NS2 Server Specs and Performance

Comments

• Whosat Singapore Join Date: 2006-11-03 Member: 58301Members, Reinforced - Shadow

  October 2012

  Wow, thanks for compiling all those info!

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• woody SoCal Woody56 Join Date: 2004-02-14 Member: 26541Members

  October 2012

  Numbers should explode by the end of the mo for sure

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• falc Join Date: 2011-03-18 Member: 87128Members

  October 2012

  This thread should be sticky! :)

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Zeikko Join Date: 2007-12-16 Member: 63179Members, Squad Five Blue, NS2 Map Tester

  October 2012

  The following servers are also run on the Archaea server:
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=53" target="_blank">http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=53</a>
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=148" target="_blank">http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=148</a>
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=52" target="_blank">http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=52</a>
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=54" target="_blank">http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=54</a>

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• ScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow

  October 2012

  Updated.
  
  Thanks Zeikko, Woody, and OldAssGamer

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• eLbot Join Date: 2012-09-13 Member: 159229Members

  October 2012

  It's really worth mentioning that any server perfs that you inspect that show a long time on a stale map (4+hrs or greater) are near enough useless to determine hardware performance, as the software starts to cause issues unless it's nudged along from map to map frequently (<3hrs to be safe)

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Silent262 Join Date: 2012-09-21 Member: 160267Members

  October 2012

  You are my hero. Very useful information to have..... What would be VERY awesome is postings with peak processor/memory load stats.
  
  On a less serious note:
  I would like graphs. And charts. Colors are preferred. Sweeping curves. Much data to organize.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• ScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow

  October 2012

  <!--quoteo(post=1986309:date=Oct 2 2012, 02:41 PM:name=Silent262)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Silent262 @ Oct 2 2012, 02:41 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1986309"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->You are my hero. Very useful information to have..... What would be VERY awesome is postings with peak processor/memory load stats.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
  I just confirmed that this can't be done with the current data outputted, but I made a request for it, though I doubt we'll see anything until after v1.0. I've personally been pushing for a better way to compare server performance to specs for a while so we can get out of the realm of anecdotes into the realm of data.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Silent262 Join Date: 2012-09-21 Member: 160267Members

  October 2012

  Well, to be honest, I meant that it would be nice if server ops could provide it. I will try to post the info from the TP server (jest box) ASAP. Have to get it populated first.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• ScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow

  October 2012 edited October 2012

  Just wanted to post a quick update on performance/hardware load I got from the v1.0 launch. Its the Team156.com|Seattle server with four full 20 player servers:
  CPU: 80%
  RAM: 6887MB
  Network:
  <u>All Four Servers</u>
  DL Rate = 232 KB/s
  UL Rate = 696 KB/s
  DL Vol = 815 MB/hr
  UL Vol = 2447 MB/hr
  <u>Per Server</u>
  DL Rate = 58 KB/s
  UL Rate = 174 KB/s
  DL Vol = 204 MB/hr
  UL Vol = 612 MB/hr
  
  <a href="http://imgur.com/Vo9Bv" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/Vo9Bv.png" border="0" class="linked-image" /></a>
  <a href="http://imgur.com/FTPVY" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/FTPVY.png" border="0" class="linked-image" /></a>
  <a href="http://imgur.com/m3Wdp" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/m3Wdp.png" border="0" class="linked-image" /></a>
  <a href="http://imgur.com/SoxEh" target="_blank"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/SoxEh.png" border="0" class="linked-image" /></a>

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Whosat Singapore Join Date: 2006-11-03 Member: 58301Members, Reinforced - Shadow

  October 2012

  Thanks for the info! Very useful for us! :)

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Gnolevil Join Date: 2012-11-02 Member: 166143Members

  November 2012 edited November 2012

  Hello gentlemen,
  
  I figured I'd contribute to the cause here and share the data I have.
  I run the [GG] servers. I currently have 4 running on this one box. All of these are 24 player.
  I've been watching the console output for my servers (And lol'ing pretty hard at the rage but I digress ...) and been seeing quite a few complaints on lag.
  
