Anything To Discuss

tbZBeAsttbZBeAst Join Date: 2003-01-26 Member: 12755Members
<div class="IPBDescription">round and round</div> Now no doubt some of you will remember me, and some of you won't.

I've been in the NS community since IIRC 1.04. Indeed, if it weren't for NS, its doubtful that playZen, the GSP Shockwave and I run, would be in the healthy state its in now.

I was here for the locking of the discussion board. During my evangelical days I even asked to moderate them. I enjoyed disagreeing with MonsE just for the sake of it (even if in my heart I agreed). I drifted away for a while, playing other things (Planetside) but I still lurked on the boards.

What I noticed was this:

In the 2 odd years of reading the discussion board, very little has changed. I'm not talking about the demographics of the posters, or the general opinions of the average player, I'm talking about the topics.

The perennials are:

Sex offenders and how we should deal with them
The "conflict" in Iraq
American domestic politics
Gun control
Christianity

There's probably some more I've missed, but thats a general roll call. The same topics roll round again and again, the same points made, and counterpointed. New topics created on the same subjects and the zombie discussion lumbers on.

I've drawn 2 possible conclusions from this:

1) These are the topics that are formost in everyone's mind

and possibly

2) There is no point to discussion (and by extension the discussion board) because no-one is actually resolving anything - this is assuming that the discussion board should have a point other than kibbitzing.

Discuss!

Comments

  • SwiftspearSwiftspear Custim tital Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22097Members
    edited October 2004
    Everyonce in a while we get a good scifi topic up and running, for example, there is currently a pretty cool abiotic oil topic on the front page, and a while back there was that 'if the sun suddenly stopped producing light' topic. That being said, you basicly just stated the reason that I avoid the Discussion forum most of the time.

    In light of the whole America VS the world mindset that seems to be forming internationally, I would say you are probably dead on in your proposal that issues involving western, and specifically American issues are on the tops of everyone's head, even the european and other international members of this comunity.

    [edit] in response to #2, we aren't a paid think tank here, since when does resolution have to be a required end to discussion. Some of the issues that we tackle here are pretty huge issues, and some of our more exuberant members aren't exactly brilliant.
  • taboofirestaboofires Join Date: 2002-11-24 Member: 9853Members
    Resolving a problem only happens when both sides enter with an open mind. This is sometimes true of science-based threads, but almost never of the political or religious ones.
  • GrendelGrendel All that is fear... Join Date: 2002-07-19 Member: 970Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor, NS2 Playtester
    The very act of discussion is a worthwhile endeavour in its own right, providing of course that it isn't mistaken for actually doing anything.
  • CMEastCMEast Join Date: 2002-05-19 Member: 632Members
    The discussion board is for people like us who have far too many opinions and no good way of keeping them in. If they are going to leak out then they may as well spill on to our own seperate section of the board instead of polluting the threads of other members and interrupting their discussions of the more mundane aspects of life.
  • WheeeeWheeee Join Date: 2003-02-18 Member: 13713Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    nice one, cmeast. I agree completely.
  • BlueNovemberBlueNovember hax Join Date: 2003-02-28 Member: 14137Members, Constellation
    edited October 2004
    <!--QuoteBegin-taboofires+Oct 19 2004, 07:10 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (taboofires @ Oct 19 2004, 07:10 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Resolving a problem only happens when both sides enter with an open mind.  This is sometimes true of science-based threads, but almost never of the political or religious ones. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I don't think I've had a debate with anyone where I had an open mind. Lack of an opinion constitutes ignorance or apathy, surely. Even if you are not sure about something you generally have already weighed up the pro/cons of either side of the arguement, and will therefore lean slightly towards one point of view.
    Discuss? <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
    --

    [tbZ]BeAst, I'd agree with your first conclusion.
    You picked subjects from these topics:

    Sex offenders and how we should deal with them -> Politics
    The "conflict" in Iraq -> Politics/Religion
    American domestic politics -> Politics
    Gun control -> Politics
    Christianity -> Religion

    The other (aforementioned) topic is science. There really isn't much else that you can discuss in-depth.
    When was the last time you had a deep and interesting arguement with someone about Maths? ("Damn it man! The Cartesian frame of referrence knocks the socks of your dodgy Reformed Scale!")
    --

    I would not draw the conlcusion that these boards are pointless. On the contrary, the topics they cover may not be varried, but they is such a range of sub-topics to keep even the best of our minds stimulated and interested.

    I'm still a fan of Philosophical questions. "What is time?" "Why are we here?" are the age-old examples that always (well, mostly) lead to rich discussion.
    --

    CMEast, too right. <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
    Grendel, lol.
  • SwiftspearSwiftspear Custim tital Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22097Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-BlueNovember+Oct 19 2004, 08:20 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (BlueNovember @ Oct 19 2004, 08:20 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-taboofires+Oct 19 2004, 07:10 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (taboofires @ Oct 19 2004, 07:10 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Resolving a problem only happens when both sides enter with an open mind.  This is sometimes true of science-based threads, but almost never of the political or religious ones. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I don't think I've had a debate with anyone where I had an open mind. Lack of an opinion constitutes ignorance or apathy, surely. Even if you are not sure about something you generally have already weighed up the pro/cons of either side of the arguement, and will therefore lean slightly towards one point of view.
    Discuss? <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
    <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Open mind != lack of opinion, open mind just means the willingness to change ones opinion if reasonable fact is presented. An open minded person would not catagorize themselfs as 'republican' or 'democrat' but rather lean one way or the other based on how they understand, and value, the facts of the matter.

    <!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->
    [tbZ]BeAst, I'd agree with your first conclusion.
    You picked subjects from these topics:

    Sex offenders and how we should deal with them  -> Politics
    The "conflict" in Iraq  -> Politics/Religion
    American domestic politics -> Politics
    Gun control -> Politics
    Christianity -> Religion

    The other (aforementioned) topic is science. There really isn't much else that you can discuss in-depth.
    When was the last time you had a deep and interesting arguement with someone about Maths? ("Damn it man! The Cartesian frame of referrence knocks the socks of your dodgy Reformed Scale!")
    <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Politics and religion aren't the only catagories those topics fall into, all of them (with the exeption of sex offenders, to some degree) are also issues are a firm focus of the American demographic moreso then anywhere else internationally. In in thier own way, they really are all direct and popular issues of American politics.

    There are alot of cool possible discussions that could be going on that fall into religious or political catagories that really have nothing to do with American politics.

    <!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->I would not draw the conlcusion that these boards are pointless. On the contrary, the topics they cover may not be varried, but they is such a range of sub-topics to keep even the best of our minds stimulated and interested.

    I'm still a fan of Philosophical questions. "What is time?" "Why are we here?" are the age-old examples that always (well, mostly) lead to rich discussion.
    --

    CMEast, too right. <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
    Grendel, lol.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Agreed compleatly.
  • taboofirestaboofires Join Date: 2002-11-24 Member: 9853Members
    I am willing to weigh the (real, supported) evidence of both sides, and hear arguements. If another's opinion proves to be a more valid one than I already have, then I change my mind. I would define that as open-minded.

    Another way to look at it is the difference between hearing and listening.
  • BacdeBacde Join Date: 2004-10-17 Member: 32326Members
    Politics, Science, Religion, and Philosophy truly are the main things you can discuss in-depth. Perhaps different interpretations of history, but even that is Iffy. The reason why these subjects are so easily discussed, even when the same points are brought over and over, yet still be entertaining, is that there is no right or wrong. No matter how much we discuss, there still is that *possible* chance that anyone is wrong. Unlike math (previously used as an example) there is no black or white areas. Just different shades of grey.

