Upgradable Fast Reloading

xtcmenxtcmen Join Date: 2004-04-20 Member: 28040Members, Squad Five Blue
<div class="IPBDescription">Like in Gears of War</div>I think it would be cool to have an upgrade that allows you to reload faster like in Gears of War.



How it works: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vAVI7aBzT8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vAVI7aBzT8</a>




But unlike gears of war, the active reload only increases the speed of the reload, and maybe a 10% damage boost or rate of fire increase. And if you miss the active reload, your gun jams and it takes longer.


What do you guys think?

Comments

  • Chris0132Chris0132 Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68262Members
    I'd rather it just be a simple upgrade that increases the reload speed of the gun, like an addon or something, pay more for a faster reloading gun.
  • spellman23spellman23 NS1 Theorycraft Expert Join Date: 2007-05-17 Member: 60920Members
    Ah activated fast reload.... Mini-games while fumbling for the cartridge.

    In Alien Swarm I really didn't like it. It just added an extra bit of frustration.
  • rofldinhorofldinho Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68259Members
    edited August 2010
    It sounds like a cool feature, but I don't think it adds anything to the gameplay, and is in fact a bit annoying, as normally the standard reloads are delayed further just for the game to make fast-reloads worthwhile. Also, in NS it would just be an unwelcome/unnecessary distraction with fast skulks, fades, lerks, etc, flying at you.

    Don't forget that Gears of War is a game where you have a cover system as part of the game's combat mechanism. Hence why fast-reload works in that game, because when you're reloading behind a wall of sandbags or something whilst in the safety of cover, that little pause or breathing space allows you to focus on the fast-reload.

    Also, if something like Catalyst will be implemented later on by the developers, it would render fast-reload completely useless.
  • HarimauHarimau Join Date: 2007-12-24 Member: 63250Members
    Yeah I didn't like Fast Reload in Alien Swarm either. Maybe you could have the commander upgrade reload times...
  • LoeyLoey Join Date: 2009-10-31 Member: 69187Members
    fast reload should only be possible if you're changing mags with a round in the chamber because you dont need to re ###### the weapon
  • Chris0132Chris0132 Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68262Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1795838:date=Aug 23 2010, 06:16 AM:name=Loey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Loey @ Aug 23 2010, 06:16 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1795838"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->fast reload should only be possible if you're changing mags with a round in the chamber because you dont need to re ###### the weapon<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    While I don't give a buggery about the realism, that is actually a good idea. Faster reload if you gun isn't empty.

    It'd encourage players to keep their ammo count in mind, which is an important skill in NS, so having a visible benefit for it would help new marine players master the skill.

    On the flipside, you could add a really distinctive noise for a clip emptying, so aliens know if you do it and will be able to time their attacks to take advantage of it.
  • LoeyLoey Join Date: 2009-10-31 Member: 69187Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1795842:date=Aug 23 2010, 05:54 PM:name=Chris0132)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Chris0132 @ Aug 23 2010, 05:54 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1795842"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->On the flipside, you could add a really distinctive noise for a clip emptying, so aliens know if you do it and will be able to time their attacks to take advantage of it.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    i'd go for realism and say have the 5th last round of each magazine as tracer. a ping to tell you that your magazine is empty is pointless to a marine, whereas a trace round will indicate that he still has a few rounds to go. even though you suggest the sound is for aliens, there would be no reason the weapon would have that feature in the first place
  • Chris0132Chris0132 Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68262Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1795862:date=Aug 23 2010, 09:59 AM:name=Loey)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Loey @ Aug 23 2010, 09:59 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1795862"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->i'd go for realism and say have the 5th last round of each magazine as tracer. a ping to tell you that your magazine is empty is pointless to a marine, whereas a trace round will indicate that he still has a few rounds to go. even though you suggest the sound is for aliens, there would be no reason the weapon would have that feature in the first place<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    The ping isn't supposed to be helpful for the marine, it's supposed to be helpful for the aliens.

    It's not supposed to be an alert, more the mechanics of the gun causing the noise, there are guns in real life that make a distinctive noise when they fire their last shot, and it is generally considered a flaw in the design because it alerts enemies that you're reloading, but as a gameplay feature it would probably be very interesting.