  Here is the hardware specs:
  2x Xeon E5-2620s @ 2.00 Ghz
  64GB DDR3 1333 ECC REG RAM
  6x 300GB SASII 15K - RAID 10
  2x bonded 1Gbps Links
  
  Here is the chart from [GG] #3
  <img src="http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/765/gg3s.png" border="0" class="linked-image" />
  
  
  Here is the chart from [GG] #22
  <img src="http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/5364/gg22.png" border="0" class="linked-image" />
  
  
  Server side usage (Just from me watching it. I do not have actual numbers):
  CPU: ~15 - 20% (24 Logical cores)
  RAM: ~800MB - 1.25GB per instance
  NET: ~1.7 Mbps per instance
  
  Regardless, it seems that the server runs fairly well on the E5 series processors if I do say so myself. I'd expect better performance out of the 2690 which is clocked in at 2.9Ghz. The graphs don't really show the actual tickrate very well, but I've noticed it hovers around 12 - 20 on average and takes a hard dive to single digits every now and then.
  
  I believe this particular setup could be used for high density, medium slot servers (16 - 20).
  
  I plan on bringing up a few more smaller ones and see how they perform.
  
  What do you guys think? Maybe speed is the answer here O.o

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• ScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow

  November 2012

  Thanks for posting your server specs! However, those specs and the graphs you posted shows your hardware is having trouble handling running NS2, at least with 24 players. The best performing servers don't show any tickrate drop, acceptable ones never drop below 20, and at the very least it should always stay above 10. Your servers are dropping down to a tickrate of 0. I'd suggest either upgrading to the 2.9GHz hardware or dropping your playercount down to 8-10 players.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Whosat Singapore Join Date: 2006-11-03 Member: 58301Members, Reinforced - Shadow

  November 2012

  Yes sir, 2.0 Ghz is pretty low for a NS2 Server. You should only be running 8-10 players max with that speed. That would be the reason for this:
  
  <!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I've been watching the console output for my servers (And lol'ing pretty hard at the rage but I digress ...) and been seeing quite a few complaints on lag.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Gnolevil Join Date: 2012-11-02 Member: 166143Members

  November 2012

  Hey ScardyBob,
  
  Thanks for the info. I'm going to run some 12 and 16 player servers and see how they go.
  I am also going to experiment with the 2.9Ghz hardware
  
  I do have one question (Apologies if I missed the answer somewhere):
  Is work under way to make the server application more multi-core friendly?

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• endar Join Date: 2010-07-27 Member: 73256Members, Squad Five Blue

  November 2012

  Making the server more multi-core friendly is a double edged sword really. Sure it would be nice to have a server take advantage of multiple cores, to achieve the required performance. But that would mean less servers per physical host. The time spent making it parallel could probably be better spent reducing the actual amount of cycles required to achieve the same goal.
  
  I'm not sure how most game servers are run, but I believe its mostly a single core experience.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Gnolevil Join Date: 2012-11-02 Member: 166143Members

  November 2012

  Partly the reason I was curious about the multi core part was due to the current market of high end enterprise level processors. The current E series Xeon lineup does not focus on speed. They have a lower clock, but their architecture and sheer core count make them able to some serious work. For example, their E7-4850 has 10 cores clocked at 2.0Ghz. The fastest core they have right now is the E5 - 2690 @ 2.9Ghz (Turbo 3.8 Ghz).
  
  Personally, I think of the Xeons vs i5/7 as freight trains vs sports cars. They are not as fast, but can move a lot.
  
  Anywho .. I do have some data for the 2690. I installed two into my server last night and got some great data from it.
  Firstly, the boost in clock rate did help. The jump from 2.0 to 2.9 did make a noticeable difference. My 24 player server runs much better. The rubber banding issue is gone, but the tick rate still gets hit hard.
  
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=11432" target="_blank">[GG] #22 - 24 Players</a>
  
  
  Here is the 16 player server. So far, it's running very well.
  
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=13328" target="_blank">[GG] #5 - 16 Players</a>
  
  I also did some testing regarding the Turbo Boost for Xeons. The server application does not put enough load on the processor, even with a full 24 players, to fully activate the turbo boost. The 2690, for instance, runs at 1.2 Ghz idle (X9DRI-LN4F+ -> You need to enable EIST (Speed stepping) in order to enable Turbo). Under a fully loaded server, the CPU will only rise to 1.4 - 1.6 Ghz.
  I supposed I could try this again and disable HT and lock each instance to 1 core.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• horrorhorst Join Date: 2012-11-06 Member: 167587Members

  November 2012 edited November 2012

  hey,
  
  ive noticed that my servers arent listed @ <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/" target="_blank">http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/</a> so i will post my specs here.
  
