Benchmarking Thread

ReKReK Join Date: 2004-08-30 Member: 31058Members, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Silver
in NS2 General Discussion
Let's start collecting some benchmarking stats to see how the game/engine are performing.

Post your rig and your min/max/avg framerate.
I used Fraps and hopped in a server and tried to knife skulks for a couple minute to get some average use readings.

<b>CPU:</b>
<b>RAM:</b>
<b>Graphics Card:</b>
<b>OS:</b>

<b>Average Framerate:</b>
<b>Minimum:</b>
<b>Maximum:</b>
Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome

Comments

  • ReKReK Join Date: 2004-08-30 Member: 31058Members, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Silver
    <b>CPU:</b> Intel Core i7 920 2.67 GHz (4 cores, 8 with hyperthreading)
    <b>RAM:</b> 6 GB DDR3-10600 Triple Channel
    <b>Graphics Card:</b> Sapphire ATI Radeon 5770 1 GB using Catalyst 10.5
    <b>OS:</b> Windows 7 Pro 64 bit

    <b>Average Framerate:</b> 25.72
    <b>Minimum:</b> 5
    <b>Maximum:</b> 87

    Pretty bad performance considering my specs. Definitely playable though, slow enough that my aiming and movement felt a little weird.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • hartrafthartraft Join Date: 2010-07-16 Member: 72468Members
    edited July 2010
    My setup isnt very good but here goes (side note...this was only after a few minutes of playing and included trying to knife a skulk)


    CPU: AMD athlon II x2 240 processor 2.8gig
    RAM: 2gb ddr2 pc2-6400
    Graphics Card: geforce 9500gt 512mb
    OS:windows xp

    Average Framerate:12.299
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:47

    1280x800 resolution
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • BloodhouseBloodhouse Join Date: 2010-07-14 Member: 72369Members
    Dudes tell us under what resolution you get these FPS
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • hartrafthartraft Join Date: 2010-07-16 Member: 72468Members
    :D 1280 x 800 resolution...edited my post too:P
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • -Nemesis--Nemesis- Join Date: 2010-04-10 Member: 71301Members
    CPU - AMD X4 965
    GFX card - Nvidia GTX 260 (bfg maxcore version)
    Ram - 4gb dual channel
    OS - Windows 7 64bit

    Played on 22" tft @ 1680x1050 Settings to max

    Average FPS seems to be about 40 / 45
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • ptfffptfff Join Date: 2010-07-20 Member: 72611Members
    cpu - i7 930
    ram - 6gb ddr3 1600 @ 1066
    gfx card - 5870 using catalyst 10.8 beta
    os: win7 64
    res: Play in 1440x900 windowed mode

    Average frame: 70
    min:25
    max:dunno... think ive seen it go above 100
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • KarbaKarba Join Date: 2006-09-23 Member: 58040Members, Constellation, Reinforced - Gold
    CPU: AMD Athlon64 x2 4200 2200 Mhz
    RAM: 2gb ddr2
    Graphics Card: Radeon 4670 512mb
    OS:windows 7

    Average Framerate:15
    Minimum:8
    Maximum:23


    Something is very wrong, in all other games when you look to the ground or a wall fps increases noticeably and go beyond 100, in NS2 fps remains the same O_o, it's like if the game drew all the polygons and lights independently of whether you are facing it or not.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • PepeNZPepeNZ Join Date: 2009-05-26 Member: 67485Members
    edited July 2010
    Not to be a smartass but this is an alpha
    There is a lot thats very wrong
    thats why they let us in to find it all so they can move to the beta a bit less broken :)
    good things take time
    by that rationale the end product is going to kick ...
    i cant wait to see the end product knowing what its like right now
    and its cool i get to be a part of the creation process (however minor)

    I havent had time to do decent enough play testing to get any kind of avg framerate
    will edit this post with that info at some stage however.

    Specs

    CPU: Pentium E6300
    RAM: 4GB DDR2
    Graphics Card: nVidia 8800GT
    OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

    Average Framerate:
    Minimum:
    Maximum:
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • SnougarSnougar Join Date: 2007-12-31 Member: 63301Members
    edited July 2010
    Benchmark results at this point of the release is pretty much useless. BUT it would be interesting to look back on :)

    I've noticed that if you host a listen game (non dedicated) you get a huge performance hit. Mainly being of the mini-DoS attacks from clients spamming to connect ahaha. It's actually killed my router twice now, had to set it to low priority with QOS when hosting :P


    <b>CPU:</b> Q6600 @ 3.4GHz (425x8)
    <b>RAM:</b> 6GB DDR2
    <b>Graphics Card:</b> ATI HD5850 (stock)
    <b>OS:</b> Windows 7 64bit

    <b>Average Framerate:</b> 35 (14 when hosting a game with 6 people :x)
    <b>Minimum:</b> 11
    <b>Maximum:</b> 80

    This is at 1680x1050 with High details on ns2_tram.

