Stats. Win, loss and life.
Uh-Oh
Join Date: 2002-11-04 Member: 6917Members
Join Date: 2002-11-04 Member: 6917Members
<div class="IPBDescription">Stats are useful when you know how to use them.</div>Hello. I've seen people <i>mis</i>use stats a lot in arguments about game balance lately.
<!--coloro:#FFFFFF--><span style="color:#FFFFFF"><!--/coloro-->TL;DR: As of today (december 10, 2012) Both these facts are true: Aliens win 74% of the time. Aliens win 56% of the time. They are true if you explain what data is used to get that number (sample pool origin, date, criteria of selection...). <b><u>Thus, stats without context are useless.</u></b><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
Please consider the following before listing stats or inferring knowledge from stats.
<ul><li><!--coloro:#FFFF00--><span style="color:#FFFF00"><!--/coloro-->Poster:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Be precise and transparent so people know you are using accurate and trustworthy data.</li><li><!--coloro:#00FF00--><span style="color:#00FF00"><!--/coloro-->Reader:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Ask yourself if the data is from a reliable source and if it's relevant.</li><li><!--coloro:#FFFF00--><span style="color:#FFFF00"><!--/coloro-->Poster:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> If you are going to use stats as an argument, make it clear and coherent with the argument.</li><li><!--coloro:#00FF00--><span style="color:#00FF00"><!--/coloro-->Reader:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Are the stats supporting the argument? Do they realistically explain the argument, or is it an incorrec conclusion.</li></ul>
<u><b>Precision and clarity.</b></u>
A percentage without context is irrelevant. A percentage without its source is made up.
Where does the info come from? What does it represent exactly?
Most people use ns2stats dot org. Please list your search criteria and the actual numbers that make up the final statistic that you are listing.
<!--coloro:#FF0000--><span style="color:#FF0000"><!--/coloro--><b>Wrong</b> way to use stats:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Marines win 55% of the time.
<!--coloro:#008000--><span style="color:#008000"><!--/coloro--><b>Right</b> way to use stats:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
Source: ns2stats dot org.
Search criteria:
- All games played on servers featured on ns2stats dot org.
- Date: December 1st to December 10th
- Important information: 9% of the games were played on unofficial maps.
- Statistic you want to use: <b>Marines have a 37.83% win rate</b> (608 games out of 1607)
<u><b>Argument:</b></u>
It is thus shown that Aliens win a lot more, if you look at the overall games played. This percentage could be different if looking at individual maps or servers, or looking at older dates.
This might seem obvious or to be too much work, but if you want to be taken seriously, please give us: context and data information (source, dates, etc..)
Otherwise, you're just like 87% of the people and pull stats out of your behind.
<!--coloro:#FF8C00--><span style="color:#FF8C00"><!--/coloro--><u><b>Why context is important:</b></u><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
One issue can have multiple view points depending on what we're looking at. For instance, the perception of a popular issue, balance, is often based on the win/loss ratio of the teams.
Depending on which data you use, your stats can vary greatly.
Are you looking at stats compiled from old data that is irrelevant (previous builds)?
Are you including both competitive and pub play? One could be very different than the other and skew the average.
Are you looking at all the maps, including unofficial ones?
Without knowing what your final stats are compiled from, you cannot know what it represents (a coherent and realistic view of the issue, or a irrelevant number that doesn't match up with reality).
That is why context and data information is so important. It tells us what we are looking at. It's the difference between saying I like beautiful legal-aged woman, rather than I like girls (uh-oh).
See below for an exemple.
Just looking at the ns2stats dot org homepage I see:
<!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->November 26 to December 10, All maps,<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> <b>Aliens win 57.96%</b>
Going into filters and:
- Selecting ONLY build 232 (current build), only <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->pub<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> matches and No mods. Dates unchanged: <b>Aliens win 57.62%</b>
- Selecting ONLY build 232 (current build), only <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->competitive<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> matches and No mods. Dates unchanged: <b>Aliens win 66.45%</b>
<b>Now, to show the disparity between <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->maps<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->:</b>
- Important note: I cannot select only pub or competitive matches, and I cannot select only games played without mods. Dates unchanged:
Refinery: <b>Aliens win 74.09%</b>
Mineshaft: <b>Aliens win 59.62%</b>
Docking: <b>Aliens Win 64.2%</b>
Summit: <b>Aliens Win 63.42%</b>
Veil: <b>Aliens win: 61.17%</b>
That's a <u><b>14.47% difference</b></u> in wins for the aliens.