  Hamburger-Ballerbude #1 - 85.114.138.175:27015
  Hamburger-Ballerbude #2 [NS-Stats] - 85.114.138.175:27017
  Hamburger-Ballerbude #3 [NS-Stats] - 85.114.138.176:27015
  
  Hardware:
  Intel Xenon E 1230 @ 3,2 GHZ imo
  16 GB ECC -Ram
  1gbit uplink
  Host-OS: ESX
  Instance-OS: Windows Server 2008 R2 (64bit)
  
  
  
  horrorhorst

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• CLARK_KENT Vancouver, Canada Join Date: 2002-11-21 Member: 9508Members, Reinforced - Silver

  November 2012 edited November 2012

  I'll add our newest server rental, since Multiplay doesn't seem to be on this list.
  
  We rent from <a href="http://www.multiplaygameservers.com/" target="_blank">Multiplay Game Servers</a>, the same servers as UWE's official ones.
  
  Our gaming community wanted one that was close to us (the majority of us live in Vancouver, BC, Canada), or at least west coast, and we used to run a Seattle location with NFO for NS1 for many years. We were wanting to go back to NFO for all the years of good service, but they were unable to provide us with a server at time of writing. NS2servers.com was another provider we were looking at, and we were looking forward to their California location, but that is no longer in the works, and Las Vegas is now their most westward location (we were not getting good routing to that location from our computers).
  
  So, Multiplay was one of the few last options. It wasn't an instant setup as the Seattle location had not yet had NS2 installed. About 4 hours later, we were good to go with 16 slots. Immediately, the routing was quite nice for our members, however, the server rate was fluctuating between 10 and 30. While many of the gaming community said it was okay, myself, having played a lot on many servers, especially those on NS2servers, the servers weren't performing. While the game itself seemed smooth to play, my hit reg was quite poor.
  
  I sent another support ticket and got an answer within 2 hours. They agreed the server was performing poorly, so they decided to move us to another one, which they claim has an Intel E3-1270, and from their website, each NS2 instance is on its own dedicated core. Another 2 hours later, they were ready to move us. Ever since then, the server has been performing awesome! Server rates average anywhere between 29 and 30 (<a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=16114" target="_blank">graph here</a>). I bumped it up to 18 slots from 16, and the server is still performing the same. No lag. Great hit reg. Low latencies.
  
  We're quite happy with the results! Multiplay comes highly recommended. Not that I have a lot of experience with web administration, but their Clan Forge web admin system seems great, which also allows you to upgrade slots/services, etc., in a self-service fashion. And there is a Clan Pay system, which allows members (or anyone else with the URL link for that matter) to donate to and automatically credit the account (via cc and PayPal).
  
  Support response times for their ticketing system average between 2 to 6 hours, which is reasonable. Their support staff seem friendly too. They do have a live support chat that is not always on 24/7, but close to (they cite staff shortage), and they're reasonably friendly and knowlegeable for a Tier 1 first point of contact.
  
  Multiplay [OldF.net] Seattle West - No Lag Fast CPU
  74.209.160.101:27015
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=16114" target="_blank">http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=16114</a>
  
  <img src="http://bcvolleyball.com/pr/oldf_hour_nov6.png" border="0" class="linked-image" />

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Whosat Singapore Join Date: 2006-11-03 Member: 58301Members, Reinforced - Shadow

  November 2012

  <!--quoteo(post=2008351:date=Nov 4 2012, 01:46 AM:name=Gnolevil)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Gnolevil @ Nov 4 2012, 01:46 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2008351"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Partly the reason I was curious about the multi core part was due to the current market of high end enterprise level processors. The current E series Xeon lineup does not focus on speed. They have a lower clock, but their architecture and sheer core count make them able to some serious work. For example, their E7-4850 has 10 cores clocked at 2.0Ghz. The fastest core they have right now is the E5 - 2690 @ 2.9Ghz (Turbo 3.8 Ghz).
  
