Damage in ns...
Umbrella_Master
Join Date: 2002-07-12 Member: 915Members
Join Date: 2002-07-12 Member: 915Members
Comments
It doesn't bear a lot of comparison to anything you've played before, basically. Like the rest of NS.
<!--EDIT|MonsieurEvil|July 24 2002,17:47-->
my vote is for no...
<!--EDIT|Freestyler|July 26 2002,11:19-->
One shot kills are unrealistic? I happen to think a bullet to the head and I would be pretty much gone. Don't know about you.
What i wanted to say: Nothing is more realistic than being out of the game after one hit. But realistic isn't fun always.
Too bad for our boys in the army, the weapons they use really don't pack that much of a punch. My dad was telling me stories about vietnam, where he could unload a three round burst into and emey soldier and, depending on the location the bullets hit, that person could still charge after you.
An AK47 for example, with 7.62mm bullets, will take you right off your feet with a few rounds, crack and rupture bones, and cause more damage coming out on the other side than an M16 by far.
I'm not too sure about the M4A1 (latest issue rifle) although it uses the same bullet as an M16.
Or, something like a 357 revolver, now THAT thing will really knock you back, I've fired a few of them and the recoil of the shot alone only gives you 2 accurate shots every 3 seconds or so.
But, back on track to this topic....I've found that you really can't classify what the gameplay is like, exactly, because there are so many defense and offensive variables it's impossible to tell what each situation will be like. That's what makes part of NS so cool <!--emo&:)--><img src="http://www.natural-selection.org/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'><!--endemo-->
Also, this isn't to say that a commander won't have other things to do instead of keeping his eye on a small group of marines. <!--emo&:p--><img src="http://www.natural-selection.org/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':p'><!--endemo--> If he does, then his base will get raped, probably.
Remember, the M16 is a more reliable weapon. It can shoot right through thin walls and trees, it has almost <i>no</i> recoil, and it um... r0xx0r$.
Remember, the M16 is a more reliable weapon. It can shoot right through thin walls and trees, it has almost <i>no</i> recoil, and it um... r0xx0r$.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Oh come on...
EVERYONE ought to know by now that the M16 is totally unreliable (especially compared to its rival AK47). I'm not even a gun freak and I know that. (g0g0 Tales of the Gun <!--emo&:)--><img src="http://www.natural-selection.org/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'><!--endemo-->)
oh and BTW the ak47 does all those things too <!--emo&:p--><img src="http://www.natural-selection.org/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':p'><!--endemo-->
Edit: except jam
oh and for my second edit, it also costs a LOT less (less than $50 US in some parts of the world I hear)