Are These Figures Correct?

Raiden333 · March 2003

<a href='http://www.geocities.com/kitsune/104stats.htm' target='_blank'>http://www.geocities.com/kitsune/104stats.htm</a>

I'm in an argument with a friend about Carapace, and when I gave him that site his only rebuttal is "Those figures are BS!"

Opinions please?

coil · March 2003

To my knowledge, those figures were pretty carefully tested. I haven't personally tried them myself, but I'll vouch for them.

Inexorable · March 2003

Kitsune's the man. Like coil, I haven't gone ahead and tested them myself, but I put my faith in his number crunching abilities.

LoboLeal · March 2003

I haven´t tested, but I only want to say 1 thing:

</span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>CODE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='CODE'>
Base Damage Lerk
10 9/12/15/30
11 9/12/15/20
</td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'>

If this is true due the rounding system, I think this needs to be fixed IMHO.

I think a 50% increase of damage to a lvl3 carapaced lerk is more than 10% increase of damage of lvl1 weapons upgrade.

Edcrab · March 2003

Meh. I really don't know. My experience says one thing, a helpful information-gathering guy says another, and the damnable changelog says something else! Urrgh.
Hopefully any more stat changes will result in perfectly accurate changelogs. You can't tell me all this confusion is actually intended to be ucelsian... unless someone likes feeling dumb.

Shockeh · March 2003

<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>IT'S ALL LIES!!! </span>

No, only kidding. Kitsune's not wrong. And he's got the username I woulda taken if I'd got to it first. Which I didn't. So he got it. Damn.

Raiden333 · March 2003

Thanks all.

Are These Figures Correct?

Comments