<!--quoteo(post=1657092:date=Oct 22 2007, 01:10 AM:name=lolfighter)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(lolfighter @ Oct 22 2007, 01:10 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1657092"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I nominate this for "most stupid thread of the year."<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> ....Did you not look at any of the other threads up right now?
Zig...I am Captain Planet!Join Date: 2002-10-23Member: 1576Members
<!--quoteo(post=1657093:date=Oct 21 2007, 10:26 PM:name=Xyth)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Xyth @ Oct 21 2007, 10:26 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1657093"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->....Did you not look at any of the other threads up right now?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Indeed.
Threads I start are always locked. I think I talk about controversially stupid topics <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin-fix.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="biggrin-fix.gif" />
I don't understand why we get so many threads locked here. I mean honestly, it's not like the forum is active enough that having a few stupid threads is going to make people less likely to post in the good ones.
Also: If the mods are going to censor g a y they need to make it atleast use the correct number of ###. Because right now, it looks like it censored out a much more offensive term for homosexual.
<!--quoteo(post=1657119:date=Oct 22 2007, 02:59 PM:name=Xyth)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Xyth @ Oct 22 2007, 02:59 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1657119"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Also: If the mods are going to censor g a y they need to make it atleast use the correct number of ###. Because right now, it looks like it censored out a much more offensive term for homosexual.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Zig...I am Captain Planet!Join Date: 2002-10-23Member: 1576Members
edited October 2007
<!--quoteo(post=1657126:date=Oct 22 2007, 07:25 AM:name=Merkaba)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Merkaba @ Oct 22 2007, 07:25 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1657126"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Maybe Rowling was testing the waters of public acceptance before deciding to announce that Harry is a masochist.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Still waiting on confirmation that Cho Chang was a nymphomaniac.
<!--quoteo(post=1657019:date=Oct 21 2007, 08:59 AM:name=Thaldarin)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Thaldarin @ Oct 21 2007, 08:59 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1657019"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Dumbledore and Gandalf are part of the wizard's version of lemonparty... who is the third!?!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not bagging a old classic here but perhaps the midget wizard from willow?
<!--quoteo(post=1657142:date=Oct 22 2007, 11:04 AM:name=NEX9)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(NEX9 @ Oct 22 2007, 11:04 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1657142"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Not bagging a old classic here but perhaps the midget wizard from willow?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Now what we need is a photoshop of lemon party (censored of course, because this forum couldn't handle it... the mind of the ops would explode with "OH NOES PG13ISM!!!!") with actors in 3 roles stuck on to it in a clever way to make it look like Wizard's Lemon Party <img src="style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tounge.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":p" border="0" alt="tounge.gif" />
<!--quoteo(post=1657322:date=Oct 23 2007, 11:22 AM:name=Epidemic)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Epidemic @ Oct 23 2007, 11:22 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1657322"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Guys, dumbledore is a fictional character. They dont live or breathe air like the rest of us, much less has a sexuality! Duh!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That's like saying he doesn't have a name, age, personality, etc. Fictional characters don't exist in the physical world, but other than that they have the same characteristics of any of us, including sexual preference.
I really don't understand were you guys can come off with all this arrogance. This community isn't the place for your belittlement of someones sexual orientation, and no I'm not talking about some character in a book, but the majority of blanket statements to this topic. There isn't a difference between making fun of someones race, color, limitations, or sexuality.
Comments
....Did you not look at any of the other threads up right now?
Indeed.
They've locked better threads than this.
Also: If the mods are going to censor g a y they need to make it atleast use the correct number of ###. Because right now, it looks like it censored out a much more offensive term for homosexual.
Hmm, didnt notive that before.
######got???
Still waiting on confirmation that Cho Chang was a nymphomaniac.
Not bagging a old classic here but perhaps the midget wizard from willow?
That actually makes a little sense.
You go make that. Stare at some feisty old man pen0r.
not targeting you abra, just couldnt resist a ok punch line.
That's like saying he doesn't have a name, age, personality, etc. Fictional characters don't exist in the physical world, but other than that they have the same characteristics of any of us, including sexual preference.
I really don't understand were you guys can come off with all this arrogance. This community isn't the place for your belittlement of someones sexual orientation, and no I'm not talking about some character in a book, but the majority of blanket statements to this topic. There isn't a difference between making fun of someones race, color, limitations, or sexuality.
Grow up.