3.0f

2»

Comments

  • SnidelySnidely Join Date: 2003-02-04 Member: 13098Members
    edited January 2004
    <!--QuoteBegin--ZERG!!+Jan 19 2004, 09:57 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (ZERG!! @ Jan 19 2004, 09:57 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> 75 res onos does not justify bringing the cap down to 75. In 1.0 the onos cost 80 and the cap was different at each hive stage. The cap was brought to the universal 100 to thwart the overflow problem. Overflow was taken out for some reason (2.0) and now being brought back for good reason (3.0). <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    The "overflow problem" was really only the gorge problem - the fact that he got a bigger share of the res. With that taken out, I don't see why it would be bad if the cap was lowered - otherwise, we'll probably not see overflow happen.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • BuggyBuggy Join Date: 2003-11-08 Member: 22400Members, Constellation
    call me a noob but i started NS since 2.0...what exactly is overflow?
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • TheGuyTheGuy Join Date: 2003-08-09 Member: 19295Members, Constellation
    Overflow is if someone has full res(100) , it goes into the overflow pool so other aliens can use the res instead of it just vanishing like in 2.0.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • BuggyBuggy Join Date: 2003-11-08 Member: 22400Members, Constellation
    i see. thanks...
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
Sign In or Register to comment.