  Personally, I think of the Xeons vs i5/7 as freight trains vs sports cars. They are not as fast, but can move a lot.
  
  Anywho .. I do have some data for the 2690. I installed two into my server last night and got some great data from it.
  Firstly, the boost in clock rate did help. The jump from 2.0 to 2.9 did make a noticeable difference. My 24 player server runs much better. The rubber banding issue is gone, but the tick rate still gets hit hard.
  
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=11432" target="_blank">[GG] #22 - 24 Players</a>
  
  
  Here is the 16 player server. So far, it's running very well.
  
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/detail.php?id=13328" target="_blank">[GG] #5 - 16 Players</a>
  
  I also did some testing regarding the Turbo Boost for Xeons. The server application does not put enough load on the processor, even with a full 24 players, to fully activate the turbo boost. The 2690, for instance, runs at 1.2 Ghz idle (X9DRI-LN4F+ -> You need to enable EIST (Speed stepping) in order to enable Turbo). Under a fully loaded server, the CPU will only rise to 1.4 - 1.6 Ghz.
  I supposed I could try this again and disable HT and lock each instance to 1 core.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
  
  There has been loads of talk just a while back about the Turbo Boost feature. Something about changing the C-something state in the BIOS. Try searching it.
  
  16-player servers need around 3.4 GHz to maintain a stable tick rate (UWE Official Servers run at 3.5GHz from what I understand, and they still suffer slightly at the end game sometimes. One of their servers crashed and was locked out after playing a 40-minute game where the entire map was fully cysted less one marine base).

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Gnolevil Join Date: 2012-11-02 Member: 166143Members

  November 2012

  <!--quoteo(post=2016502:date=Nov 8 2012, 09:07 PM:name=Whosat)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Whosat @ Nov 8 2012, 09:07 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2016502"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->There has been loads of talk just a while back about the Turbo Boost feature. Something about changing the C-something state in the BIOS. Try searching it.
  
  16-player servers need around 3.4 GHz to maintain a stable tick rate (UWE Official Servers run at 3.5GHz from what I understand, and they still suffer slightly at the end game sometimes. One of their servers crashed and was locked out after playing a 40-minute game where the entire map was fully cysted less one marine base).<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
  
  Hey Whosat,
  
  Regarding the Turbo Boost feature, you do need to enable c-state in the BIOS (For this particular motherboard). However, that feature downclocks the CPUs when they are not significantly loaded. Since these motherboards are enterprise level boards, you cannot edit clock rates.
  
  Since then, I have migrated our servers to another dedicated box with the following specs:
  Xeon E3-1270 @3.4Ghz
  8GB RAM ECC
  2x 1TBs - RAID1
  
  I'm currently running 4 servers on that box and they are doing quite well. The 24 palyer is averaging around 25 ticks. The 20 player servers are 29-30.
  I think it might be safe to say that ~3.4 Ghz is the safe number for a solid 20 player.
  
  Here are the links to devicenull if you want to check them out:
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/servers/16434/173.193.175.226:27016/" target="_blank">Server #1 - 24</a>
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/servers/16546/173.193.175.226:27018" target="_blank">Server #2 - 20</a>
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/servers/16547/173.193.175.226:27020/" target="_blank">Server #3 - 20</a>
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/servers/16550/173.193.175.226:27022/" target="_blank">Server #4 - 20</a>
  
  
  Hope all this info help guys!

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• ScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow

  November 2012

  Alright, I updated the op with some new servers and fixing the broken links. Let me know if there are any issues.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• warbucks Join Date: 2011-06-16 Member: 104794Members

  December 2012

  Figure I'd post our server here:
  
  <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/servers/52376/69.39.236.93:27015" target="_blank">gcgaming.net | chicago (69.39.236.93:27015)</a>
  
  Specs:
  
  E3-1230 @ 3.3ghz
  16GB of RAM
  
  Running a 20 slot server (among other games as well).
  
  Server tickrate seems to be quite good at this player count.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• CoTTon Join Date: 2005-02-28 Member: 42773Members

  December 2012

  Unfortunately this page needs to be updated.
  