    The idea is you give marines a greater benefit for ammo management, and a greater penalty for not doing it, bring the mechanic out a bit more and hopefully teach people to use it faster.
  • LoeyLoey Join Date: 2009-10-31 Member: 69187Members
    a few rifles like the m1 garand that used stripper clips made that sound, they are now redundant. like i said though, a weapon this far in the future wouldnt have that flaw.
  • Chris0132Chris0132 Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68262Members
    edited August 2010
    'Because it's good for gameplay' is reason enough.

    There isn't any reason why marines would be sent in without heavy armor and dual wielding mininguns and flamethrowers, or why the TSA don't just put sentry guns in every spaceship, other than because it's good for gameplay.
  • schkorpioschkorpio I can mspaint Join Date: 2003-05-23 Member: 16635Members
    how about the other way around - you hold down the reload button, for a slow - but silent reload
  • Kouji_SanKouji_San Sr. Hινε Uρкεερεг - EUPT Deputy The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-05-13 Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    edited August 2010
    <!--quoteo(post=1795893:date=Aug 23 2010, 03:51 PM:name=Chris0132)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Chris0132 @ Aug 23 2010, 03:51 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1795893"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->'Because it's good for gameplay' is reason enough.

    There isn't any reason why marines would be sent in without heavy armor and dual wielding mininguns and flamethrowers, or why the TSA don't just put sentry guns in every spaceship, other than because it's good for gameplay.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    <b>Most likely back-story on that:</b>
    <i>
    The initial first spawn phase-in, doesn't allow for heavy equipment other then the CC to be transported due to interference from the Khaara bacteria. And the TSA is just an underfunded mercenary strikeforce, it's not likely they are going to leave resources behind on stations they have salvaged. Usually those buildings, ships or stations are not the property of the TSA. They're just there on a mission to exterminate the Khaara. And as soon as that has been done, they will probably recycle their precious buildings.

    Maybe that is their payment (resources collected throughout the mission)?</i>
  • intellixintellix Join Date: 2008-03-24 Member: 63950Members
    edited August 2010
    Active reload in my eyes should be included in EVERY game... it makes the game play much more immersive. I don't know about an increased damage output as it may be overpowered (perhaps something minimal) but being able to reload at least a little faster makes things MUCH more interesting. I'd like to hear a direct reason from the developers on why they won't implement this if they choose not to.

    I'm guessing the players here who have anything negative to say about active reloading haven't played Gears of War... you guys say that it sucks in Alien Swarm (not actually played it but now that I know its in there I'll checkt it out). This feature is properly implemented in Gears of War the correct way... perhaps it works best on a control pad like the 360 pad and not so well with the keyboard.

    I don't think that the active reload feature in any way adds to frustration, it makes the gameplay much more immersive cause you find yourself concetrating and you feel like you're more into the game as when you screw up you find yourself cursing and getting edgey :D When you perform a great perfect active reload then you love it and feel a great sense of achievement.

    Aggh second edit! I actually ALSO like the idea of a silent reload... slow but silent.... brilliant but this should be ON TOP of active reload. It adds much more depth to the gameplay.
  • rofldinhorofldinho Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68259Members
    edited August 2010
    <!--quoteo(post=1796400:date=Aug 26 2010, 07:36 PM:name=intellix)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (intellix @ Aug 26 2010, 07:36 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1796400"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Active reload in my eyes should be included in EVERY game... it makes the game play much more immersive. I don't know about an increased damage output as it may be overpowered (perhaps something minimal) but being able to reload at least a little faster makes things MUCH more interesting. I'd like to hear a direct reason from the developers on why they won't implement this if they choose not to.