<b>Now to show disparity between map <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->start location<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->:</b>
- Important note: I cannot select only pub or competitive matches, and I cannot select only games played without mods. Dates unchanged:
Summit Overall:
Atrium start for marines: <b>Marine Wins: 28.57%</b>
Data core start for marines: <b>Marine Wins 32.56%</b>
Flight control start for marines: <b>Marine Wins 38.37%</b>
Sub acces start for marines: <b>Marine Wins 41.84%</b>
That's a <b><u>13.27% difference in wins for marines.</u></b>
<b>Now to show disparity between the <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->most and least balanced<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> start location:</b>
Docking - Start in Departures: <b>55.88% Aliens Win</b>
Refinery - Start in Flow Control (only start location on the map): <b>74.09% Aliens Win </b>
That's a <b><u>18.21% difference</u> in wins for aliens.</b>
Thus, while your average public game sees marines win 42% of the time, your average Mineshaft game sees marines win only 26% of the time. Big difference. This (the discrepancy between maps and start locations) can partly explain why some people feel the game is more or less balanced than others.
<!--coloro:#FF8C00--><span style="color:#FF8C00"><!--/coloro--><!--sizeo:4--><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><u><b>Bottom line, saying Marines win 42% of the time (while true), fails to communicate a lot of necessary information to depict a complex issue, such has the perception of balance. </b></u><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec-->
*Please let me know if I made any errors.
On a final note: Please consider what information <b>is not included</b> in statistics.
For instance, the data I used today (wins and losses), does not included any information about player count, games won or lost in less than 5 minutes (or any other amount of time), presence or absence of a commander, time of day the games were played, server region, player region, latency, disconnects, F4s...
Maybe a significant amount alien wins were of the less-than 5 minutes kind. Maybe servers with over 120 pings favor aliens. Maybe players in europe are affected by the plurality of languages, rendering marines less coordinated because they relly more on communication (this is just an exemple for exemple sake).
Thus, <u><b>a lot of vital information is missing</b></u> to come to a clear and sure-fire "fix" for this issue (win/loss balance). The fix could be simple, complex, singular or plural.
<u><b>One thing is certain, it serves little purpose to incorrectly infer information from incomplete, irrelevant or inaccurate stats!</b></u>
<!--coloro:#FFFFFF--><span style="color:#FFFFFF"><!--/coloro-->TL;DR: As of today (december 10, 2012) Both these facts are true: Aliens win 74% of the time. Aliens win 56% of the time. They are true if you explain what data is used to get that number (sample pool origin, date, criteria of selection...). <b><u>Thus, stats without context are useless.</u></b><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
Please consider the following before listing stats or inferring knowledge from stats.
<ul><li><!--coloro:#FFFF00--><span style="color:#FFFF00"><!--/coloro-->Poster:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Be precise and transparent so people know you are using accurate and trustworthy data.</li><li><!--coloro:#00FF00--><span style="color:#00FF00"><!--/coloro-->Reader:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Ask yourself if the data is from a reliable source and if it's relevant.</li><li><!--coloro:#FFFF00--><span style="color:#FFFF00"><!--/coloro-->Poster:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> If you are going to use stats as an argument, make it clear and coherent with the argument.</li><li><!--coloro:#00FF00--><span style="color:#00FF00"><!--/coloro-->Reader:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Are the stats supporting the argument? Do they realistically explain the argument, or is it an incorrec conclusion.</li></ul>
<u><b>Precision and clarity.</b></u>
A percentage without context is irrelevant. A percentage without its source is made up.
Where does the info come from? What does it represent exactly?
Most people use ns2stats dot org. Please list your search criteria and the actual numbers that make up the final statistic that you are listing.
<!--coloro:#FF0000--><span style="color:#FF0000"><!--/coloro--><b>Wrong</b> way to use stats:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Marines win 55% of the time.
<!--coloro:#008000--><span style="color:#008000"><!--/coloro--><b>Right</b> way to use stats:<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
Source: ns2stats dot org.
Search criteria:
- All games played on servers featured on ns2stats dot org.