  Everyone single link is dead because of an issue with Device Null's server - it wiped everyone's server in the beginning of Dec and then when it came back it gave everyone new links.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• MrAgent Join Date: 2003-05-19 Member: 16487Members, Constellation

  December 2012

  Might as well add my server here
  
  1ABDbags.com VA/WashDC NS2Stats
  ns2.1abdbags.com
  
  Hardware
  CPU: Intel i7 970 @ 3.4ghz (may overclock this if needed.
  RAM: 24GB
  Other: Running on a Fusion-io ioDrive2 2.4TB drive (faster than any other SSD out there)
  Host: Windows Server 2012

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• AlphaWolf Join Date: 2003-01-11 Member: 12175Members

  December 2012 edited December 2012

  The devnull links just show blank stat pages for me (I think probably for the reason CoTToN pointed out).
  
  I have an opportunity to acquire a Xeon x3470 3.0ghz 8GB ram server at no cost (it's at my house right now, and I don't think its owner really cares to keep it anymore, not to mention he owes me quite a bit of cash - interest free too.) Also, getting a reliable pipe for hosting services from my house will cost me about $50 a month more than I pay now (not a huge deal) and I can easily allocate 3Mb to this purpose 24/7.
  
  This will be running bare-metal (as in, no VM) with no other services running. How many players could that support? And is it worth the monthly price for the connection, or would it be cheaper to get a suitable VPS?

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• mbrick Join Date: 2013-01-24 Member: 181869Members

  January 2013 edited January 2013

  <!--quoteo(post=2052937:date=Dec 29 2012, 09:35 AM:name=AlphaWolf)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AlphaWolf @ Dec 29 2012, 09:35 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052937"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->The devnull links just show blank stat pages for me (I think probably for the reason CoTToN pointed out).
  
  I have an opportunity to acquire a Xeon x3470 3.0ghz 8GB ram server<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
  Yes the links all reset. You can also browse all servers <a href="http://ns2servers.devicenull.org/" target="_blank">here</a> if you are looking for a specific one.
  
  That processor is a 2.93 and up to 3.6ghz turbo. I suspect you could probably run an 18 player server. That's just going off clock speed, it is a bit older tech so maybe a few less. Be sure turbo boost is on in the bios, and make sure in Windows the energy settings are set to high performance. It's not hard to set up and try...
  
  What speed connection do you have now and what are you quoting the extra price for?

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• unter_hosen Join Date: 2003-01-05 Member: 11858Members, Constellation

  February 2013

  All
  
  I thought I would post our servers up in here. I look after the T W A T servers (Team Work And Tactics).
  
  We have just installed a new dedicated box in the UK heres the specs
  
  Intel i7 3930k running @ 4.6GHz (all the time)
  16GB Corsair Vengence RAM @ 1600MHz
  Dual Samsung 840 Pro 128GB SSDs in RAID 1
  
  This is running the client 4920 build so we can fully comply with the ENSL consistency checking.
  
  Any servers running on this box will be on the IP 91.204.210.71 and will be identified in game with 4.6GHz appended to the name.
  
  Our original dedicated server is installed in France near Paris and the spec of this is...
  
  Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.6GHz
  64GB RAM ECC (not sure of the speed, I didnt build it)
  Dual Intel 320 SSD 120GB
  
  I will be putting all different kinds of servers up all the time so keep an eye out in the game list and I hope to see some of you guys on there.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• Bouba Join Date: 2013-11-10 Member: 189253Members

  February 2016 edited February 2016

  We are running under a BlueFang Solution 24 slot server and to be honest it rocks ! on a full deep game tickrate is pretty stable and the ping is pretty good , the guys deserve to be known as the best support i ever met , i doubt anybody would be unhappy with them.

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
• GhoulofGSG9 Join Date: 2013-03-31 Member: 184566Members, Super Administrators, Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Developer, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Squad Five Silver, Reinforced - Supporter, WC 2013 - Supporter, Pistachionauts

  February 2016 edited February 2016

  Bouba wrote: »

  We are running under a BlueFang Solution 24 slot server and to be honest it rocks ! on a full deep game tickrate is pretty stable and the ping is pretty good , the guys deserve to be known as the best support i ever met , i doubt anybody would be unhappy with them.

  
  
  
  
  Please check the date of the OP and last post before resurrecting something ancient

  0 Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome