NS2 on a Mac and System Requirements?
Flipster
Join Date: 2009-02-18 Member: 66469Members
<div class="IPBDescription">I know someone made one about Linux too.</div>I know someone else already made a post about Linux, but I want to get an iMac for a computer this year. It would be awesome to not have to download Windows in it to play it. I'm not sure if they would do this, I saw there article on it saying they would, but how much longer would Mac users have to wait to buy it? Also, what are the system requirements for this game going to be? I'm not that good with system requirements, so what would be the minimum and maximum requirements for this game?
Example: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
ATI Radeon 2600 PRO
Speakers
Screen
Example: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
ATI Radeon 2600 PRO
Speakers
Screen
Comments
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->A 1.2 GHz Processor, 256MB RAM, a DirectX 9 level graphics card, Windows Vista/2000/XP, mouse, keyboard and of course, an internet connection. We are working hard to make sure NS2 runs well on average hardware without having to upgrade your machine!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<a href="http://www.naturalselection2.com/faq" target="_blank">http://www.naturalselection2.com/faq</a>
These are low system requirements for any modern game. They are looking to possibly port the game over to MAC/Linux down the road, but I am imaging it won't be for some time. You will likely have to install Windows on your MAC if you want to play it when its released.
EDIT: ahh Comprox beat me to it :(
<a href="http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonhd2600/radeonhd2600pro/index.html" target="_blank">http://ati.amd.com/products/radeonhd2600/r...0pro/index.html</a>
Your card you listed is a DirectX 10 card, which is better than DirectX 9 and will easily work with it.
EDIT: Comprox was faster. lol
EDIT: Comprox was faster. lol<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Wow thats confusing lol if I got an iMac, it would probably be this model.
Intel Core 2 Duo 3.06 GHz
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
2GB of 800 MHz ram
24" 1920x1200 screen
Is that good enough to play most games? Thanks. Also, which one is better, ATI or NVIDIA?
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.66 ghz
G-SKILL 4 Gigs of ram
Windows XP 32 bit
Geforce GTX 275 896 MB.
Gigabyte 965p-DS3 motherboard
Intel Core 2 Duo 3.06 GHz
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
2GB of 800 MHz ram
24" 1920x1200 screen
Is that good enough to play most games? Thanks. Also, which one is better, ATI or NVIDIA?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You should be fine, I don't know how much ram that Geforce 8800 GS has, but it should be fine.
As for what is better it depends a lot on the game rather then this is better then the other. It nothing that can be avoided, ATI and NVIDIA both have different internals, and these like some methods better then others. So in one game ATI is better well the other Nvidia is better.
As for what is better it depends a lot on the game rather then this is better then the other. It nothing that can be avoided, ATI and NVIDIA both have different internals, and these like some methods better then others. So in one game ATI is better well the other Nvidia is better.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS has 512mb of video ram. Would I be able to play games like Crysis on it?
Buy a PC...
/me hides
there aint no directx bugga
Buy a PC...
/me hides<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well said.
bugga aye? i see what you did there.
nice made up statistic and in the world market pc is 90%, including school computers, work computers and so on so it would be much lower once you boil it down to NS2 user base
OS wise yes, Gaming wise it is smaller.
I could tell you that the iphone is the fastest emerging gaming platform by market share, I could tell you Mac is growing at a slow rate, I could tell you linux is growing at a smaller rate than Mac in terms of market share by gaming. I could then tell you that for roughly every 9 Windows PC's in the world there is 1 Mac, and for every 100 Windows PC's there is around 5 Linux. Would you believe me? Probably not.
We all know Max has said he'd like to have NS2 on all platforms, just not initially. he even went far enough to say in the Linux thread I think that the DirectX dependent coding was nothing crucial to the engine and could be switched out for other OS. I only have W7 on my macbook for NS, so once NS2 is released on OSX I'll no longer run Windows for any reason (other than VirtualBox for work purposes).
It'll come, be patient. Yes, the Mac and Linux markets aren't huge, but I'd imagine you'd get a pretty high return on the port due to the lack of good games on the platforms right now.
And as I've already stated, an engine that looks this good with Mac/Linux portability will be a source of revenue alone. I think there are plenty of publishers and devs who would jump at the chance for a scalable engine that can go multiplatform with little effort. I just hope NS2 is the first to take advantage of it!