    I'm guessing the players here who have anything negative to say about active reloading haven't played Gears of War... you guys say that it sucks in Alien Swarm (not actually played it but now that I know its in there I'll checkt it out). This feature is properly implemented in Gears of War the correct way... perhaps it works best on a control pad like the 360 pad and not so well with the keyboard.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Gears of War, as great a game it is (GOW 2 mainly), has already been mentioned, which you seem to have missed. The point was that GOW is a game with a cover system, hence why active reload works well. The game requires you to constantly use cover behind sandbags, objects, etc, which then allows you to have the time and space needed to be able to focus on the reload mechanism. When you're behind cover and reloading for example, you don't need to strafe all over the place to avoid things. In NS, you don't have that luxury, primarily becuase the gameplay in NS is alot faster than GOW's given how quick the aliens move. Do you really want to be looking at the active reload bar when you have lerks and skulks leaping/flying around or at you, fades teleporting, Onos' charging, etc? It would require you to take your eye off the action for a split second on a regular basis, or even focusing mentally on the timing that you've memorised for the "sweet spot" for each weapon - either way, I don't think NS is a game where you get that luxury of a break to be able to concentrate on reloading.

    I mean, GoW is really a bad game to compare to NS, because it's so different. In GOW the enemies tend to hide behind cover themselves, and they're mostly very slow moving. Completely different to NS, where aliens are very fast, can be cloaked/hidden, etc etc. Again, we have a scenario where one game is slow enough for active reloading (because the enemies aren't all over you), but the other isn't. Furthermore, for the majority of enemies/weapons in GOW, it usually takes them a while to kill you, or for an enemy to get you crawling on the ground. In NS, death can be pretty much instant. A fade/Onos can kill you within a few seconds. Again, GOW is a game that is slow enough and gives you enough time to use active reloads effectively (you can take damage whilst reloading and still focus on active reload because it takes them a while usually to kill), whereas NS really isn't.

    If you want a direct reason (not from a developer, but it's still a gameplay theory/design reason), it's this. There's no need for it in NS because NS isn't lacking in abilities/perks/changes for it to need active reload. The real reason why active reloading is needed in Gears of War is because your character has no actual abilities in that game. The only thing that you can do to change your character's effectiveness is to change your weapon - you don't have any genuine additional abilities. Hence why active reload was implemented, as it gives you something extra that increases your character's effectiveness briefly and adds a bit of additional thinking to what would otherwise be a more simple shooter. In NS, there are a number of abilities that may be in the game, all of which can change your character's effectiveness, damage output, potency, strength, speed, etc etc. NS is therefore a game that inherently does not need this active-reload feature to add that bit of complexity/thinking that players enjoy. It's already in there. And as stated before, if we see something like Catalyst in NS2, there'll be absolute no need at all for active reloading.

    It has nothing to do with control pad vs keyboard/mice either, though I do agree that with default controls, active reloading is easier on the control pad by virtue of the reload being directly above the trigger and therefore only needing a few milimetres of movement by the trigger finger to press it. Though this can be binded to a closer key on the keyboard/mouse if it were necessary (I'd use mouse4 to active reload).

    Regarding Alien Swarm, active reload was annoying because again, unlike Gears of War, the game (on higher difficulties) gets very fast and hectic at various points (mainly the "bug horde" areas where loads of them swarm from different areas), so with there being no cover system and too much happening on screen, it's annoying to have reloads where you have a split second to active reload (which is diificult because you're jumping around everywhere avoiding fast bugs). And if you miss the reload, which is easy to do because you're strafing like made and focusing on avoiding the bugs, you then have a longish wait till your gun is ready to fire again. Hence why it's more annoying than useful (plus I don't think active reload in Alien Swarm gives any benefit other than a faster reload, i.e. no damage bonus - though I may be wrong).

    Overall, I'm not dead against active reload, but there's a number of reasons why so few FPS games have implemented it.
  • xtcmenxtcmen Join Date: 2004-04-20 Member: 28040Members, Squad Five Blue
    The best part about Gears' Active Reload system is that if you don't want to reload quicker, then you don't have to. Simply hit reload and it will reload in its regular time.


    The same can be implemented in NS. If your against it, then you don't have to use it. It's simple as that and everyone wins.

    And I feel like we should at least try it because it really is not a bad idea.
  • HarimauHarimau Join Date: 2007-12-24 Member: 63250Members
    edited August 2010
    So what you're suggesting is that we put in a potential advantage where the choice is not a selection of differing advantages, but the choice is only to gain the advantage or to not gain the advantage. You're suggesting we put it in a game where people play to win, in a universe where seeking every advantage ensures a win.
    And then you say it's a choice. Come on now. Do you see the problem? People will seek the advantage, and it will become the status quo. Once it becomes the status quo, then it is no longer an advantage, and its lack becomes a disadvantage. The choice becomes, will you be disadvantaged or will you not? Why? What for?
  • BRICEBRICE Join Date: 2010-07-16 Member: 72453Members
    haha if anything a reload mostly goes bad under combat stress, make a random dice to decide fumbling and w/e that can go wrong, err.
    -1 for this idea.
  • Kouji_SanKouji_San Sr. Hινε Uρкεερεг - EUPT Deputy The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-05-13 Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    <!--quoteo(post=1795249:date=Aug 19 2010, 11:33 PM:name=xtcmen)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (xtcmen @ Aug 19 2010, 11:33 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1795249"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->How it works: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vAVI7aBzT8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vAVI7aBzT8</a><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Anyone else notice the last sound in the video, it is the exact same sound as our PhaseGate <img src="http://members.home.nl/m.borgman/ns-forum/smileys/biggrin.gif" border="0" class="linked-image" />
  • RulgrokRulgrok Join Date: 2007-04-04 Member: 60559Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1796330:date=Aug 25 2010, 11:09 PM:name=schkorpio)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (schkorpio @ Aug 25 2010, 11:09 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1796330"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->how about the other way around - you hold down the reload button, for a slow - but silent reload<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    +1
  • xtcmenxtcmen Join Date: 2004-04-20 Member: 28040Members, Squad Five Blue
    <!--quoteo(post=1796647:date=Aug 28 2010, 07:24 AM:name=Harimau)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Harimau @ Aug 28 2010, 07:24 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1796647"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->So what you're suggesting is that we put in a potential advantage where the choice is not a selection of differing advantages, but the choice is only to gain the advantage or to not gain the advantage. You're suggesting we put it in a game where people play to win, in a universe where seeking every advantage ensures a win.
    And then you say it's a choice. Come on now. Do you see the problem? People will seek the advantage, and it will become the status quo. Once it becomes the status quo, then it is no longer an advantage, and its lack becomes a disadvantage. The choice becomes, will you be disadvantaged or will you not? Why? What for?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    There is a disadvantage. If you miss the active reload, then you Jam and it takes longer to reload. It is more of a gamble. You can play it safe and not use it, or go for the payoff.

    And if you ever played gears, you miss the active all the time. And many of those times causes you to die because you are mid battle.
  • HarimauHarimau Join Date: 2007-12-24 Member: 63250Members
    So what you're saying is, the choice isn't between a disadvantage and the status quo, it's a choice between a disadvantage and probable disadvantage. I'm liking this idea even more.
  • Chris0132Chris0132 Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68262Members
    edited August 2010
    <!--quoteo(post=1796387:date=Aug 26 2010, 04:24 PM:name=Kouji_San)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kouji_San @ Aug 26 2010, 04:24 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1796387"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><b>Most likely back-story on that:</b>
    <i>
    The initial first spawn phase-in, doesn't allow for heavy equipment other then the CC to be transported due to interference from the Khaara bacteria. And the TSA is just an underfunded mercenary strikeforce, it's not likely they are going to leave resources behind on stations they have salvaged. Usually those buildings, ships or stations are not the property of the TSA. They're just there on a mission to exterminate the Khaara. And as soon as that has been done, they will probably recycle their precious buildings.

    Maybe that is their payment (resources collected throughout the mission)?</i><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    I find it hard to believe that it's cheaper to train and equip new soldiers than it is to buy a set of HA and a pair of flamethrowers and just immediately wipe out the aliens rather than dropping a command chair and chewing through hundreds of resources and marines.

    Or that it would be cheaper for whoever owns the ship to keep losing them to alien attacks rather than installing a few autoturrets in big rooms.

    It's gameplay first, then the fluff is written to make it sound vaguely plausible.
  • Dank McShwaggerDank McShwagger Join Date: 2009-06-10 Member: 67784Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1795386:date=Aug 20 2010, 02:04 AM:name=spellman23)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (spellman23 @ Aug 20 2010, 02:04 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1795386"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Ah activated fast reload.... Mini-games while fumbling for the cartridge.