    Also its hard to compare results without being more strict on the criteria of the benchmarks themselves. What map? settings? resolution? listen server or not? etc etc
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Patrick Swayze's GhostPatrick Swayze's Ghost Join Date: 2010-07-24 Member: 72742Members
    It's pointless to benchmark as framerate optimization will be ongoing for the coming months and years...
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • PepeNZPepeNZ Join Date: 2009-05-26 Member: 67485Members
    sure but wouldn't it be fun to look back in 6 months and see where we were?
    this is almost like a "how has NS2 improved" thread
    i kinda like it
    and be cool if people could do like monthly updates to track the progress :)

    just my opinion of course
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • AshesAshes Join Date: 2010-07-15 Member: 72405Members
    CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 @ 2.00Ghz
    RAM: 4,00 GB
    Graphics Card: ATI Radeon 3650 - 512 MB
    OS: Windows 7 x64

    Resolution: 1280 x 720 (High settings)
    Average Framerate: 8
    Minimum: 3
    Maximum: 20

    Just tested it on high settings, changing it to 'rediculously aweful' doesn't even make that much of a difference to be honest. Just not getting the framerate I should be having, looking at the visuals I'm getting and comparing to other games. (But we all have this problem right now, I know.) Looks mostly to be the complex lighting system and way things are being rendered.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Kouji_SanKouji_San Sr. Hινε Uρкεερεг - EUPT Deputy The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-05-13 Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    Benchmarking an Alpha release are we :P
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Racer1Racer1 Join Date: 2002-11-22 Member: 9615Members
    As a baseline, this is a neat idea. I'd like to see a new benchmarking thread maybe once every two weeks -- to see how engine performance optimization is going. Someone could even make a neat graph.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • SkyrageSkyrage Join Date: 2003-08-27 Member: 20249Members
    edited July 2010
    <!--quoteo(post=1786424:date=Jul 27 2010, 12:03 PM:name=Racer1)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Racer1 @ Jul 27 2010, 12:03 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1786424"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->As a baseline, this is a neat idea. I'd like to see a new benchmarking thread maybe once every two weeks -- to see how engine performance optimization is going. Someone could even make a neat graph.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    I fully support this idea :D

    Oh yeah, benchmark...

    CPU: AMD Athlon 4800+ (yeah, getting on in age)
    RAM: 4 GB DDR2 Dual Channel
    GFX: Geforce 8800GT factory overclocked - 512MB
    OS: Vista 64

    Average framerate: 15 FPS
    Min: 10
    Max: 20
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Jack_DanielsJack_Daniels Join Date: 2010-07-19 Member: 72567Members
    CPU: AMD 955BE Overclocked 3.8 Ghz
    RAM: 6GB
    Graphics Card: Crossfired Radeon HD 4870 & HD 4850
    OS: Windows 7 x64

    Average Framerate: 45fps
    Minimum: 20fps
    Maximum: 90fps
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • SnougarSnougar Join Date: 2007-12-31 Member: 63301Members
    The ultimate engine test. 9000 hydras. 9fps!

    <img src="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5840750/Pictures/MOARhydras2.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" />
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • mortsmorts Join Date: 2010-07-26 Member: 73071Members
    I've set up a google spreadsheet for this and entered in some values.
    If you're not on there, add yourself!

    <a href="https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aq0gjdpo5HDJdGtsTXc5dzFXbUd5VmxNcV9ETVdsZ2c&hl=en&authkey=CJWUmM0M" target="_blank">https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aq...uthkey=CJWUmM0M</a>
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • mu.mu. Join Date: 2007-12-27 Member: 63276Members, Constellation
    <!--quoteo(post=1786489:date=Jul 27 2010, 01:40 PM:name=MaLaKa)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MaLaKa @ Jul 27 2010, 01:40 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1786489"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->The ultimate engine test. 9000 hydras. 9fps!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    are you sure it wasn't.... <b>over 9000?</b>
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • mortsmorts Join Date: 2010-07-26 Member: 73071Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1786496:date=Jul 27 2010, 06:43 PM:name=mu.)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mu. @ Jul 27 2010, 06:43 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1786496"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->are you sure it wasn't.... <b>over 9000?</b><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Don't.. just don't
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • GanJaBFDGanJaBFD Join Date: 2010-07-26 Member: 73031Members
    CPU: 920 OCed to 3.0ghz (8 cores)
    RAM: 12gb triple channel 1148 mhz
    Graphics Card: 260 nvidia GTX
    OS: Vista

    Average Framerate: 40 fps
    Minimum: 1? (had 40 marines builders out at a time in commander mode) while running the server on the same machine...) Normally min is 34
    Maximum: 52
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Random^Random^ Join Date: 2010-07-16 Member: 72452Members
    edited July 2010
    CPU: I7 920 @ 3.80ghz
    RAM: 6GB DDR3
    Graphics Card: Nvidia 275
    OS: 7 64bit

    Average Framerate: 40-45 average, goes to 35 or 50 - 60 depending where I am
    Minimum: 20
    Maximum: 70 - 80

    Running at 1680 x 1050 on High
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • f dotf dot Join Date: 2010-07-27 Member: 73088Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1786496:date=Jul 27 2010, 06:43 PM:name=mu.)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mu. @ Jul 27 2010, 06:43 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1786496"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->are you sure it wasn't.... <b>over 9000?</b><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    No there's definitely 9000.

    I counted all the heads and divided by 3 to make sure!
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • GeneralBowserGeneralBowser Join Date: 2010-05-19 Member: 71801Members
    1440x900
    CPU: i3 2.93 Ghz
    RAM: 4GB DDR3
    Graphics Card: Radeon 4670
    OS: 7 64bit

    Frames: 4797 - Time: 255763ms -<b> Avg: 18.756</b> - Min: 11 - Max: 29
    Resolution: 1440x90
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
Sign In or Register to comment.