Big Performance Gain

2»

Comments

  • lordbluewolflordbluewolf Join Date: 2003-03-04 Member: 14287Members
    unless i'm mistaken, an entity is anything on a map that is not specifically a wall. Weldable things are entities, res portals are entities, closed vents are entities, electric bolts are entities, as well as ladders, moving doors, and the like.
  • ByekaByeka Name changed from Freak83 Toronto Join Date: 2003-03-13 Member: 14484Members, Constellation
    That's kinda what I was thinking. Thank you.
  • ElucidElucid Join Date: 2002-11-06 Member: 7385Banned
    <!--QuoteBegin--Flayra+Mar 21 2003, 07:41 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Flayra @ Mar 21 2003, 07:41 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Hey guys,

    Just wanted to update you really quickly with a recent development. I've made a big performance optimization, such that all spawn entities are tracked independently of HL, and are deleted when the map loads. This means there are now 96 less entities on all NS maps! With other improvements from the mappers and some other code changes, this brings some maps below the 200 range (!), and most of the other maps below 300. This should make a HUGE difference in server performance in 1.1 and beyond.

    I won't say that it's at CS performance level yet, but it should be a lot better. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->

    P.S. ...and no, please don't ask for an ETA on it, it'll be ready as soon as it's ready. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Does this mean NS Servers will take up less system resources?
  • AlignAlign Remain Calm Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 5216Forum Moderators, Constellation
    edited May 2003
    Yes.
    But you still shouldn't be doing other stuff at the side of running a server, at least not on the same comp.
    EDIT: Says me, the guy who never hosts a dedicated server... But I still think that^ would be a bad idea.
  • ElucidElucid Join Date: 2002-11-06 Member: 7385Banned
    Hopefully they find a way to make it more like cs where if you have your own dedicated server you could host a few servers
  • SuicideDogSuicideDog Join Date: 2002-11-10 Member: 8104Members
    With the new version .. I could definatly see an p4 2.0 or amd xp2000 hosting two 16 peep servers no problem. (with the chance of slight lag on heavy maps like hera when played for a long time). I have seen my server host a 26 person 1.1 game on a heavy map (amd xp2000) with almost no lag (expect from those ppl in like Turkey!). Flay has done a great job of getting the cpu useage down.

    SHOW YOUR SUPPORT!

    <a href='http://www.natural-selection.org/const.html' target='_blank'>http://www.natural-selection.org/const.html</a>
  • ZdroneZdrone Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 3914Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--SuicideDog+May 14 2003, 06:20 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (SuicideDog @ May 14 2003, 06:20 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> With the new version .. I could definatly see an p4 2.0 or amd xp2000 hosting two 16 peep servers no problem. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Im running 2-18 person servers on a dual 1.266ghz p3 right now. Only time it lags is after a long game and the HMG's start blazing. With the 50% reduction in CPU, I might be able to bump them up to 20 person again.
  • SuicideDogSuicideDog Join Date: 2002-11-10 Member: 8104Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Zdrone+May 14 2003, 04:24 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Zdrone @ May 14 2003, 04:24 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--SuicideDog+May 14 2003, 06:20 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (SuicideDog @ May 14 2003, 06:20 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> With the new version .. I could definatly see an p4 2.0 or amd xp2000 hosting two 16 peep servers no problem. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Im running 2-18 person servers on a dual 1.266ghz p3 right now. Only time it lags is after a long game and the HMG's start blazing. With the 50% reduction in CPU, I might be able to bump them up to 20 person again. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I'm talking about 2 servers (16-18 peeps) on one 2ghz processor and the pings sub 100 .. with peeks up to 200 on extremely heavy maps.
  • shmoblarshmoblar Join Date: 2003-06-08 Member: 17128Members
    dear God, is that her...anus? <!--emo&:0--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wow.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wow.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • NickBlastaNickBlasta Join Date: 2002-11-25 Member: 9859Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Elucid+May 10 2003, 10:33 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Elucid @ May 10 2003, 10:33 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Hopefully they find a way to make it more like cs where if you have your own dedicated server you could host a few servers <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    nice sig.. gg image leecher
Sign In or Register to comment.