Why does every thread about this topic take so painfully long to be locked?
I swear the second I post a spamy topic, or start a topic deemed “controversial” it would be locked in seconds…however these things seem to live on for pages and pages.
<!--QuoteBegin-L3G+Sep 10 2004, 10:18 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (L3G @ Sep 10 2004, 10:18 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Dudes... He has PHAT dyslexia so SUYF on the spelling... asshats! <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> If someone has dyslexia so bad that they can't type a coherent sentence, then they should run everything they type through a spellchecker before they post it. It's not like they're hard to find.
I have difinitive proof that 9/11, amoung other things, was planned and executed by the same people who put the mind control nanites in mayo (ever wonder why they put it on EVERYTHING by default, and half the time when you specifically request that they dont?).
No no no, i was wrong i tell you it was the nazi space zombie pirates planning on the invasion of the german sausage but that idiot franze was looking at comics at the controls when the ufo crashed.A nano second before the pirates died, S.N.C, (space nazi control) teleported their ship and them to their headquarters. During the teleportation, the half part of the ship got uncovered by the force shield so it crashed through the building and the burnt metal turned into liquid metal and oozed away in to the center of the earth. SO DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?! IT IS SIMPLE I SAY SIMMMMMPLLLLLE!@!!!!11
ShockehIf a packet drops on the web and nobody's near to see it...Join Date: 2002-11-19Member: 9336NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators, Constellation
Right, pre-lock....
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
<!--QuoteBegin-L3G+Sep 10 2004, 11:18 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (L3G @ Sep 10 2004, 11:18 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Dudes... He has PHAT dyslexia so SUYF on the spelling... asshats! <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> My brother has dyslexia... He types way better than that. So does one of my friends. She types even better than my brother does.
If he truly has dyslexia, then he should make an effort and proofread his posts a few times, running it through a spellchecker before posting as well.
Private_ColemanPhD in Video GamesJoin Date: 2002-11-07Member: 7510Members
<!--QuoteBegin-Shockwave+Sep 11 2004, 03:00 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Shockwave @ Sep 11 2004, 03:00 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> I agree with everything you have said. <!--emo&::marine::--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/marine.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='marine.gif' /><!--endemo-->
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> I bash in this thread simply because I have seen this same theory debated, and <b>shredded to bits</b>. If you'd like me to repost the gawd awful spanking that this couple of minutes of ignorant propaganda generated, then please, just ask.
You just get tired of rebutting the same complete garbage....
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> But there <i>is</i> evidence to prove that an aircraft the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. You can't definitively say that it didn't happen, because you weren't there.
Furthermore, there are is a huge flaw with the "missing aircraft was shot down" theory. If a plane goes down, <i>people will notice</i>. People for miles around saw the fourth hijacked plane go down in Pennsylvania, dozens if not hundreds of people. There was a large amount of wreckage and tons of evidence. You're telling me that the US military coordinated the complete destruction and subsequent cover-up of an entire commercial airliner, with no wreckage or scorching on the ground and no witnesses? That is blatantly impossible, and it's equally impossible that the government somehow scared hundreds if not thousands of people into silence. You could threaten that many people all you want, but there's no way they wouldn't talk.
It's undeniable that a plane was destroyed, and hundreds of people were killed. Just because it's "the government's story" doesn't mean that it's true or not true, I don't understand why people drag that into this. Look at the facts, and let go of anti-government feelings as well as personal feelings.
Zig...I am Captain Planet!Join Date: 2002-10-23Member: 1576Members
<!--QuoteBegin-Marine01+Sep 11 2004, 12:32 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Marine01 @ Sep 11 2004, 12:32 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I bash in this thread simply because I have seen this same theory debated, and <b>shredded to bits</b>. If you'd like me to repost the gawd awful spanking that this couple of minutes of ignorant propaganda generated, then please, just ask.
You just get tired of rebutting the same complete garbage.... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> hahaha agreed XD
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> But there <i>is</i> evidence to prove that an aircraft the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. You can't definitively say that it didn't happen, because you weren't there.
Furthermore, there are is a huge flaw with the "missing aircraft was shot down" theory. If a plane goes down, <i>people will notice</i>. People for miles around saw the fourth hijacked plane go down in Pennsylvania, dozens if not hundreds of people. There was a large amount of wreckage and tons of evidence. You're telling me that the US military coordinated the complete destruction and subsequent cover-up of an entire commercial airliner, with no wreckage or scorching on the ground and no witnesses? That is blatantly impossible, and it's equally impossible that the government somehow scared hundreds if not thousands of people into silence. You could threaten that many people all you want, but there's no way they wouldn't talk.
It's undeniable that a plane was destroyed, and hundreds of people were killed. Just because it's "the government's story" doesn't mean that it's true or not true, I don't understand why people drag that into this. Look at the facts, and let go of anti-government feelings as well as personal feelings. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Well, of course. I wasn't there, so I have to rely on what information we have available.... (digs shameless anti-government link out)
Now, <a href='http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm' target='_blank'>this website</a> is utterly useless to me, as it's woefully biased from the very first line. What interests me is Photo #3 & #5. Those two don't look too good to me. The other thing that interests me was the initial report. Prior to 'The Official Story' the first reports from CNN said a bomb had been set off in front of the Pentagon. I remember only because I was watching at the time. How did someone manage to mix those two up? I can't really believe that was the case.
As for the location of the missing plane, I'll freely admit I don't know. But I don't believe it ended up in the side of the Pentagon. Does anyone know what the flight path was meant to be for that flight? (Just wondering if we could find potential locations it could have ended up)
<!--QuoteBegin-Shockwave+Sep 11 2004, 03:58 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Shockwave @ Sep 11 2004, 03:58 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Well, of course. I wasn't there, so I have to rely on what information we have available.... (digs shameless anti-government link out)
Now, <a href='http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm' target='_blank'>this website</a> is utterly useless to me, as it's woefully biased from the very first line. What interests me is Photo #3 & #5. Those two don't look too good to me. The other thing that interests me was the initial report. Prior to 'The Official Story' the first reports from CNN said a bomb had been set off in front of the Pentagon. I remember only because I was watching at the time. How did someone manage to mix those two up? I can't really believe that was the case.
As for the location of the missing plane, I'll freely admit I don't know. But I don't believe it ended up in the side of the Pentagon. Does anyone know what the flight path was meant to be for that flight? (Just wondering if we could find potential locations it could have ended up)
- Shockwave, working just like his namesake. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> As far as photograph number 3, I couldn't tell you one way or the other what happened there. Some reports say the plane actually bounced off of the lawn, but it doesn't seem like that's the case. It could be that it just looked like it was going to hit, and then pulled up a bit and went straight into the building at ground level.
Photograph number 5 is a bit misleading, I think, because the plane actually penetrated further than they illustrate there. There was damage all the way into the third and fourth rings, and there's also no real proof that the silhouette there is accurate or to scale.
News media always makes mistakes with initial guesses as to what happens. Almost nine times out of ten, the first prediction will be proven wrong, and as far as I know the truck bomb theory was denied and disproven almost immediately. Unless CNN actually had a reporter on-site watching the outside, it's likely they threw out the bomb theory as a reflex simply because they had no idea what really happened and a bomb is the most likely situation.
All I know about the flight path is that the plane took off from one of the northwestern airports and was headed to somewhere on the west coast. At least, that's what happened with the WTC planes and I'm pretty sure it was the same M.O.
LikuI, am the Somberlain.Join Date: 2003-01-10Member: 12128Members
<!--QuoteBegin-antifreeze+Sep 11 2004, 03:36 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (antifreeze @ Sep 11 2004, 03:36 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Meh, you know the truth <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Damn, they should have researched balance and dropped a miracle.
omg, you're right! The Moonbats, uber-gbluereen men from muranus AND Elvis! It's a <span style='color:red'>CONSPIRACY</span>!
We must defend ourselves! With... stuff. Guns are illegal around here. Unfortunately. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/confused-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused-fix.gif' /><!--endemo--> I've got a -mean- flyswatter lying around here though..
Comments
I swear the second I post a spamy topic, or start a topic deemed “controversial” it would be locked in seconds…however these things seem to live on for pages and pages.
If someone has dyslexia so bad that they can't type a coherent sentence, then they should run everything they type through a spellchecker before they post it. It's not like they're hard to find.
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave
My brother has dyslexia... He types way better than that. So does one of my friends. She types even better than my brother does.
If he truly has dyslexia, then he should make an effort and proofread his posts a few times, running it through a spellchecker before posting as well.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree with everything you have said. <!--emo&::marine::--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/marine.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='marine.gif' /><!--endemo-->
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
I bash in this thread simply because I have seen this same theory debated, and <b>shredded to bits</b>. If you'd like me to repost the gawd awful spanking that this couple of minutes of ignorant propaganda generated, then please, just ask.
You just get tired of rebutting the same complete garbage....
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
But there <i>is</i> evidence to prove that an aircraft the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. You can't definitively say that it didn't happen, because you weren't there.
Furthermore, there are is a huge flaw with the "missing aircraft was shot down" theory. If a plane goes down, <i>people will notice</i>. People for miles around saw the fourth hijacked plane go down in Pennsylvania, dozens if not hundreds of people. There was a large amount of wreckage and tons of evidence. You're telling me that the US military coordinated the complete destruction and subsequent cover-up of an entire commercial airliner, with no wreckage or scorching on the ground and no witnesses? That is blatantly impossible, and it's equally impossible that the government somehow scared hundreds if not thousands of people into silence. You could threaten that many people all you want, but there's no way they wouldn't talk.
It's undeniable that a plane was destroyed, and hundreds of people were killed. Just because it's "the government's story" doesn't mean that it's true or not true, I don't understand why people drag that into this. Look at the facts, and let go of anti-government feelings as well as personal feelings.
You just get tired of rebutting the same complete garbage.... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
hahaha agreed XD
To put a sensible viewpoint on it, the indignation we've received towards this is exactly what the US government relies on. The 'You can't possibly question this' reaction is precisely the best way to ensure questions will never seriously be asked, and probing will never be done.
The fact is, from the evidence available there was no way in hell that an aircraft of the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. What conclusion you draw from this is entirely your own choice, although I cite the fact the U.S Military is known for making those 'hard decisions' when it has to. [N.B I am in no way saying that the most common theory, that the 'missing' aircraft was shot down, was in fact the wrong thing to do. They made the choice, and tactically it was the most sound one, though not 'good guy' mentality. Good guys die in the real world.]
All I would suggest would be to put aside the personal emotion inflicted by all the events of that period, and look at what evidence we have. As people are extremely bad at this as a rule, we'll never get the exact truth out of any government, because they know that's the sort of backlash they'll receive, but <b>think.</b>
- Shockwave <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
But there <i>is</i> evidence to prove that an aircraft the size of a Boeing hit the Pentagon. You can't definitively say that it didn't happen, because you weren't there.
Furthermore, there are is a huge flaw with the "missing aircraft was shot down" theory. If a plane goes down, <i>people will notice</i>. People for miles around saw the fourth hijacked plane go down in Pennsylvania, dozens if not hundreds of people. There was a large amount of wreckage and tons of evidence. You're telling me that the US military coordinated the complete destruction and subsequent cover-up of an entire commercial airliner, with no wreckage or scorching on the ground and no witnesses? That is blatantly impossible, and it's equally impossible that the government somehow scared hundreds if not thousands of people into silence. You could threaten that many people all you want, but there's no way they wouldn't talk.
It's undeniable that a plane was destroyed, and hundreds of people were killed. Just because it's "the government's story" doesn't mean that it's true or not true, I don't understand why people drag that into this. Look at the facts, and let go of anti-government feelings as well as personal feelings. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well, of course. I wasn't there, so I have to rely on what information we have available.... (digs shameless anti-government link out)
Now, <a href='http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm' target='_blank'>this website</a> is utterly useless to me, as it's woefully biased from the very first line. What interests me is Photo #3 & #5. Those two don't look too good to me. The other thing that interests me was the initial report. Prior to 'The Official Story' the first reports from CNN said a bomb had been set off in front of the Pentagon. I remember only because I was watching at the time. How did someone manage to mix those two up? I can't really believe that was the case.
As for the location of the missing plane, I'll freely admit I don't know. But I don't believe it ended up in the side of the Pentagon. Does anyone know what the flight path was meant to be for that flight? (Just wondering if we could find potential locations it could have ended up)
- Shockwave, working just like his namesake.
Now, <a href='http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm' target='_blank'>this website</a> is utterly useless to me, as it's woefully biased from the very first line. What interests me is Photo #3 & #5. Those two don't look too good to me. The other thing that interests me was the initial report. Prior to 'The Official Story' the first reports from CNN said a bomb had been set off in front of the Pentagon. I remember only because I was watching at the time. How did someone manage to mix those two up? I can't really believe that was the case.
As for the location of the missing plane, I'll freely admit I don't know. But I don't believe it ended up in the side of the Pentagon. Does anyone know what the flight path was meant to be for that flight? (Just wondering if we could find potential locations it could have ended up)
- Shockwave, working just like his namesake. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
As far as photograph number 3, I couldn't tell you one way or the other what happened there. Some reports say the plane actually bounced off of the lawn, but it doesn't seem like that's the case. It could be that it just looked like it was going to hit, and then pulled up a bit and went straight into the building at ground level.
Photograph number 5 is a bit misleading, I think, because the plane actually penetrated further than they illustrate there. There was damage all the way into the third and fourth rings, and there's also no real proof that the silhouette there is accurate or to scale.
News media always makes mistakes with initial guesses as to what happens. Almost nine times out of ten, the first prediction will be proven wrong, and as far as I know the truck bomb theory was denied and disproven almost immediately. Unless CNN actually had a reporter on-site watching the outside, it's likely they threw out the bomb theory as a reflex simply because they had no idea what really happened and a bomb is the most likely situation.
All I know about the flight path is that the plane took off from one of the northwestern airports and was headed to somewhere on the west coast. At least, that's what happened with the WTC planes and I'm pretty sure it was the same M.O.
Damn, they should have researched balance and dropped a miracle.
DAMN YOU MOONBATS DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!!
The Moonbats, uber-gbluereen men from muranus AND Elvis!
It's a <span style='color:red'>CONSPIRACY</span>!
We must defend ourselves!
With... stuff. Guns are illegal around here. Unfortunately. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/confused-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
I've got a -mean- flyswatter lying around here though..
(hands Bo a toothbrush)
Darn high level necromancers.