- Date: December 1st to December 10th
- Important information: 9% of the games were played on unofficial maps.
- Statistic you want to use: <b>Marines have a 37.83% win rate</b> (608 games out of 1607)
<u><b>Argument:</b></u>
It is thus shown that Aliens win a lot more, if you look at the overall games played. This percentage could be different if looking at individual maps or servers, or looking at older dates.
This might seem obvious or to be too much work, but if you want to be taken seriously, please give us: context and data information (source, dates, etc..)
Otherwise, you're just like 87% of the people and pull stats out of your behind.
<!--coloro:#FF8C00--><span style="color:#FF8C00"><!--/coloro--><u><b>Why context is important:</b></u><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
One issue can have multiple view points depending on what we're looking at. For instance, the perception of a popular issue, balance, is often based on the win/loss ratio of the teams.
Depending on which data you use, your stats can vary greatly.
Are you looking at stats compiled from old data that is irrelevant (previous builds)?
Are you including both competitive and pub play? One could be very different than the other and skew the average.
Are you looking at all the maps, including unofficial ones?
Without knowing what your final stats are compiled from, you cannot know what it represents (a coherent and realistic view of the issue, or a irrelevant number that doesn't match up with reality).
That is why context and data information is so important. It tells us what we are looking at. It's the difference between saying I like beautiful legal-aged woman, rather than I like girls (uh-oh).
See below for an exemple.
Just looking at the ns2stats dot org homepage I see:
<!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->November 26 to December 10, All maps,<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> <b>Aliens win 57.96%</b>
Going into filters and:
- Selecting ONLY build 232 (current build), only <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->pub<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> matches and No mods. Dates unchanged: <b>Aliens win 57.62%</b>
- Selecting ONLY build 232 (current build), only <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->competitive<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> matches and No mods. Dates unchanged: <b>Aliens win 66.45%</b>
<b>Now, to show the disparity between <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->maps<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->:</b>
- Important note: I cannot select only pub or competitive matches, and I cannot select only games played without mods. Dates unchanged:
Refinery: <b>Aliens win 74.09%</b>
Mineshaft: <b>Aliens win 59.62%</b>
Docking: <b>Aliens Win 64.2%</b>
Summit: <b>Aliens Win 63.42%</b>
Veil: <b>Aliens win: 61.17%</b>
That's a <u><b>14.47% difference</b></u> in wins for the aliens.
<b>Now to show disparity between map <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->start location<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->:</b>
- Important note: I cannot select only pub or competitive matches, and I cannot select only games played without mods. Dates unchanged:
Summit Overall:
Atrium start for marines: <b>Marine Wins: 28.57%</b>
Data core start for marines: <b>Marine Wins 32.56%</b>
Flight control start for marines: <b>Marine Wins 38.37%</b>
Sub acces start for marines: <b>Marine Wins 41.84%</b>
That's a <b><u>13.27% difference in wins for marines.</u></b>
<b>Now to show disparity between the <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->most and least balanced<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> start location:</b>
Docking - Start in Departures: <b>55.88% Aliens Win</b>
Refinery - Start in Flow Control (only start location on the map): <b>74.09% Aliens Win </b>
That's a <b><u>18.21% difference</u> in wins for aliens.</b>
Thus, while your average public game sees marines win 42% of the time, your average Mineshaft game sees marines win only 26% of the time. Big difference. This (the discrepancy between maps and start locations) can partly explain why some people feel the game is more or less balanced than others.
<!--coloro:#FF8C00--><span style="color:#FF8C00"><!--/coloro--><!--sizeo:4--><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo--><u><b>Bottom line, saying Marines win 42% of the time (while true), fails to communicate a lot of necessary information to depict a complex issue, such has the perception of balance. </b></u><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec-->
*Please let me know if I made any errors.
On a final note: Please consider what information <b>is not included</b> in statistics.
For instance, the data I used today (wins and losses), does not included any information about player count, games won or lost in less than 5 minutes (or any other amount of time), presence or absence of a commander, time of day the games were played, server region, player region, latency, disconnects, F4s...
Maybe a significant amount alien wins were of the less-than 5 minutes kind. Maybe servers with over 120 pings favor aliens. Maybe players in europe are affected by the plurality of languages, rendering marines less coordinated because they relly more on communication (this is just an exemple for exemple sake).
