  • BeastBeast Armonkyi Join Date: 2003-04-21 Member: 15731Members, Constellation
    edited December 2003
    Thanks Dazza for making this thread <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo--> Now I have something for myself to use for Overclocking my chip, but I have good reason.
    I have a AMD 2500 XP+, barton core. This lovely chip runs at around 30'c at MAX load with the standard cruddy heatsink that would go with it. People have overclocked it with the same heatsink to a 2800+ XP, and it has still run stable and fine.

    So I've got a lovely all copper thermaltake volcano and I am going to overclock to a 2800 slowly. If the temp is still ok at max load, I shall OC it to a 2900, 3000 and so on.

    The best part? The 3200 costs ?300, the 2500 ?60. I have heard they are the same chip, just one runs at a higher speed... soo um, whatever <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo--> I get the power of a ?200 chiop for ?60, I think I did something right there <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->

    ...all I have to worry about is getting fur in the fans or on the motherboard..... hehehhee
  • Soylent_greenSoylent_green Join Date: 2002-12-20 Member: 11220Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    power output is roughly proportional to the voltage squared while power output is roughly proportional to the clockspeed. Therefor it is much easier to cool a processor if you just overclock it as far as it will go without increasing the voltage(when you push it too much you will need to increase the voltage in order not to cause stabillity problems), when you need to up the voltage a whole lot just to keep it stable you need some serious cooling.

    The problem with p4's in terms of overclocking is that the CPU multiplier is locked(in the case of athlon64's I think it is only locked upwards, meaning you can go ahead and underclock it <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo-->).

    This is a problem because you will very quickly need to run the FSB and memory out of sync(EG running with FSB:MEM divider of 5:4 at 3 GHz if you wish your memory to run at 400 MHz as it normally would for a p4 C processor), this causes extra memory latency and can even hurt performance more than it helps in rare circumstances.
  • Soylent_greenSoylent_green Join Date: 2002-12-20 Member: 11220Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->If the temp is still ok at max load, I shall OC it to a 2900, 3000 and so on.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Don't just check temps, run memtest86 and something stressfull like prime95 for a few hours.
  • BeastBeast Armonkyi Join Date: 2003-04-21 Member: 15731Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--Soylent green+Dec 14 2003, 12:22 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Soylent green @ Dec 14 2003, 12:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->If the temp is still ok at max load, I shall OC it to a 2900, 3000 and so on.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Don't just check temps, run memtest86 and something stressfull like prime95 for a few hours. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Thanks for the advice ^^
  • SandrockSandrock Join Date: 2002-12-16 Member: 10905Members, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow
    For the original poster, I dont think any of us should be giving him advice on how he can overclock based on the information he's given us: AMD 2400+ and 2 fans.

    Until we get more information (mobo, heatsink, thermal paste, current load temps) we really shouldn't be telling him how much (much less how) he can overclock. Do some research, overclockers.com is a very good resource and their forums are even better.


    Beast, you have a good chip there and should have no problem putting it to a 3200+ or farther. I have the same chip and 560 grams of pure copper directly over the top of it, and I plan on putting it much faster than a 3200+.
  • ZelZel Join Date: 2003-01-27 Member: 12861Members
    www.overclockers.com
    www.amdforums.com

    both are a great resource.

    and DiscoZombie, as to why it has settings for mhz, those are presets with the multiplier and fsb, probably 10x133, 10x166 and 10x200, which is why you dont see it go past 2,000 mhz, but by changing settings manually it can do just about any combination.

    the new amd chips are "locked" that means you cant change the multiplier, because SO many people were buying amd 2500+ and making them go 3200+ that they were losing money <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Join Date: 2003-08-05 Member: 18951Members
    aha, thanks for the info soylent and zel... so since I can only change my FSB then, and up to 215 max I think it was, the fastest I could make my processor go would be 2150mhz? I don't really want to, I'm just curious. these 64 bit chips must be really something if they can do at 2 ghz what other athlon chips can do at like 2.5 and pentiums can do at 3.2...
  • OttoDestructOttoDestruct Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7790Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Zel+Dec 14 2003, 04:53 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Zel @ Dec 14 2003, 04:53 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> www.overclockers.com
    www.amdforums.com

    both are a great resource.

    and DiscoZombie, as to why it has settings for mhz, those are presets with the multiplier and fsb, probably 10x133, 10x166 and 10x200, which is why you dont see it go past 2,000 mhz, but by changing settings manually it can do just about any combination.

    the new amd chips are "locked" that means you cant change the multiplier, because SO many people were buying amd 2500+ and making them go 3200+ that they were losing money <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    There are ways around the lock, but its INCREDIBLY dangerous to your mobo and processor as it involves sticking a wire into two of the pin holes which the processor sits in.
  • OutlawOutlaw Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22112Members
    I was under the impression that the new AMD chips aren't multiplier locked. I know that my T-bred A isn't (1700XP+ running at 2.0Ghz) Somebody also said that a 2400+ XP didn't run at 2.0Ghz normally and I'd like to clear that up. A 2400+ uses the smaller 256k l2 cache and runs at a 266Mhz (effective) front side bus @ 2.0Ghz. Higher rated model numbers (2500+ etc) use either a 512k l2 cache or run at a higher front side bus speed (333 or 400 for instance).
    A 2400+ should be a Tbred-B and there are a lot of steep overclocks with those. try getting a nice heatsink and toying with it. I have an Alpha Pal8045 and it works great. <a href='http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?DEPA=&sumit=Go&description=35%2D112%2D002&searchdepa=0' target='_blank'>Link to Newegg.com's listing of Alpha pal 8045</a>

    also check www.highspeedpc.com and www.frozencpu.com for more supplies. To be honest I don't think your cpu is holding you back for the average game. It really is a blast to over clock so go for it and remember to go in small steps, checking for stabliltiy after each jump.

    If you want to overclock an A64 system I would recommend pushing the hyper transport bus, so that you can increase the cpu speed in small steps.

    Multipliers are usually in half steps. The highest my A7n8x has is 12.5 for example, the lowest being 8.5.


    Another great resource is the hardocp forums, which can be found from the main page, www.hardocp.com
  • OutlawOutlaw Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22112Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--uranium - 235+Dec 14 2003, 12:22 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (uranium - 235 @ Dec 14 2003, 12:22 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Also, an AMD 2400 is plenty, and it certainly doesn't need it. Furthermore, the AMD 2400 doesn't naturally run at even close to 2GHz so it sounds like it's already running at peak capacity <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Yes it does. You're quite wrong. <a href='http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?catalog=343&DEPA=1&submit=property&mfrcode=0&propertycode=&propertycodevalue=4159,3928' target='_blank'>see?</a>

    How does it feel being wrong? I only ask because I've seen you go from thread to thread around here and either flame people or just be extremely rude while you act superior.

    Have a nice day
  • uranium_235uranium_235 Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9478Banned
    AMD support gave me a table when I asked them about this a long time ago, and it specifically states that the 2400 runs at 1.8 ghz, and the 2800 runs at 2.08 ghz.

    BTW: Reported for flamebaiting.
Sign In or Register to comment.