    Thats what makes these discussions so entertaining.
  • SwiftspearSwiftspear Custim tital Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22097Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-Bacde+Oct 19 2004, 10:42 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Bacde @ Oct 19 2004, 10:42 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Politics, Science, Religion, and Philosophy truly are the main things you can discuss in-depth. Perhaps different interpretations of history, but even that is Iffy. The reason why these subjects are so easily discussed, even when the same points are brought over and over, yet still be entertaining, is that there is no right or wrong. No matter how much we discuss, there still is that *possible* chance that anyone is wrong. Unlike math (previously used as an example) there is no black or white areas. Just different shades of grey.

    Thats what makes these discussions so entertaining. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    That's why science is a fun discussion, you get the oppertunity to throw in math every once in a while and acctually get everyone's perception of the issue a little more obgective, so the discussion moves to a more complicated level.
  • lolfighterlolfighter Snark, Dire Join Date: 2003-04-20 Member: 15693Members
    We have <a href='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83097' target='_blank'>abortion</a> too, now!
  • SwiftspearSwiftspear Custim tital Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22097Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-lolfighter+Oct 20 2004, 04:42 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (lolfighter @ Oct 20 2004, 04:42 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> We have <a href='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83097' target='_blank'>abortion</a> too, now! <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    8 pages isn't exactly an entry level discussion... I read through 4 pages and decided that the both sides were retarded and I didn't want to be part of the discussion.
  • SnidelySnidely Join Date: 2003-02-04 Member: 13098Members
    I noticed something's changed - moderaters' names appear as red on the viewing list instead of orange. What the hell?
  • SwiftspearSwiftspear Custim tital Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22097Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-Snidely+Oct 20 2004, 05:44 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Snidely @ Oct 20 2004, 05:44 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I noticed something's changed - moderaters' names appear as red on the viewing list instead of orange. What the hell? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    No, Super admins appear in read, moderators are still orange.

    And for the record, how is this on topic in any way?
  • SnidelySnidely Join Date: 2003-02-04 Member: 13098Members
    edited October 2004
    It's not, really. I was just curious.

    If you want me to be on-topic, then I'll say that if the purpose of discussion is to arrive at some sort of consensus, it makes sense that the only threads that are continously re-created are the ones that cannot be resolved for one reason or another. For example, this thread is going to die if no-one goes off-topic, since we're all pretty much in agreement.
  • ThardinThardin Join Date: 2004-01-05 Member: 25081Members
    I had an interesting Zerg Invasion topic that mysteriously "disappeared", I don't know why and even searched for it to bump it for a second round but I think it was deleted for some reason.

    It was quite popular and looked at however, and I enjoyed both sides debating over the data.
  • SwiftspearSwiftspear Custim tital Join Date: 2003-10-29 Member: 22097Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-Thardin+Oct 20 2004, 05:59 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Thardin @ Oct 20 2004, 05:59 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I had an interesting Zerg Invasion topic that mysteriously "disappeared", I don't know why and even searched for it to bump it for a second round but I think it was deleted for some reason.

    It was quite popular and looked at however, and I enjoyed both sides debating over the data. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Topics sometimes dissapear when someone risks getting banned over something they said in the topic. It's really hard for mods to go and pull out all the crap people say, so sometimes they just delete the hole thing so that they can deal with it later. (Generally deleated topics are just topics moved to a private administrator forum for review)

    If you didn't recieve any type of warning, you can probably feel fine just remaking the thread, although if that dissappears too, I wouldn't push your luck.
  • CMEastCMEast Join Date: 2002-05-19 Member: 632Members
    I wouldn't say we 'discuss' science exactly. We sometimes find something new thats being done, say "Ooooh" a bit and then discuss its practical/political/ethical usage but science has gone too far and is now too specialised for us to be able to genuinely debate it. The only people who can actually 'discuss' science are those pioneers in their field, we may actually have a few on these forums but the chances are they won't get a good discussion on this forum.

    Thats why politics, religion and philosophy are good subjects, you don't need to know anything to have an opinion <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Sign In or Register to comment.