Thus, <u><b>a lot of vital information is missing</b></u> to come to a clear and sure-fire "fix" for this issue (win/loss balance). The fix could be simple, complex, singular or plural.
<u><b>One thing is certain, it serves little purpose to incorrectly infer information from incomplete, irrelevant or inaccurate stats!</b></u>
Comments
Well, approximately 50% of people do have sub-median intelligence, what do you expect?
<i>'Thus, while your average public game sees marines win 42% of the time, your average Mineshaft game sees marines win only 26% of the time. Big difference. This (the discrepancy between maps and start locations) can partly explain why some people feel the game is more or less balanced than others.'</i>
Because in a lot of cases people come and complain after played a few hours on certian map and they never tell us what maps or where they started, and a lot of the time, they dont see why this infomation matters.
I wish UWE did random starting points for both teams, not just a choice between two. It would gave a lot new game experience.
I wish UWE did random starting points for both teams, not just a choice between two. It would gave a lot new game experience.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think random spawn locations are one big problem of the current balance situation. Because of the asymmetric design of the races it is nearly impossible to balance a map for random start locations. If you balance a start location properly for one race, the chance of it being better/worse for the other race is quite high.
Mineshaft - Start in Flow Control (only start location on the map): <b>74.09% Aliens Win </b><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
there is no flow control in mineshaft.
and mineshaft definetely does not have just one starting location. Neither for aliens nor for marines
and mineshaft definetely does not have just one starting location. Neither for aliens nor for marines<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thank you, I meant Refinery. It has been fixed.
Othewise a good read and reminds me of my Stats modules in maths...
Its a shame you didn't show the % win when there are long/close spawns and % wins depending on the length of games.
I imagine the longer the game the more likely aliens win and the closer the spawns the more likely marines win.
You still have only half the information.
Othewise a good read and reminds me of my Stats modules in maths...
Its a shame you didn't show the % win when there are long/close spawns and % wins depending on the length of games.
I imagine the longer the game the more likely aliens win and the closer the spawns the more likely marines win.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks, fixed to make it more clear. The information for duration of games is partially available on the ns2stats site. It's actually very interesting how it fluctuates between both sides. Look at this:
<img src="http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/3762/winsbyduration.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" />
<!--quoteo(post=2042963:date=Dec 10 2012, 11:25 AM:name=MisterNubs)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MisterNubs @ Dec 10 2012, 11:25 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2042963"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Now get the time on wins and let's see where the win percentage sits.
You still have only half the information.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I've got very little information. That's the message I'm trying to get through with this thread. Stats do not draw a complete picture.
<!--quoteo(post=2042983:date=Dec 10 2012, 12:13 PM:name=Champlo0)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Champlo0 @ Dec 10 2012, 12:13 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2042983"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Nice to see someone using statistics non idiotically. This obsession with winrate reminds me of kids on LoL and LoLKing.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I believe win / rate is important up to a point. My problem was that people were claiming stats without source or thought about what they represented, and thus seemed highly inaccurate to me.
Anyone can make numbers seem to indicate something, but it's only when considered carefully that they really mean anything. I loathed stats without context.
It's primarily to encourage people to think about what a number means, how it came to be, and if it's worth believing and sharing.
I've seen claims of marines or aliens (or protoss) winning or losing or (calling a truce) anywhere from 5% to 95% of matches, based on stats gathered from the interwebs.
It's lead to counter constructive arguments and has wildly exaggerated or undermined the real issues (depending on the viewpoint and the stat used to prove it).
There is a lot of "THE SKY IS FALLING" or "Stop whining its super balanced" claims, whereas reality is somewhere in between.
The time info is probably the most interesting
I'd really would like to see how effect certain weapons or lifeforms are on certain maps
Jetpacks dominate on Mineshaft more than any other map; as an example
Knowing what tech is good where will probably have a far greater impact on helping to balance the game down the road than just looking at raw win rates
Also when ARCs aren't broken and actually shoot when you scan and stop getting stuck we'll probably see that alien win % go down at least a little
If everyone was getting 70+ frames you'd see a lot more marine wins as well
Stuff that UWE already is aware of I'm sure, but it's still interesting to think about how they might handle the next few updates
-
90% of people think they're not in that sub-median part