    In Alien Swarm I really didn't like it. It just added an extra bit of frustration.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    agreed, i didnt care much for it in alien swarm either. more so because they put the bar almost out of sight and you would have to take your eyes off your character to find it.

    i agree more with the payed upgrade/attachment for faster reloading rather then the minigame.
  • Kouji_SanKouji_San Sr. Hινε Uρкεερεг - EUPT Deputy The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-05-13 Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    edited September 2010
    <!--quoteo(post=1797037:date=Sep 1 2010, 01:34 AM:name=Chris0132)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Chris0132 @ Sep 1 2010, 01:34 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1797037"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I find it hard to believe that it's cheaper to train and equip new soldiers than it is to buy a set of HA and a pair of flamethrowers and just immediately wipe out the aliens rather than dropping a command chair and chewing through hundreds of resources and marines.

    Or that it would be cheaper for whoever owns the ship to keep losing them to alien attacks rather than installing a few autoturrets in big rooms.

    It's gameplay first, then the fluff is written to make it sound vaguely plausible.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    The Khaara would like to have a word with you <img src="http://members.home.nl/m.borgman/ns-forum/smileys/tongue.gif" border="0" class="linked-image" />

    <i>The bacteria growth most likely interferes with the marine systems on initial spawn, making it impossible to go directly to tier3 tech (hence the vanila marine and only a CC on spawn). Once they have established a presence, the nanite grid gets a small powerboost, to be able to build other structures. For some buildings they need to upgrade/reinforce their buildings on the spot by doing research. Otherwise the new buildings and equipment can't be phased in (or in NS's case, buildings phased in by the MACS for them to build)

    Maybe the TSA are the only ones who have done significant research on the Khaara to be able to pose a threat to it, and they don't want lose their monopoly on this technology. Compared to private businesses that could put up auto turrets, which probably are quite easily infested and destroyed by the Khaara bacterium growth. A wasted investment...

    There is your probable backstory</i>
  • HarimauHarimau Join Date: 2007-12-24 Member: 63250Members
    Or... it's a real time strategy game and research is just the standard. (A fun standard. Who didn't love Age of Empires?) Seriously, who's able to research the things we research in an hour-long game of an RTS, in real life? Please.
  • Kouji_SanKouji_San Sr. Hινε Uρкεερεг - EUPT Deputy The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-05-13 Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    edited September 2010
    <!--quoteo(post=1797959:date=Sep 8 2010, 09:58 PM:name=Harimau)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Harimau @ Sep 8 2010, 09:58 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1797959"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Or... it's a real time strategy game and research is just the standard. (A fun standard. Who didn't love Age of Empires?) Seriously, who's able to research the things we research in an hour-long game of an RTS, in real life? Please.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    But that is the boring way of explaining this away <img src="http://members.home.nl/m.borgman/ns-forum/smileys/tongue.gif" border="0" class="linked-image" />

    Besides, they have transporter, nanobot and space travel technology. Their computers are bound to make our all of our tech combined look like toys. Besides, they're not really researching things. They're just upgrading their tech and ability to spawn them in an bacteria infested environment, is all... Something which can't be transported into a bacteria infested base on initial spawn. And once they have a foothold with basic equipment, their nanotech makes it possible to reinforce their main base to upgrade into the harder hitting tech trees to kick some alien a<i>zz</i> <img src="http://members.home.nl/m.borgman/ns-forum/smileys/sunglasses.gif" border="0" class="linked-image" />
  • HarimauHarimau Join Date: 2007-12-24 Member: 63250Members
    edited September 2010
    Meh. Then in that case, I prefer:
    Various marine teams are currently fighting, under the direction of the TSA administration. Teams that are doing well, get access to better technologies and equipment and such, which are granted by the administration. The Kharaa on the other hand, have all of their abilities lie dormant so as not to waste resources, and their structure changes dynamically (with respect to the situation) in order to counter threats to the hive.
    Nothing <b>too</b> tacky and sci-fi, all fairly natural.
Sign In or Register to comment.